The Global Warming Skeptics vs The Scientific Consensus [infographic]
- 2009/12/23 23:05:06
- Read all 17 opinions
Read more: http://s3.amazonaws.com/infobeautiful/climate_skep...
Top Opinion
-
Frank 2009/12/24 06:31:25
About Me
Recent Posts
-
Who's the Hottest Mess in Hollywood?
-
Who's the Most Out-of-Touch Celebrity?
-
Who's the Hottest Celeb Couple of 2013?
- View more slideshows »
News
-
Vladimir Putin Announces Divorce: Should Leaders Keep Their Private Lives Private?
Russian president Vladimir Putin announced his divorce publicly on Thursday, surprising the Russian public despite years of hearsay.
-
The NSA Has Been Collecting Verizon Phone Call Records: Counterterrorism or Just Crooked?
British newspaper The Guardian claims the U.S. National Security Administration has been collecting large amounts of phone calls from Verizon customers.
Politics
-
PUBLIC OPINION > Rand Paul Is the Future of the Republican Party
Ever since President Obama's re-election back in November, the media hasn't stopped reporting about the ruffled course of the Republican party. So who's the future face of the GOP? Find out how the public voted.
-
PUBLIC OPINION > Chris Christie Should Stay a Republican
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has been at the center of media coverage for a while now. But more recently, the buzz has been about his proclaimed political party -- and whether or not he should change it.
![The Global Warming Skeptics vs The Scientific Consensus [infographic] The Global Warming Skeptics vs The Scientific Consensus [infographic]](http://images.sodahead.com/blogs/000221411/blogs_Hockey_stick_chart_ipcc_large_0448_720291_poll_xlarge.jpeg)

















Thanks pbird49
Polluting our water and land are a totally separate issue that we do have an impact on as occupants. Over time, the earth can still heal itself from these issues too.
The picture below is a prime example of climate change histeryia. The fact is there are five-times more polar bears now than in 2007 and contrary to initial and flawed reports (admitted to by NASA) the ice melting figures were way off base.
I say Stop the the propaganda!
Volcanoes emit far more SO2 than any other gas. And the net impact of large volcanic eruptions is global COOLING. In fact, if you take all the CO2 emitted by all active volcanoes together, they don't account for any more than 5% of that contributed by humans.
I would suggest you do some research, using objective scientific sources. You can start here:
http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/h...
The Earth isn't in trouble - it will heal itself.
But - humans are f***ked.
Sometimes scientists do get their reputations hurt, when they are exposed by other scientists as being un-scientific. In 1989 2 electrochemists -Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons reported that they had discovered a process to create "cold fusion". Their claims would have been a real breakthrough, and there was much excitement generated. Their results could not be replicated, and the 2 scientists and their methods were not peer reviewed well. They were wrong. Should anyone have worried about their reputations? It is the risk that is taken. That is why a scientist should always follow the process and not advocate. What has happened with conservative advocates who have used science lately is that when their results have been discredited- they take their case to an uninformed -scientifically- public and cry no fair. Of course their arguments can sound convincing and scientific to scientifically uninformed people like Glen Beck and Rush Limbaugh.