THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY THAT WILL SEAL OBAMA'S FATE.

A shocking number of investigative reporters are coming to the same horrifying
conclusion. Benghazi-gate is NOT just about covering up
Obama Regime security and foreign-policy ineptitude that directly lead to the
murder of four brave Americans on the eve of a presidential election.


Rather... leaving these Americans to die horrible deaths
was potentially part of a much larger, AND
CRIMINAL, cover-up... an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; "the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent
Jihadists [and] self-styled al Qaeda terrorists" ... a cover-up that
involves government officials at the highest levels, al-Qaeda operatives,
radical jihadists, the Muslim Brotherhood and even George Soros.


Barack Obama may think that a handful of insignificant State Department
resignations and the rigged results of a bogus "independent investigation" (that was launched to whitewash this growing
scandal) are going to make Benghazi-gate go away, but he's wrong... because
we're not going to let him get away with it.

The American
people deserve the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth
and we're going to force our elected officials to get the American people those
answers.
How Is George Soros
Connected To This Emerging Scandal?


Everyone with a pulse already knows that the
Obama Regime promoted an outrageously false story that anger over an
obscure YouTube video fueled the Benghazi attack, but few know that the so-called Accountability Review Board
investigation was quite possibly another attempt to cover-up the Obama Regime's
treasonous role in aiding America's enemies abroad.


Political commentator Dick Morris says that "the blue ribbon commission charged with
investigating the attack... perpetuates a cover-up by distracting attention from
the main issue to side matters." In other words, both the false
YouTube narrative and the so-called "independent
investigation" of this cover-up may actually be part of a much larger
cover-up.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. Investigative
journalist Aaron Klein with WND tells us: "The panel’s lead investigator into the
Benghazi attack, former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, has largely unreported ties
to the revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa."


Klein goes on to say: "Pickering serves on the
small board of the International Crisis Group, or ICG" and "Billionaire activist
George Soros is on ICG’s executive board." Klein adds: "ICG itself has long petitioned
for talks with Hamas as well as normalized relations with the Muslim
Brotherhood."

Pickering's credentials beg the question:
Why would a man with such long-standing ties to
radical Islam and globalist America-haters like George Soros be tapped to head
an "independent
investigation" into Benghazi-gate.
Should we be shocked that the "blue ribbon
commission's" findings were nothing more than a complete and total
whitewash? The obvious answer to the second question isn't no ... it's hell no.


Morris adds that "there will be a temptation
on Capitol Hill to drop the inquiry after the Hillary-less hearing. We must not
let them do so. Don't let her off the hook."

He's
right and we mustn't allow our elected officials to enable
Barack Obama's efforts to sweep Benghazi-gate under the rug. We must demand
justice.

Something Stinks
And The Stench Leads To 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.


But Pickering simply isn't on the board of the
Soros-funded ICG. According to Wikipedia, he's the co-chairman and directly
oversees the ICG's international actions.

Pickering is also a
member of the Council of Foreign Relations and serves on the board of the
American Iranian Council, an organization devoted to the "normalization" of relations between Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's Iran and America.

When it comes to the previously
posed question: Why would a man with such long-standing ties to radical Islam
and globalist America-haters like George Soros be tapped to head an "independent investigation" into Benghazi-gate;
political commentator Andrew Malcolm, in Investors Business Daily (IBD) draws the
following conclusion.

Malcolm states: "The report from the Accountability Review
Board...is only one tiny piece of a vast bureaucratic ballet that has evolved in
Washington."
The New American, referring to
Malcolm's IBD article, adds: "The purpose, he [Malcolm]
said, is to shift people’s attention away from real scandals using what
essentially amounts to deceitful PR tactics, and the establishment press often
plays along. 'It's an amazingly sophisticated and bipartisan procedure that
looks sound to naive eyes,' Malcolm continued. 'It's built upon powerful
self-interest and savvy strategic communications that manages and manipulates
information and the timing of its release to minimize damage to incumbents and
to dampen ongoing media interest in pursuing an embarrassing matter
further.'"

And what are the "real scandals?" For starters,
Klein tells us that the Benghazi Consulate "was not a consulate.”


He adds: "According to Middle East security officials I
talked to, this was a major meeting point — I would say the central meeting
point — for the American diplomats... to meet with officials of Turkey, Saudi
Arabia, and Qatar, about supplying the opposition in Syria and Libya. Well, who is
the opposition? In Libya, the opposition openly included jihadists, included
al-Qaeda elements. In Syria, right now, the al-Qaeda elements are leading the
opposition....”
Is the arming of al-Qaeda elements and radical jihadists what Obama was talking
about when he said "I will stand with them should the political
winds shift in an ugly direction." There's only one way to find out. Congress must act to get at the
truth... no dog-and-pony shows that end in more whitewashes... the American
people deserve facts.

Here Are Some Real
Questions.

It's clear that we're
confronted with a scandal that goes beyond simple incompetence that resulted in
the deaths of brave Americans and an incompetent attempt to deflect blame away
from that incompetence prior to an election.

We may be dealing with something more
sinister and the following questions, posed in an article in The
New American, go to the heart of the matter.

• What was the Obama administration’s full role
in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and
Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?


• Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist
leaders, who as the report acknowledges had previously fought U.S. troops in
Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have
suggested?

• What was actually going on at
the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a “consulate”
despite establishment media claims?

• Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming
Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama
called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence
suggests?

• Why did the administration
claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone
awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?


• Was the lack of security at the
compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter
chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya,
as even members of Congress have alleged?

According to the ARB report: "Systematic failures and
leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of
the State Department resulted in a Special Mission security posture that was
inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took
place.”

Give us a break. The ARB report is an insult to anyone
possessing more intelligence than God gave the common dog. It doesn't even
acknowledge the important questions and the American people deserve to have those question
asked... and answered... by our elected officials.

http://www.cfourstrategies.com/WesternJournalism/wjcheader1.jpg