The burial cloth of Jesus Christ: Could this be the first photograph ever taken?
The Truth
2012/03/05 00:44:04
"Information everyone in the world should know. You owe it to yourself to watch with an open mind. And let your spirit hear it.."
Why do people cling to erroneous or at least questionable carbon 14 dating "tests" and completely ignore the VP-8 image analyzer? This scientific marvel measures an image isometrically, and has proven beyond any reasonable doubt, that the shroud does posses 3-D properties that could not have been placed there by an artist. (EVEN today!)
It all comes down to opinion; Even among the leading scientists in the world. So, what's your opinion?
It all comes down to opinion; Even among the leading scientists in the world. So, what's your opinion?
Read More: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/american-pro...
For centuries I mean like every century up until the mid 20th people were wrapped in burrial cloths. They were so important in the rite/ritual that when ever something occured people looked at the clothas a "Sign" of how to deal with things.
2 examples: "BRICK EATERS" of Italy. During an early outbreak of a plague mass graves were dug and bodies wrapped in cloth were laid in, but the graves where left uncovered until filled. thus the process of decomp was vissible. What people saw then lead to teh idea of "Vamperism". They KNEW people were dying of unknown causes, they SAW the cloth around teh mouths of teh dead torn open and they SAW the teeth of teh dead exposed as gum tissue was pulled back.... they began shoving brinks into the mouths of teh dead to stop them from "chewing through" the clothes and after a time the plague ran its course and ... well we know have all kinds of vampir lore.
"BLUE IS FOR BOYS" again during a outbreak of plauge people SAW how the bed linnens of those who were dying would be stainined "Pink" (as a result of the leasions breaking and the puss ozzing out) they began to think if a person...
For centuries I mean like every century up until the mid 20th people were wrapped in burrial cloths. They were so important in the rite/ritual that when ever something occured people looked at the clothas a "Sign" of how to deal with things.
2 examples: "BRICK EATERS" of Italy. During an early outbreak of a plague mass graves were dug and bodies wrapped in cloth were laid in, but the graves where left uncovered until filled. thus the process of decomp was vissible. What people saw then lead to teh idea of "Vamperism". They KNEW people were dying of unknown causes, they SAW the cloth around teh mouths of teh dead torn open and they SAW the teeth of teh dead exposed as gum tissue was pulled back.... they began shoving brinks into the mouths of teh dead to stop them from "chewing through" the clothes and after a time the plague ran its course and ... well we know have all kinds of vampir lore.
"BLUE IS FOR BOYS" again during a outbreak of plauge people SAW how the bed linnens of those who were dying would be stainined "Pink" (as a result of the leasions breaking and the puss ozzing out) they began to think if a person was wrapped in "pink" that death would come for tehm thus samll boy children and infants were wrapped in blue hiquality cloth taht didn't stain as easy while females were wrapped in common cloth....
NOW my POINT... the burial cloth is a "HIGH" rite. It has always been carefully attended and carefully used. But if ... IF... the cloth was going to be able to "absorb" the image of the person of whom was wrapped it would have done so many many times over before it did for the "CHRIST".
Now if you are a non believer (I am not a non beliver I am just not a christian) the science says this is a fack and teh historical facts confirm the history.
BUT, if you are a believer (or you want to believe in miricals which is closer to what I want) then you look at teh science and you look at teh history and you say this is not either this is a mirical and you end teh debate. you simply can not PROVE miricals with science if you could they wouldn't be miricals now would they?
Still to this day, it can not be duplicated, even with the toys we have today.
like I said if it best serves its purpose as a mirical I am happy with that.
I don't say it deserves worship, or deity status.. Only that it is a creditable peace of evidence, to the scriptural account of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The cloth poses 3D properties, as a frame of film would after taking a photograph, only here, the cloth was the film. and the 'flash' came from every pore in the subjects body.
The cloth should be considered miraculous to even the most atheistic person, capable of any moderation of reason.
You do not need micrals only teh ability to read historic text.
I'm okay with it and am amazed at what they can do nowadays with the science to prove this. Or for those that want to disprove it...
documentary on the shroud.
Then came Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulcher, and saw the linen cloths lying, ("Cloths" not one piece)
John 20:7 KJV
And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.
John 20:6 NIV
Then Simon Peter, who was behind him, arrived and went into the tomb. He saw the strips of linen lying there,
And my answer is still no.
I simply thought you were wiser than to do such a thing.
However in the end what does it prove? Does it prove that this is a shroud from Jesus? Or does it prove that someone was crucified? Considering that before the 11th century the "church" did not use the cross as their "symbol" because crucifixion was still considered a torture device.
The bottom line is people believe to see what they want to believe they see. And organized religion relies on "faith" over science.