The decision of the Supreme Court Re Obama SS # Fraud will be released on Tuesday!!
|
|
|||||
|
122 votes
|
|
73% | |||
|
44 votes
|
|
27% | |||
Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama, he’s the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today.
The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes.
Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward. We’ll see.
Meantime, on Feb. 4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter registrations in the State of California. The appeal also involves Obama’s lack of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on his forged IDs, stolen Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name he’s using is not legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen.
Evidence in the case includes:
- A certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her son’s legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama.
- Obama’s school records from Indonesia, showing his citizenship to be Indonesian.
- Sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators, showing Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent. (The SSN failed when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service.)
On another legal front, Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols et al v. Obama et al on Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony SSN.
The suit states:
[I]nvestigator Albert Hendershot found in the database ofhttp://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batc... the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative. Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. Military.
Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided the last missing link, link (sic) between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890. Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.
There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when [George W.] Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.
Taitz has asked for expedited default judgment and post judgment discovery in this case out of fear that any records on hand at the Social Security office will be destroyed when George W. Bush-appointed Commissioner Michael Astrue leaves office in February. Records that might have proven Obama’s Selective Service registration was a forgery were destroyed in 2009 after Bush-appointed Selective Service Director William Chatfield resigned, Taitz alleges.
Read More: http://randysrightiii.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/the...
Top Opinion
-
I guess we will see how corrupt our courts are..+15We thus will hear Tuesday whether SCOTUS, supposedly the government owned "justice system" will hear Orly Taitz at last. Bless her heart, she keeps trying!
Some of her charges sound on-the-mark provable. Let's hope she gets the hearing, and has the moxie to make a case which cannot be refuted. SCOTUS will surely be looking for any crack to let pseudo-prez off the hook.
Well done post, Teri.





















Bob Goodlatte: 202 - 225 - 5431
Let them know you're pissed about the outright corruption being displayed within the Judiciary system from bottom to top! Let them know that you expect for there to be a full investigation and prosecution of those involved in the obstruction of justice, as well as a financial audit of all individuals involved to see if they were paid for such atrocities!!! It's time they had better clean house, if they expect to ever have any faith by americans in the judiciary system!
Taitz wasn’t quite up front about pending issues, claiming that she only faced a minor discovery sanction. But it turns out that “Taitz is being sued for allegedly making a series of false, defamatory statements about private individuals as well as for planting invasive spy software on the computers of visitors to her various websites.”
So, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew J. Guilford ordered:
On October 22, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to “inform the Court immediately of any actions taken on pending ethical, disciplinary, or related matters.” On January 14, 2013, the Court was alerted to a possible unreported sanction against Orly Taitz. Taitz said in Court that the sanction was for discovery. The parties have since subjected the Court to a flurry of papers, which the Court dismisses as irrelevant except for the sole issue now of whether Taitz lied to the Court when she said the sanction was for di...
Taitz wasn’t quite up front about pending issues, claiming that she only faced a minor discovery sanction. But it turns out that “Taitz is being sued for allegedly making a series of false, defamatory statements about private individuals as well as for planting invasive spy software on the computers of visitors to her various websites.”
So, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew J. Guilford ordered:
On October 22, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to “inform the Court immediately of any actions taken on pending ethical, disciplinary, or related matters.” On January 14, 2013, the Court was alerted to a possible unreported sanction against Orly Taitz. Taitz said in Court that the sanction was for discovery. The parties have since subjected the Court to a flurry of papers, which the Court dismisses as irrelevant except for the sole issue now of whether Taitz lied to the Court when she said the sanction was for discovery. Some evidence has been presented to the Court that the sanction involved far more than discovery.
The Court therefore now ORDERS Taitz to show cause in writing why she should not be sanctioned for lying to this Court. Taitz, and any other party, may file by February 4, 2013, papers on this order to show cause not exceeding 10 pages each in total. Particularly helpful would be documentary proof of the nature of and reasons for the subject sanction previously ordered against Taitz.
http://www.popularmechanics.c...
You are now going to be taxed on not doing nothing: That nothing is not buying "Insurance."
Roberts and all of congress that voted for this monstrosity should all be arrested and tried for treason.
THEY ARE all DOMESTIC TERRORISTS. Arrest Bush, Cheney, and the entire Military Cronies that blew up the world trade center and sent a missile into the Pentagon and started those phony wars and tortured those so called terrorists.
Bottom line is, this is just mud slinging. If there were proof, it would have been trotted out long ago.
It is Thursday today, the USSC should have voted to render a decision or to dismiss, I haven't heard a word on the news about this. If they dismiss, the court will be looked upon as "broomers" by the Middle, if they decide to take the case, it will be looked upon as unfair by the Left. I can't comment on the Right since it doesn't really exist in America, there is only the Middle and the Left.
Give me a break.
LOL, She is currently facing being (sanctioned) in a California Federal Court for lying (in court.
source: http://www.politicususa.com/s...
that's really all that comes to mind when I read your post and the ones of your friends.
that aside, SH is an international site and if this bothers you, take it up with SH.
the Tea-party is a laughing stock around the globe, so I doubt I will be 'butting out' any time soon.
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
What if Snopes is correct on both counts.
Then one has to download the forged birthcertificate from whitehouse.gov, enlarge it and view the mess for themselves, after which they can delve into the SS # issue.
There isn't a forged birth certificate on the White House website.