"... Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional... "
As much as I've hated seeing 0bama, the Senate, and the House beat the Constitution like a whipped dog, I hate it even more seeing the Supreme Court treating it this way. Despite 0bama's appointments to the SC and Judge Ginsburg, I have always previously had great respect for the SC.
Now I have very little respect for any of them.
Supreme Court INVALIDATES health care law? Say what?
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2012/06/30 18:24:16
|
|
|||||
|
58 votes
|
|
57% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
16% | |||
|
13 votes
|
|
13% | |||
|
15 votes
|
|
15% | |||
Nick Purpura, the author of the linked article, filed the most comprehensive anti-Obamacare lawsuit that anyone ever filed, in any court (Purpura v Sibelius, 11-7275). In this piece, he of course excoriates John Roberts, as did the conservative dissenters (Kennedy, Scalia, Alito, and Thomas JJ, jointly!), for rewriting the law to save it. (And in the process giving the Congress an unlimited taxing power that sets at naught every protection against the arbitrary deprivation of property without due process of law. The only thing the government cannot arbitrarily do to you is execute you or confine you.)
Have a look at the Purpura case. It lists nineteen separate violations of the Constitution and monumental inconsistencies with existing law.
The big point that Purpura makes in this piece is: John Roberts said that this is a tax. OK. But this tax originated in the Senate. Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads:
All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
So what really happened here? Well: after Scott Brown replaced Ted Kennedy, the House simply took an unrelated bill, stripped it of its contents and short title, put in the Senate language (even the "In the Senate of the United States" heading), and then "deemed it passed" in the vote on the House Rule. Classic bait-and-switch.
But Judge Roger Vinson of the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida has already said that the bill originated in the Senate. What about that?
That finding stands and is not controverted. So Mr. Purpura says, and I agree with him, that his case deserves a reargument. And more broadly speaking, Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional.
Have a look at the Purpura case. It lists nineteen separate violations of the Constitution and monumental inconsistencies with existing law.
The big point that Purpura makes in this piece is: John Roberts said that this is a tax. OK. But this tax originated in the Senate. Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads:
All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
So what really happened here? Well: after Scott Brown replaced Ted Kennedy, the House simply took an unrelated bill, stripped it of its contents and short title, put in the Senate language (even the "In the Senate of the United States" heading), and then "deemed it passed" in the vote on the House Rule. Classic bait-and-switch.
But Judge Roger Vinson of the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida has already said that the bill originated in the Senate. What about that?
That finding stands and is not controverted. So Mr. Purpura says, and I agree with him, that his case deserves a reargument. And more broadly speaking, Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional.
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/06/30...
It's not a tax on inactivity, it's just a tax like any other. This is exactly what the court did when considering social security, they ruled it a tax. So Roberts, goes with the leftists and enrages almost everyone, whipping up a frenzy to repeal the act, and the lefties helped him! He also put any notion or a partisan court aside, threw out the commerce clause issue completely (that was the real problem) and told the leftists they can't withhold Medicare money if the state doesn't impliment Medicaid expansion. If you don't pay the tax, there's no way to collect it except from a refund.
No precedent is set with this ruling, Roberts is saying "REPEAL THE ACT" loud and clear. The PPACA has been defanged, and the commerce clause can't be used to force commerce. The country is in an uproar and I'll bet my last buck the act is repealed. And he did it with the help of the Marxist judges who agree and admit it's a tax, showing the self proclaimed "progressives" in both houses and the president, LIED to the country to pass it, saying all along "It's not a tax".
Roberts is good, damn good.
There is nothing stoping the leftist from taxing for inactivity all they have to do is look at this law as a precedence and even now they want to mandate auto companies to make electric cars and put Doctors in Unions.
If this law stands and I hope your right that it gets repealed. There will be nothing stopping the government from mandating what we eat or anything else we do.
We have very few people in the Republican party that will do much to repeal this law right now. Sure they are going to "try" but they already admit defeat. What they should be doing is defund it immediately. There is no talk of that of course. There is gutless leadership in the Republican Party and the Dems have been running rings around them for years.
Justice Roberts is a coward and a traitor.
It will be repealed, where there was outrage, now there is galvanized rebellion against this act, I'm not worried.
Just to prove the Constitution is just as strong as it every was the moron squard, aka Republicans can try to repeal the bill. Lots of luck, they don't have the votes and anyone with half a brain knows it. So again, just more bitching and bellyaching from the right and pandering to their supporters who ofter are brain damaged. So what else is new?
The Constitution is all but dead and Obama has been ignoring it when it gets in his way. But you Libtards conviniently ignore that. Not to mention allowing gun walking into the hands of Drug Cartels causing the death of Ferderal Agents and Mexican Citizens. Oh, but the Great Messiah Obie Dell Sol can do anything because he is " the one he has been waiting for" right? Libtard moron.
The Drede Scott decision upholding Slavery.
The Supreme Court Desicion to make internment camps for U.S. Born Japanese legal?
Roe v Wade.
You are a complete moron. It is the people that will decide this. It isn't over yet, Obie Del Sol the murderer have to win re-election. Because of this immoral law he is going to have an even tougher time.
Oh yes moron Libtard, you can enjoy your little victory for now. But remember, all glory is fleeting...Idiot.
Now that we have a Dictatorship and no Constitution, why do we need a Supreme Court? By the same token, since we haven't had a Congressional Budget for three and a half years, why do we need a Congressional Budget Office (CBO)?
.
Why not clean this up and type something coherent?
I hope that does not happen! Let me tell you why! We've had President after President in past years clearly moving our country to an European form of Socialism. A "spreading of the wealth" in a country that was never to be a "Welfare State” model to begin with. For it was Thomas Jefferson who so spoke, "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."
This coming November will mark one of two directions for our country to take. Those two directions have NEVER been as pronounced or real as they are now! Should the majority of Americans desire to do away with what our forefathers had in mind when they founded our Constitution....... obama will be re-elected! Should we desire to have our America back as the Capitalistic country that it was, we will elect Romney! NOTHING is in between! The person who wins this election will set our course for the next 50 years of what is will become!
Me..... Im far too old for it to matter! However, I pray we wi...
I hope that does not happen! Let me tell you why! We've had President after President in past years clearly moving our country to an European form of Socialism. A "spreading of the wealth" in a country that was never to be a "Welfare State” model to begin with. For it was Thomas Jefferson who so spoke, "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."
This coming November will mark one of two directions for our country to take. Those two directions have NEVER been as pronounced or real as they are now! Should the majority of Americans desire to do away with what our forefathers had in mind when they founded our Constitution....... obama will be re-elected! Should we desire to have our America back as the Capitalistic country that it was, we will elect Romney! NOTHING is in between! The person who wins this election will set our course for the next 50 years of what is will become!
Me..... Im far too old for it to matter! However, I pray we will defeat the Govt run health takeover by electing Romney!
For IF we were to not have this election to be about obamacare, then perhaps we would simply evade the question of what kind of country we want to be?
See, he is NOT as stupid as he looked.
And he also knew as a tax it would be bad for the democrats.
Reuters Poll: 73% of Independents Oppose Obamacare
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfr...
Obie can kiss his ass goodbye.
I'm just hoping that feeling is the same from many, many more blacks! :)
Between his support for gays, Obamacare tax, his siding against religious institutions, his lack of job creation for them all prove to them that he is not for them, but against them.
I think only the hard core racist types will vote for him. The rest will stay home.
Our forefathers left foreign lands because their govt ruled over the desires of "We, the People!"
That is now happening here... they want us to conform to a "New Order" where all people are controlled by what allowance govt wishes upon them. Joseph Stalin convinced a large class of peasants that the Business owners, bankers, inventors, money makers were their worst enemies! He convinced them that IF but ONLY govt could cease their money, cease their power, cease their collective accomplishments... the poor could then be on "EASY" street and live just like those they convinced them to hate!
Unfortunately.... it did not work out like that! :( For once the educated did not manage the banks... they failed! Once the business owner did not control the business, it failed! Once the Farmer did not plant, rotate or harvest the crops, they failed!
More than 10 MILLION people died in the streets from starvation the years that followed Joseph Stalin! Yet he lived in absolute luxury! :(