"... Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional... "
As much as I've hated seeing 0bama, the Senate, and the House beat the Constitution like a whipped dog, I hate it even more seeing the Supreme Court treating it this way. Despite 0bama's appointments to the SC and Judge Ginsburg, I have always previously had great respect for the SC.
Now I have very little respect for any of them.
Supreme Court INVALIDATES health care law? Say what?
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2012/06/30 18:24:16
|
|
|||||
|
58 votes
|
|
57% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
16% | |||
|
13 votes
|
|
13% | |||
|
15 votes
|
|
15% | |||
Nick Purpura, the author of the linked article, filed the most comprehensive anti-Obamacare lawsuit that anyone ever filed, in any court (Purpura v Sibelius, 11-7275). In this piece, he of course excoriates John Roberts, as did the conservative dissenters (Kennedy, Scalia, Alito, and Thomas JJ, jointly!), for rewriting the law to save it. (And in the process giving the Congress an unlimited taxing power that sets at naught every protection against the arbitrary deprivation of property without due process of law. The only thing the government cannot arbitrarily do to you is execute you or confine you.)
Have a look at the Purpura case. It lists nineteen separate violations of the Constitution and monumental inconsistencies with existing law.
The big point that Purpura makes in this piece is: John Roberts said that this is a tax. OK. But this tax originated in the Senate. Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads:
All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
So what really happened here? Well: after Scott Brown replaced Ted Kennedy, the House simply took an unrelated bill, stripped it of its contents and short title, put in the Senate language (even the "In the Senate of the United States" heading), and then "deemed it passed" in the vote on the House Rule. Classic bait-and-switch.
But Judge Roger Vinson of the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida has already said that the bill originated in the Senate. What about that?
That finding stands and is not controverted. So Mr. Purpura says, and I agree with him, that his case deserves a reargument. And more broadly speaking, Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional.
Have a look at the Purpura case. It lists nineteen separate violations of the Constitution and monumental inconsistencies with existing law.
The big point that Purpura makes in this piece is: John Roberts said that this is a tax. OK. But this tax originated in the Senate. Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads:
All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives.
So what really happened here? Well: after Scott Brown replaced Ted Kennedy, the House simply took an unrelated bill, stripped it of its contents and short title, put in the Senate language (even the "In the Senate of the United States" heading), and then "deemed it passed" in the vote on the House Rule. Classic bait-and-switch.
But Judge Roger Vinson of the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida has already said that the bill originated in the Senate. What about that?
That finding stands and is not controverted. So Mr. Purpura says, and I agree with him, that his case deserves a reargument. And more broadly speaking, Mr. Chief Justice Roberts just invalidated ObamaCare when he sought to save it. Otherwise he just declared the Constitution unconstitutional.
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/06/30...
Uh huh . . . But according to all wise pundits on FOX "NEWS," the ruling is supposed to be the best thing that could ever happen to Republicans, because it will "galvanize America" into voting out Obama and most Democrats.
And of course when that happens, all the Repugs have to do is rescind the act.
But if it's the best thing that could happen to Republicans, then why are they so p*ssed?
Those herd animals are barely even human.
Edit: I'm guessing you are an American overseas, if not, just piss off.
The government is just like baseball, for years it was corrupt and nobody did anything about it because the players were doing things that had never been done before but they were all doing it illegally and behind closed doors. But finally the people wanted no more of it and now they are all under the microscope of rules and are punished if caught. This is what's happening to our government now, the people are tired of what's been going on and are about to go back to the way our founding fathers wanted it to be. No loopholes, just plain English.
the sheeples will buy it ,,,but the conserv's know better ...!
so well put the sheeples against the conservs AGAIN !
and the justice roberts ( if cleaver enough ,,he can confuse the brightest with conjecture ) and will in essence invalidate the whole thing & pass it as a tax ..but not a tax ..and no penalties ..but is enforceable ,,,but how ?
how have you been ?
Please try to act as if you have the common sense the good lord gave you!
And We The People of the Tea Party will not stand by while this "shot heard around the world" still echoes in our ears.
One small battle in whats gonna be a big war, and it has just begun.
We may have different ideas on how to steer this boat that we are all in together.... But I accecpt and respect the fact that we are ALL IN TOGETHER.
The kind of a person that has those type beliefs is at war with the very concept of liberty, personal rights, democracy and divine destiny.
The differences between the two sides is akin to the differences that led to the civil war. Both sides were Americans pitted against Americans. To be sure, I am NOT saying this war will be waged the same or that slavery is the centerpiece.
But there is a war going on for the direction of this country and the left is, in my mind and of those of plenty of others, the side wanting to keep slavery alive.
Please do explain how you can have that much cognitive dissonance?!?
[Exerpts from Wikipedia]
So, Im a righty attacking the right?
And here I was all this time thinking I was against the agenda of the left.
.
You and yours are attacking me as a conservative, does it not make you a fascist too then?
How about this, before labeling me, make sure the shoe doesnt fit you first?
Sounds just like the TeaOP to me! Just look at your post above where you talk about war with your fellow Americans if they don't believe as you do.... If you need more proof that is.
"The kind of a person that has those type beliefs is at war with the very concept of liberty, personal rights, democracy and divine destiny.
The differences between the two sides is akin to the differences that led to the civil war. Both sides were Americans pitted against Americans. To be sure, I am NOT saying this war will be waged the same or that slavery is the centerpiece.
But there is a war going on for the direction of this country and the left is, in my mind and of those of plenty of others, the side wanting to keep slavery alive."
http://news.investors.com/art...
http://finance.townhall.com/c...
Seriously?!?
You do realize that in the last decade we have just experienced the greatest depression since the 30's, right?
You do realize that there are people, PARENTS out there that are willing to check their pride (and political ideology) at the door in order to be able to feed their children, right?
And most importantly, you do realize that an increase in food stamps usage pales in comparison (not even remotely in the same universe) to the 400 years that people kept human beings as chattel and sold them as property in this country, right!
Nah, nothing there to compare.
Yup, there I go, using facts again. Not that it matters to you as you will no doubt strike at the source rather than the content anyway. It cant be helped if your Huff Post and MSNBC dont want to participate in actual reporting.
http://www.theblaze.com/stori...