Sweden's Twitter Experiment: Good Idea or Recipe for Disaster?
SodaHead News
2012/06/13 13:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
495 votes
|
|
56% | |||
|
388 votes
|
|
44% | |||
For the last nine months, Sweden's official Twitter account (@Sweden) has been handed over to a new citizen each week as part of a social media experiment. But this week the experiment took a turn for the worse when 27-year-old Sonja Abrahamsson took the reigns and began tweeting about Jewish people, circumcision, nazis, and the holocaust. Yeah...
Abrahamsson wrote, "I just don't get why some people hates jews so much. Where I come from there is no jews. I guess its a religion. But why were the nazis talking about races? ... Once I asked a co-worker what a jew is. He was 'part jew,' whatever that means ... Whats the fuzz with jews. You can’t even see if a person is a jew, unless you see their penises, and even if you do, you can’t be sure!?" Needless to say, there was some outrage. But does this reflect poorly on Sweden's experiment, or does it still have value?

Abrahamsson wrote, "I just don't get why some people hates jews so much. Where I come from there is no jews. I guess its a religion. But why were the nazis talking about races? ... Once I asked a co-worker what a jew is. He was 'part jew,' whatever that means ... Whats the fuzz with jews. You can’t even see if a person is a jew, unless you see their penises, and even if you do, you can’t be sure!?" Needless to say, there was some outrage. But does this reflect poorly on Sweden's experiment, or does it still have value?























Or she could be trolling. :D
The Jewish population of Sweden
is estimated at about 20,000 that pass the halakhic criteria. Of those about 7,000 is a member of any congregation.
Increasing Anti-Semitism is occurring in Sweden. Members of the Swedish Parliament have attended anti-Israel rallies where the Israeli flag was burned while the flags of Hamas and Hezbollah were waved, and the rhetoric was often anti-Semitic—not just anti-Israel. But such public rhetoric is not branded hateful and denounced. Charles Small, director of the Yale University Initiative for the Study of Anti-Semitism, stated that “Sweden is a microcosm of contemporary anti-Semitism. It’s a form of acquiescence to radical Islam, which is diametrically opposed to everything Sweden stands for.” Per Gudmundson, chief editorial writer for Svenska Dagbladet, has sharply criticized politicians who he claims offer “weak excuses” for Muslims accused of anti-Semitic crimes. “Politicians say these kids are poor and oppressed, and we have made them hate. They are, in effect, saying the behavior of these kids is in some way our fault.”
Apparently the organizers knew all about the kind of offensive drivel that comes out of her head BEFORE they even selected her. It's working just as planned.....they're getting a thousand new followers for this account every hour, and you KNOW they've gotta be LOVING the world-wide free press they're getting from this.
We live in a world where THIS represents the nation of Sweden:
THIS is a television celebrity:
And THIS is the leader of the greatest nation on earth:
Andy Warhol was right.....
Does Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi deserve to be a television celebrity? Fuggedaboutit!
Should the man Bill Clinton called 'an amateur' have ever been elected president?
I see that you rarely answer political questions....but I thought that the tie-in was pretty obvious. As a society, we really don't care if people are qualified or not. We love our trainwrecks and we just can't pull ourselves away from watching them.
Truly ANYONE can be world-famous for 15 minutes.
(As an FYI: In 2009 there were 15,700 reported sexual offenses in Sweden, a rise of 8% compared to 2008, of which 5,940 were rape and sexual harassment (including exhibitionism) accounted for 7,590 reports. In April 2009, it was reported that sex crimes had increased by 58% over the previous ten years.According to a 2009 European Union study, Sweden has one of the highest rates of reported rape in Europe.)
http://fjordman.blogspot.ca/2...
I don't think she was trying to be mean, I'm pretty sure she just didn't understand and was sharing her questions/views and looking for others'. So what's the big deal? WWII (with everything it encompassed) happened, we all know it, it was a very VERY terrible thing. Is it too soon to talk about? We do in history classes.
She just seems a bit naive, like she was never really educated about the topic? It was tactless, but still.. What a better way to find information than on the World Wide Web, eh?
*I* don't understand the "outrage". Please explain it to me someone if you could, without being negative...