Why is the assumption that Socialist / Democratic voters are some how inferior to others in basic rules of society ? That voter ID is somehow harder for them than the rest of Americans .
The goal of eliminating voter fraud is something all Americans should fully support .
The GOP is Supressing the VOTE........How will this effect your vote ?
Shylee
2012/07/28 13:13:55
|
|
|||||
|
61 votes
|
|
98% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
2% | |||
The thought of a Black Man telling white people hows its gona be is forcing the GOP to play dirty.There is Racism written all over this.Rick Perry is screwing his own party.He thinks hes hurting the Democrats.There are more Republicans with limited means than there are Democrats in the state of Texas.Democrats are a minorty here.Now Republicans are asking how do they get the proper ID to vote and some are saying im not voting.Thats gona be a problem for the GOP.I dont think they thought this thing through.
Top Opinion
-
ray 2012/07/28 14:21:42
If it looks like cheating, smells like cheating, it MUST be cheating. Of all convictions for vote fraud Demoncrat operatives have out numbered GOP operatives by 30%.
"Supreme Court stoped the voting in Florida and gave the election to W." Are you that young? The voting was long over before the SCOTUS became involved. The Demoncrats had four tries in recounts to overturn the will of the people and they failed every time. Or do you propose allowing recounts until the Demoncrats can manufacture a win? Hey! Answer me this why was the recount in Florida held only in the most Demoncrat of counties?
The only ones engaged in any kind of vote or election fraud is the Demoncrat party. Manufacturing voters & votes they can control of suppressing those groups that they believe will NEVER vote their way. Demoncrat and an election = cheaters!
Your vote always counts! Unless you oppose the Demoncrat party.
There is nary a SHRED of evidence that the GOP wishes or is trying to suppress any votes. Yet there is evidence that the administration is trying to suppress the votes of members of the military. Then there is the rampant evidence of all of the vote & election fraud engaged in by the Demoncrats, most recently in Racine WI (with the collusion of the city clerk).
The Obama campaign is studiously avoiding any mention of the President's accomplishments during his first term. Wonder why? Perhaps because there are none that can be called "accomplishments" So Obama falls back on his tried & true tactics of seeking to destroy his opponents personally. Thereby hoping that those that WON'T vote for him will stay home. I believe that, that qualifies as voter suppression.
To be clear laws requiring an ID to cast a vote are in no way a suppression of votes. When you try to claim otherwise the levelof evidence is going to be quite high.
That is you have proven nothing. Merely found a new way to CLAIM voter suppression.
Have a great day
"The 2002 federal Help America Vote Act requires any voter who registered by mail and who has not previously voted in a federal election to show current and valid photo identification or a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter." Looks like a Bush era program here.
"In 1999, Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore (R) attempted to start a pilot program that required voters to show IDs at the polls. His initiative was blocked by Democrats and the NAACP, and was stopped by court order. His administration had spent and mailed $275,000 worth of free voter ID cards to residents in Arlington and Fairfax counties. In the aftermath of the 2000 election, where George W. Bush narrowly won Florida by 537 votes, the American public and lawmakers became more receptive to measures against voter fraud. In 2002, President Bush signed the Help America Vote Act into law, which required all first-time voters in federal elections to show photo or non-photo ID upon either registration or arrival at the polling place.
In 2004, Arizona passed a law requiring voters to bring a state-issued photo ID to the polling place. Similar proposals were discussed in various othe...
"The 2002 federal Help America Vote Act requires any voter who registered by mail and who has not previously voted in a federal election to show current and valid photo identification or a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter." Looks like a Bush era program here.
"In 1999, Virginia Governor Jim Gilmore (R) attempted to start a pilot program that required voters to show IDs at the polls. His initiative was blocked by Democrats and the NAACP, and was stopped by court order. His administration had spent and mailed $275,000 worth of free voter ID cards to residents in Arlington and Fairfax counties. In the aftermath of the 2000 election, where George W. Bush narrowly won Florida by 537 votes, the American public and lawmakers became more receptive to measures against voter fraud. In 2002, President Bush signed the Help America Vote Act into law, which required all first-time voters in federal elections to show photo or non-photo ID upon either registration or arrival at the polling place.
In 2004, Arizona passed a law requiring voters to bring a state-issued photo ID to the polling place. Similar proposals were discussed in various other states and were passed in some cases. In several states a person's citizenship status is noted on their photo ID.
Indiana passed a law in 2005 requiring a photo ID be shown by all voters before casting ballots. Civil rights groups in Indiana launched a lawsuit, Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, that reached the Supreme Court in 2008. The Court ruled that the law was constitutional, paving the way for expanded laws in other states." Clearly this is, as I said, nothing new.
It is also very telling that no one has ever been heard complaining about the law passed in Rhode Island. "Rhode Island passed a voter ID law in 2011, the only state with a Democratic-controlled legislature to do so"
http://www.thegatewaypundit.c...
http://www.maciverinstitute.c...
http://www.maciverinstitute.c...
http://caledonia.patch.com/ar...
http://www.journaltimes.com/n...
http://mediatrackers.org/2012...
http://mediatrackers.org/2012...
Clearly to any reasonable minded person this is a significant amount of evidence that there is a problem. The last of the above list shows a glaring error in that there is no proof of residence provided.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.c...
http://www.maciverinstitute.c...
http://www.maciverinstitute.c...
http://caledonia.patch.com/ar...
http://www.journaltimes.com/n...
http://mediatrackers.org/2012...
http://mediatrackers.org/2012...
Clearly to any reasonable minded person this is a significant amount of evidence that there is a problem. The last of the above list shows a glaring error in that there is no proof of residence provided.
An exhaustive new report finds that the "problem" of "voter fraud" - the supposed impetus behind 37 states passing tough voter ID laws that could disenfranchise over 5 million Americans - is "infinitesimal" and "virtually non-existent," with 10 alleged cases surfacing among 146 million voters. The findings confirm another study finding a fraud rate of 0.000002%, or lower than the number of people killed by lightning.
" the supposed impetus behind 37 states passing tough voter ID laws that could disenfranchise over 5 million Americans" Just how do you come up with such a ridiculous figure? There are nowhere near that many people that do not have a government issued ID. Hell in my state that number is actually ZERO people without a state issued ID!
"infinitesimal" and "virtually non-existent," How is it even possible to say such a thing. when there exists no way to match a ballot to any individual voter? All of those fraudulent registrations in Racine can not be matched to any ballot, nor are the obvious errors even being challenged. In fact when a poll watcher attempted to challenge a bogus registration they were told to get lost or threatened with violence of police. Considering ...
" the supposed impetus behind 37 states passing tough voter ID laws that could disenfranchise over 5 million Americans" Just how do you come up with such a ridiculous figure? There are nowhere near that many people that do not have a government issued ID. Hell in my state that number is actually ZERO people without a state issued ID!
"infinitesimal" and "virtually non-existent," How is it even possible to say such a thing. when there exists no way to match a ballot to any individual voter? All of those fraudulent registrations in Racine can not be matched to any ballot, nor are the obvious errors even being challenged. In fact when a poll watcher attempted to challenge a bogus registration they were told to get lost or threatened with violence of police. Considering further that recent votes, including Al Franken's, have swung on as few as TWO VOTES per precinct. At this level even the specious .000002% changes the outcome of an election. Every fraudulent vote DISENFRANCHISES a legitimate voter. Based on prior comments y'all should be up in arms about that.
Seems to me that the little todo in Racine was a dress rehearsal for November, since Obama can't win fair. 2007 being a possible exception he never has.
But evidence exists of multiple & large scale fraud.
So have at it I eagerly await your proof!
How is that an argument? That is giving you an opportunity to show where I am wrong. Ideally your proof would involve more than one source. I use more than one and I have only addressed the most recent event in a single area.
Yeah im a Texan.I dont know if i should say it out loud.Oh girl your state is just as bad as mine.
There was another mass shooting today in Wisconsin.What messed world we live in.