Survey Confirms Right Wing Disconnect With Reality
The disconnect between the Right Wing and reality seems to be growing larger by the day. And not only on Sodahead, where Right Wingers routinely embarrass themselves by claiming that there is no economic recovery, that the stimulus failed, that the President had nothing to do with getting bin Laden, that Bush had anything to do with getting bin Laden, and of course the champions of obliviousness, the birthers. The disconnect extends to rewriting history to deny that the Civil War had anything to do with slavery or that the New Deal didn't end the Great Depression and usher in half a century of our greatest prosperity. It isn't that Right Wingers are stupid (although some are) but rather an obsessive inability to accept that the universe simply is not what they want it to be. A recent survey out of Dartmouth University confirms that there is a real and serious disconnect among the Right Wing with proven reality. Why this happens is not clear. For some, such as the birthers, it seems to be a categorical rejection of the concept of a black President. For others, it may simply be the idea that if a Democrat does something it cannot be good, despite the improvement of their own lives that results.
Article excerpt follows:
Yes, Iraq Definitely Had WMD, Vast Majority Of Polled Republicans Insist
By Dan Froomkin
06/21/2012
WASHINGTON -- How misinformed are Republicans about world affairs? If presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney's assertion that Russia is "without question our number one geopolitical foe" is any indication, then the answer would appear to be very.
A new poll supports that theory.
The poll, constructed by Dartmouth government professor Benjamin Valentino and conducted by YouGov from April 26 to May 2, found that fully 63 percent of Republican respondents still believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when the U.S. invaded in 2003. By contrast, 27 percent of independents and 15 percent of Democrats shared that view.
Jim Lobe, chief of the Inter Press Service's Washington bureau, reported the finding in his blog on Wednesday.
The Bush administration's insistence that the Iraqi government had weapons of mass destruction and might give them to terrorists was a key selling point in its campaign to take the country to war. It turned out to be untrue.
Debate continues over whether former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, and other top officials knew there were no WMD, but intentionally deceived the American people and Congress because they were intent on attacking Iraq for less palatable reasons -- or whether they managed to convince themselves that it was true using cherry-picked intelligence.
There is no reality-based argument that Iraq actually had WMD, after extensive searches found none, but this is hardly the first time many Americans have been certain of something that simply wasn't true.
A Washington Post poll in September 2003 found that nearly 70 percent of all Americans were convinced that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks -- even though he was not.
Bush, Cheney and others consistently linked al Qaeda to Hussein in speeches they gave in the run-up to war, and the media rarely pushed back. But neither Bush nor Cheney continued to claim that there were actual WMDs in Iraq once the searches came up empty -- although they both continued to insist that Saddam had the "capability" to produce them.
Rather than a failure of the media, therefore, this latest poll result seems to indicate a refusal -- unique to the modern Republican Party -- to acknowledge facts.
According to this poll, an even larger proportion of Republican respondents who said Iraq had WMD -- 64 percent -- said they have either always believed (or have come to believe) that Barack Obama was born in another country, which he was not.
Overall, the poll found Republicans to be considerably more militaristic in their worldview than Democrats and independents.
In a finding that would indicate plenty of GOP support for yet another war in the Middle East, nearly two-thirds of Republicans said it's very likely that if Iran produces a nuclear weapon, it would use it against Israel.
Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/21/iraq-wmd-...
Top Opinion
-
whitewulf--the unruly mobster 2012/06/22 13:52:24






















What can you expect from Huffington Post?
AND THERE WILL BE NO MORE QUESTIONING OF OUR GOD-LIKE FUHRER!
Oops . . . sorry . . . got caught up in the passion of the moment.
Hitler was such a passionate speaker . . . I can see how you were inspired by him, PP
just as the original Progressive Party was inspired by him about a hundred years ago.
Besides, the Right Wing disconnect with reality is obvious beyond any given study. Just look at Fox. They exist for the sole purpose of presenting unreality as if it was "news".
And by the way, 100 years ago Hitler was 23 years old and living in obscurity in Vienna. American Progressives were in no way inspired by Hitler, nor did they share his views on anything. If you really want to find a Nazi analogue, look to the Tea Party. They want to destroy their own government too.
South Carolina:
We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.
Mississippi:
Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the w...
South Carolina:
We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.
Mississippi:
Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin.
(PS That IS a funny clip, I must admit.)
Perhaps you're right. Conservatives would have held a prayer vigil and waited for God to save them.
What we are certain of is those conservatives are still on that escalator waiting for God to get it moving again.
They used them against Iran.
They used them against the Kurds.
Clinton bombed them in 98.
Hillary and Biden, along with other leading Dems leading up the the Iraq war said this, in UNISON.
"Iraq, left wth nuclear, biologica and chemical weapons in not acceptable to the American People."
AND WHEN NONE WERE FOUND IT WAS ALL BUSH'S FAULT?
It was not Bush's fault that none were found. None were there, and Bush knew that before he lied to Congress to get us into a war
You are the PERFECT example of what this survey found. It's ten years later and you STILL are buying into the proven lies.
And the funniest part is that we've known for years that there were no WMDs in Iraq yet you and the other low capacity conservatives are STILL arguing the point!
You've beaten it to the point where it's not even fit for dog food.
I'm retired so I have nothing better to do . . . you?
You admit that Clinton was wrong, bwaa haa haa.
WERE YOU UPSET THE DAY CLINTON BOMBED THEM IN 98?
Oh so funny.
How come no one remembers it was Jimmy Carter who started the "warm fuzzy" relationship with Saddam to get back at Iran for embarrassing him with the hostage situation?