![The Global Warming Skeptics vs The Scientific Consensus [infographic]](http://images.sodahead.com/blogs/000221411/blogs_Hockey_stick_chart_ipcc_large_0448_720291_poll_xlarge.jpeg "The Global Warming Skeptics vs The Scientific Consensus [infographic]")
The Global Warming Skeptics vs The Scientific Consensus [infographic]
- December 23, 2009 23:05:06
- Read all 17 opinions
Read more: http://s3.amazonaws.com/infobeautiful/climate_skep...
Top Opinion
-
Frank December 24, 2009 06:31:25
About Me
Recent Posts
-
Who's the Hottest Male Actor Over 50?
-
What Was the Best Season Finale?
-
Who's the Meanest Reality TV Judge?
- View more slideshows »
News
-
Michelle Obama Would Trade Places With Beyonce: Who Would You Trade Places With?
In an interview with People magazine, Michelle Obama admitted that she would trade places with pop singer Beyonce if she could.
-
Bill Clinton Poses With Porn Stars: Acceptable or Unprofessional?
Bill Clinton has seen bigger scandals in his time, but a recent photograph of the former president is dragging him into a little bit of unwanted controversy.
Politics
-
Who Do You Think Will Ultimately Win the 2012 Election?
It's going to be a long, hard fight between Barack Obama and his likely GOP competitor, Mitt Romney. But who do you think will ultimately win?
-
Who Do You Think Currently Has the Upper Hand in the 2012 Election?
It's going to be a long, hard fight between Barack Obama and his likely GOP competitor, Mitt Romney. But who do you think currently has the upper hand?
Thanks pbird49
Polluting our water and land are a totally separate issue that we do have an impact on as occupants. Over time, the earth can still heal itself from these issues too.
The picture below is a prime example of climate change histeryia. The fact is there are five-times more polar bears now than in 2007 and contrary to initial and flawed reports (admitted to by NASA) the ice melting figures were way off base.
I say Stop the the propaganda!
Volcanoes emit far more SO2 than any other gas. And the net impact of large volcanic eruptions is global COOLING. In fact, if you take all the CO2 emitted by all active volcanoes together, they don't account for any more than 5% of that contributed by humans.
I would suggest you do some research, using objective scientific sources. You can start here:
http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/h...
The Earth isn't in trouble - it will heal itself.
But - humans are f***ked.
Sometimes scientists do get their reputations hurt, when they are exposed by other scientists as being un-scientific. In 1989 2 electrochemists -Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons reported that they had discovered a process to create "cold fusion". Their claims would have been a real breakthrough, and there was much excitement generated. Their results could not be replicated, and the 2 scientists and their methods were not peer reviewed well. They were wrong. Should anyone have worried about their reputations? It is the risk that is taken. That is why a scientist should always follow the process and not advocate. What has happened with conservative advocates who have used science lately is that when their results have been discredited- they take their case to an uninformed -scientifically- public and cry no fair. Of course their arguments can sound convincing and scientific to scientifically uninformed people like Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh.