Quantcast

Struggling Cities Turn Off the Lights: Ingenious or Dangerous?

SodaHead News 2012/01/02 02:02:25
You!
Add Photos & Videos
In tough economic times, cities have no choice but to cut costs everywhere they can. However, as a growing number of cities have decided to sacrifice streetlights, many residents feel that the budget tightening has gone way too far.

Highland Park, Michigan; Myrtle Creek, Oregon; Clintonville, Wisconsin; Brainerd, Minnesota; Santa Rosa, California; Rockford, Illinois: these are just a few of the many cities that have been pushed to do what was once unthinkable—turn off the streetlights in an attempt to stay afloat.

And unlike many other budget cuts, when things get dark people notice. In Highland Park, Michigan, which has removed all but 500 of the city’s 1,600 lights, many residents have felt the need to completely reorder their lives.

“When you come through at night, it’s scary; you have to wonder if anyone is lurking around waiting to catch you off your guard,” said 65-year-old Juanita Kennedy of Highland Park. “I don’t go out to get gas at night. I don’t run to any stores. I try to do everything in the daytime and to be back before night falls.”

Since the streetlight in front of her house was removed, Kennedy has also installed a security system and undergone training to carry a handgun. And she is not the only resident who’s concerned and making lifestyle changes.

Parents worry more about letting their children walk to school in the morning. Motorists complain that they can’t see pedestrians or potholes. And Greater St. Matthew Baptist Church had to move a Saturday evening bible study to 4 p.m. at the urging of congregants.

Yet, Highland Park officials say that they had no other choice; they had to remove the lights so that the DTE Energy company would forgive their accumulated debt of about $4 million.

We completely understand the residents' complaints, but sometimes, desperate times call for desperate measures.

What do you think about struggling cities turning off the lights? Ingenious or dangerous?

Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/30/us/cities-cost-c...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • MLor 2012/01/02 05:06:46
    Dangerous
    MLor
    +4
    Could be a problem. The time has passed to get prepared, but to those that still aren't ....what do ya think...maybe now?!
  • Rocko 2012/01/02 05:05:07
    Dangerous
    Rocko
    +2
    wow is this smart (sarcasm) lol
  • Jaiheena Star 2012/01/02 04:58:45
  • sheratan 2012/01/02 04:47:55 (edited)
    Dangerous
    sheratan
    +4
    Here is a better alternative to save money:

    Why don't they use solar lamps that recharge during the day and illuminate at night?
  • joe mauro sheratan 2012/01/02 05:30:31
    joe mauro
    +1
    the business men will be cutting each others throaths for that contract!
  • srini 2012/01/02 04:44:59
    Dangerous
    srini
    +5
    This is like trying to weld a pinprick in the water-main to save water while ignoring completely a set of 2" diameter holes!
  • MLor srini 2012/01/02 05:08:21
    MLor
    +1
    .....or plugging the side of the titanic with a piece of gum.
  • findthelight2000 2012/01/02 04:40:42
    Dangerous
    findthelight2000
    +3
    If those cities had planned ahead a little, they would already have the solar street lights and there wouldn't be a problem. But hey..., you can't convince the fossil fuel junkies!
  • tlee 2012/01/02 04:36:35
    Ingenious
    tlee
    +4
    then they never have to answer the real question; why do we never run out of money for illegals?.
  • BoomLover tlee 2012/01/02 05:48:43
    BoomLover
    +1
    Just wrote a letter to the Editor of our local paper asking that very same question!
  • Medulla Oblongata 2012/01/02 04:32:39
    Dangerous
    Medulla Oblongata
    +3
    It may seem like a good idea in theory, but what will happen when someone has an accident? Headlights can only illuminate so far. Not everyone has high beams, and those that do generally blind other drivers with them.
  • Icedragon1969 2012/01/02 04:21:45
    Ingenious
    Icedragon1969
    +3
    There's a reasonable limit. Beyond that the only purpose that streetlights serve is to paint targets on the victim. After all, how well can you see outside the little pool of light where the street lights are? You can't, but someone lurking out there can see you just fine. Turn out some of the lights and just start giving yourself a few minutes to let your eyes dark adapt before going for your walk.
  • Kyle Icedrag... 2012/01/02 05:18:21
    Kyle
    +1
    I gotta disagree with you there man, what about drivers? No streetlights mean they could easily hit somebody trying to cross the street. Also you could let your eyes adjust as much as you want but you'll never be able to see some thug coming up to you in darkness as well as you would with streetlights.
  • Icedrag... Kyle 2012/01/02 05:22:25
    Icedragon1969
    +1
    We'll just have to disagree then. I've never had trouble with either thanks to headlights and being alert.
  • Kyle Icedrag... 2012/01/02 05:27:22
    Kyle
    That's good for you but can say the same for everyone else?
  • Icedrag... Kyle 2012/01/02 05:29:42
    Icedragon1969
    +1
    Nope, but then I'm never in favor of protecting people from their own actions and lack of responsibility either.
  • Kyle Icedrag... 2012/01/02 05:38:35
    Kyle
    What about adolescents? They both lack responsibility and need protection from themselves. Are you in favor of just letting them go out there and get hurt?
  • Beat Ma... Icedrag... 2012/01/02 07:43:35
    Beat Magnum True Hero
    Where traffic safety is concerned, it's everyone's responsibility.
  • WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2012/01/02 04:18:45
    Dangerous
    WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA
    +4
    It is obviously dangerous. This is why we need people to be able to find JOBS and work, and pay taxes.
  • I NEED A HORSE 2012/01/02 04:01:55
  • Dangerous
    (▪‿▪)DoctorWhoGuru(▪‿▪)
  • BonnieDeutsch 2012/01/02 03:50:16
    Dangerous
    BonnieDeutsch
    +4
    Unbelievable really !
  • Lauralgentile 2012/01/02 03:23:40
    Ingenious
    Lauralgentile
    +2
    I think what ever people can do to save money do it!
  • Visipunkbot sXe 2012/01/02 03:22:38
    Ingenious
    Visipunkbot sXe
    +2
    Population control at it's finest!
  • Rob Visipun... 2012/01/02 06:23:50
    Rob
    LOL, so true.
  • Bob DiN Visipun... 2012/01/02 08:27:06
    Bob DiN
    Agreed.
  • Rusty Shackleford 2012/01/02 03:20:56
    Ingenious
    Rusty Shackleford
    +2
    Better than going further into debt.
  • Mrs Reckless 2012/01/02 02:59:59
    Ingenious
    Mrs Reckless
    +3
    That's what car headlights are for :)
  • realist 2012/01/02 02:54:27
    Ingenious
    realist
    +2
    we in the country do it all the time, grow some
  • Doreen realist 2012/01/02 05:52:39
    Doreen
    We in the country have a lot less people running around to mug us and a lot less vehicles screaming down our streets.
  • Patriotic 2012/01/02 02:28:30
    Dangerous
    Patriotic
    +5
    They can do so, as long as they are equipped to deal with the probable rise in crime. If you pay more officers overtime to deal with the rise in crime, then how much money have you really saved?
  • ☠ Live Free Or Die ☠ 2012/01/02 02:18:20
    Dangerous
    ☠ Live Free Or Die ☠
    +14
    I'm sure there are other places where they can trim the fat..
  • Chi~Cat ☠ Live ... 2012/01/02 06:05:28
    Chi~Cat
    +4
    Right at the politicians favorite Steak House~
  • merlins... ☠ Live ... 2012/01/02 19:51:08
    merlinskiss
    +3
    Around the waist of the city council and mayor comes to mind for starters...
  • shadow76 ☠ Live ... 2012/02/20 13:16:07
    shadow76
    +1
    Like cutting their politicians perks, it would probably save them a lot more money.
  • les_gvt 2012/01/02 02:17:30
    Ingenious
    les_gvt
    +7
    You don;t have to take them all down, just every other one, or only put them at intersections. and curves

    Lighting one's yard for security reasons is the owners responsibility

    Think of how much this will reduce our nations carbon footprint, and how much CO2 we will not emit
  • BoomLover les_gvt 2012/01/02 05:53:47
    BoomLover
    +2
    That term "Carbon footprint"...sounds pretty PC to me...how many really know what their "carbon footprint" actually is?
  • les_gvt BoomLover 2012/01/02 13:59:02 (edited)
    les_gvt
    all I know, Is I make mine as big as I can afford

    I like reminding the lefties that their cf never offends them when it is something done by the government, in all its infinite wisdom

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/21 22:53:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals