
Supreme Court Says Buy Health Insurance Or Be Taxed More. Do you agree?
ServantOfAllah
2012/06/28 14:15:13
|
|
|||||
|
107 votes
|
|
26% | |||
|
260 votes
|
|
64% | |||
|
40 votes
|
|
10% | |||
The Supreme court ruled that while Congress cannot make you get health insurance, you can be taxed more if you don't. Do you agree with their verdict?
Please be kind and rave this post so more readers will see it. Thank you.
Please be kind and rave this post so more readers will see it. Thank you.
Top Opinion
-
Philo-CommieHater! 2012/06/28 16:43:27I disagree with the verdict.+35Completely unconstitutional. SCOTUS cannot institute a tax, neither can POTUS. Bad law, worse medicine. Welcome to the USSA, comrades!























I am going to be watching the life expectancies of Japan after the earthquake disaster in 2011. My point being that there are many other causes of decreased life expectancy than lack of insurance and health care alone. I've scarcely used any health-care in my life. In fact, I am the only one my age at work who isn't on prescription medication of any kind. That's because I made other choices in my youth that benefited my health. None of them involved my doctor.
And of course the environment influences our health too. Neither we nor the Japanese can control earthquakes and tsunamis.
One of the problems with the insurance companies now is that they are dictating horrible birth conditions for mothers. There are just too many c-sections in the US, and too much intervention from the medical staff. If that doesn't change, morbidities and mortalities in the US from birth complications aren't going to change either.
Everything done in a US hosital setting is designed for the purpose of staff, not the mother and the baby. And one reason that women can't opt out of the hospital birth setting is that their insurance won't allow it. They have paid all of this money for insurance a...
I am going to be watching the life expectancies of Japan after the earthquake disaster in 2011. My point being that there are many other causes of decreased life expectancy than lack of insurance and health care alone. I've scarcely used any health-care in my life. In fact, I am the only one my age at work who isn't on prescription medication of any kind. That's because I made other choices in my youth that benefited my health. None of them involved my doctor.
And of course the environment influences our health too. Neither we nor the Japanese can control earthquakes and tsunamis.
One of the problems with the insurance companies now is that they are dictating horrible birth conditions for mothers. There are just too many c-sections in the US, and too much intervention from the medical staff. If that doesn't change, morbidities and mortalities in the US from birth complications aren't going to change either.
Everything done in a US hosital setting is designed for the purpose of staff, not the mother and the baby. And one reason that women can't opt out of the hospital birth setting is that their insurance won't allow it. They have paid all of this money for insurance and they don't have the funds to elect for birth outside of a hospital setting. I respectfully submit to you that this appears to be a collusion between insurance companies and hospitals.--And if it isn't, then regardless, it appears to be, and it is one and the same to women.
What I learned during my first homebirth, was not to let my excitement overcome my need to rest. The minute I had my bloody show, I called my family and in an immature attempt to "speed up" the delivery, I started walking. My son had no intention of being "sped up" and to this day, he refuses to be hurried along."
After a couple hours of nothing happening, I was exhausted, and fortunately, because I was at home, I just fell back to sleep and woke up between contractions and then went back to sleep. But that is not an option for laboring women in hospitals.
I was walking to the cafeteria one night, and I happened into a woman in labor who was walking and in tears. I asked her what was wrong and she said that her doctor had put her on a two hour walk. After that, she would be be put in a hospital bed and the entire protocols of that hospital's birth process would be carried out step by step, minute by minute. Her pain and fatigue would be managed by drugs. There needs to be a total revamp of birth and delivery education in the US, so that the process doesn't benefit the hospital, instead of the patient. Because all of the health insurance in the world isn't going to change the culture of greed that is affecting women and children in our nation.
Read this study from Harvard Medical School about bankruptcies caused by health care costs:
http://www.businessweek.com/b...
"Medical problems caused 62% of all personal bankruptcies filed in the U.S. in 2007, according to a study by Harvard researchers. And in a finding that surprised even the researchers, 78% of those filers had medical insurance at the start of their illness, including 60.3% who had private coverage, not Medicare or Medicaid."
"Medically related bankruptcies have been rising steadily for decades. In 1981, only 8% of families filing for bankruptcy cited a serious medical problem as the reason, while a 2001 stu...
Read this study from Harvard Medical School about bankruptcies caused by health care costs:
http://www.businessweek.com/b...
"Medical problems caused 62% of all personal bankruptcies filed in the U.S. in 2007, according to a study by Harvard researchers. And in a finding that surprised even the researchers, 78% of those filers had medical insurance at the start of their illness, including 60.3% who had private coverage, not Medicare or Medicaid."
"Medically related bankruptcies have been rising steadily for decades. In 1981, only 8% of families filing for bankruptcy cited a serious medical problem as the reason, while a 2001 study of bankruptcies in five states by the same researchers found that illness or medical bills contributed to 50% of all filings."
"""Unless you're Warren Buffett, your family is just one serious illness away from bankruptcy.""
The way things work now is that the health insurance company decides what procedures are covered and which ones are denied. They have devised a hundred different ways to deny claims. I know this because I worked for one of the top five largest health insurance companies for seven years. The pre-existing clause that was used extensively by insurance companies will be gone in 2014.
"Let me get this straight . . . We're going to be "gifted" with a health care plan we are forced to purchase & fined if we don't, which purportedly covers at least ten million more people without adding a single new doctor, but provides for 16,000 new IRS agensts, written by a committee whose chairman says he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that didn't read it but exempted themselves from it, and signed by a Dumbo President who smokes, with funding administrerd by a treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, for which we'll be taxed for four years before any benefits take effect, by a government which has already bankrupted Social Secuirty and Medicare, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that's broke!!!"
Liberalism is a mental disorder. Statism is a death sentence.
************************ LOCK AND LOAD FULLY ARMED AND READY **********************
MAKE ME TAKE OBAMA CARE IF YOU CAN..
QUOTE: " SCREW YOU AND YOU COME YOURSELF AND MAKE ME "
The WHO finds France gives the best health care, followed by Italy, Spain, Oman, Austria and Japan. The U.S., (up to now), spends a higher portion of GDP on healthcare, but ranks 37th out of 191 countries! We rank 14th, behind ALL European "Socialist medicine" countries in preventable death! AND 49th in the world in life expectancy!
What should be HUGELY important, to the Religious Right especially, but to ALL, is the fact that the U.S. ranks 174th in TOTAL INFANT DEATHS per 1000 live births! THAT'S a LOT of "unintentional abortions", or should we say,"preventable abortions"! You'd ALL do better to protest that old system, than abortion clinics! Obama has done a great thing and , after all, you shouldn't object to paying a "tax" for "saving all those babies...should you??
Liberalism is a mental disorder. Statism is a death sentence.
Try this: http://www.npr.org/2011/10/14...
Oh, sorry, as a registered nurse and hospital risk manager, this might also be to confusing and complicated to read, right sweetie?
Yes, darling, honey, sugar pie, your idiocy & poor breeding are not lost on me. ;-)
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/What...
Liberalism is a mental disorder. Statism is a death sentence. There is NO "hope" in either.