"... Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional... "
As much as I've hated seeing 0bama, the Senate, and the House beat the Constitution like a whipped dog, I hate it even more seeing the Supreme Court treating it this way. Despite 0bama's appointments to the SC and Judge Ginsburg, I have always previously had great respect for the SC.
Now I have very little respect for any of them.
Supreme Court INVALIDATES health care law? Say what?
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2012/06/30 18:24:16
|
|
|||||
|
58 votes
|
|
57% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
16% | |||
|
13 votes
|
|
13% | |||
|
15 votes
|
|
15% | |||
Nick Purpura, the author of the linked article, filed the most comprehensive anti-Obamacare lawsuit that anyone ever filed, in any court (Purpura v Sibelius, 11-7275). In this piece, he of course excoriates John Roberts, as did the conservative dissenters (Kennedy, Scalia, Alito, and Thomas JJ, jointly!), for rewriting the law to save it. (And in the process giving the Congress an unlimited taxing power that sets at naught every protection against the arbitrary deprivation of property without due process of law. The only thing the government cannot arbitrarily do to you is execute you or confine you.)
Have a look at the Purpura case. It lists nineteen separate violations of the Constitution and monumental inconsistencies with existing law.
The big point that Purpura makes in this piece is: John Roberts said that this is a tax. OK. But this tax originated in the Senate. Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads:
All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
So what really happened here? Well: after Scott Brown replaced Ted Kennedy, the House simply took an unrelated bill, stripped it of its contents and short title, put in the Senate language (even the "In the Senate of the United States" heading), and then "deemed it passed" in the vote on the House Rule. Classic bait-and-switch.
But Judge Roger Vinson of the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida has already said that the bill originated in the Senate. What about that?
That finding stands and is not controverted. So Mr. Purpura says, and I agree with him, that his case deserves a reargument. And more broadly speaking, Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional.
Have a look at the Purpura case. It lists nineteen separate violations of the Constitution and monumental inconsistencies with existing law.
The big point that Purpura makes in this piece is: John Roberts said that this is a tax. OK. But this tax originated in the Senate. Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads:
All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
So what really happened here? Well: after Scott Brown replaced Ted Kennedy, the House simply took an unrelated bill, stripped it of its contents and short title, put in the Senate language (even the "In the Senate of the United States" heading), and then "deemed it passed" in the vote on the House Rule. Classic bait-and-switch.
But Judge Roger Vinson of the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida has already said that the bill originated in the Senate. What about that?
That finding stands and is not controverted. So Mr. Purpura says, and I agree with him, that his case deserves a reargument. And more broadly speaking, Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional.
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/06/30...
The only reason you still hear echoes in your ears is because there is a vast empty wasteland between your ears where normal people have brains.
There is an entire minority looney wing, I like to call them the Hermanites.
Just so you know when I talk about baggers.... I'm talking about the entire lot of the wackos. ;o)
How about you "pucker up, and lube on"? I would ask you to use your common sense, but, seeing as you don't have any...
I say this because a majority of "we the people" elected Obama based upon his campaign promise that he would reform the healthcare system. He kept his word and laid the first brick of the foundation to do just that.
So in reality, he did do exactly what "WE THE PEOPLE" wanted!
now the govt .admin gets their care for 100.00 $ a mo. premiums "med / dent / phar. ..
now this plan isnt good enough for them ..so why do the people have to take it ?
congress shall pass no laws that dont effect them as well ...... food for thought ???
It is however the first step finally in the right direction. Many laws and programs that benefit the greater good in this country look nothing like their first iterations. I expect this one to be no different. It will be changed and improved upon as time goes on.
too bad the people had nothing to say about it ( though "we" were supposed to review it before it was voted on or signed ) that was another promise ......that wasnt fullfilled ...!
and a bill one person ( or olargie ) put into words ....for we the people ...!
would you sign a contract or enter into an agreement without reading it ?
and another step towards socialism ...
Here's a news flash, since the two provsions I mentioned are so popular the Republic Party leadership has already said they are going to fiddle with them. So tell me, what's all the noise about other that to try to stir up the base? Besides the other stuff in the bill doesn't take effect until 2013 and 2014,so how can you dislike something that hasn't even happened yet?
People with pre-existing conditions can buy insurance, it simply costs more. Insurance is a private industry, if they don't want to insure high risk, they don't have to. You could always start a company insuring those that have pre-existing conditions, why don't you? The sole reason that the insurance companies are taking these cases is that they will be PAID to do it, through taxing the masses with Obamacare.
Yes, I don't care, it's not my business. As I said, I'm an independent, and for the record I'm not rich nor do I have any real use for large sums of money. Use your childish rhetoric on someone else.
"I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. That is why right, temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil triumphant." - Martin Luther King Jr. (1929 - 1968)