Quantcast

Straight Talk To Michelle Obama

steven 2012/07/02 19:21:06
You are here: Home / Commentary / A Letter to Michelle Obama
A Letter To Michelle Obama
JUNEYou are here: Home / Commentary / A Letter to Michelle Obama
A Letter To Michelle Obama
JUNE 30, 2012 BY 111 COMMENTS



Michelle Obama Jobs Stork SC A Letter to Michelle Obama


Dear Michelle,


On the day that your husband was elected, you said that you had never been proud of the United States until that day. For the last three and a half years, I have been observing your husband and you, and I feel that it is time I share my thoughts with you. The day your husband was elected was the first time I was ever ashamed of this country, and today I am even more ashamed.

I was ashamed then because your husband was not elected because he was the best qualified to do the job, or because he was the most intelligent, or even because anyone really thought he could get anything worthwhile done. The reason your husband was elected, the only reason, is because of the color of his skin. Your husband was chosen by the Democratic Party to be their “token black”, and that is the shame of the American public. We deserve better than a community organizer who seems to look down on his fellow Americans while bowing to an Arab leader. We deserve a president who was thoroughly vetted by his party and the media, not someone whom the DNC now admits was never even eligible for the job. There are many other men, Black, Hispanic, of Asian descent, Native American, and even Caucasian who are many times more qualified and eligible to be the president. If he had even a shred of self respect, Barack would resign and convince Joe Biden to do so as well, so that someone with a backbone could fix the mess your husband (NOT George Bush) has made much worse.

Your husband said he would bring unity to the country; instead, he has brought class warfare and fanned the flames of racism by saying that his son would look like Travon Martin. When the Pharisees asked Jesus what the greatest commandment was, he replied, “‘you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’” “This is the greatest foremost commandment.” “The second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’” “On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.”(Matt.22:37-40 NAS). Notice that there is no modifying clause in the second commandment “You shall love thy neighbor as yourself.” NOT “You shall love your neighbor as yourself, so long as his skin is the same color as yours or he does not make more money than you.” In our home, race is not an issue; everyone is welcome and treated respectfully. My mother raised me right; she taught me these verses and the golden rule “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” I have lived this way all my life and never judge others; it is God’s job to judge, not mine. There is a big difference between loving the person and accepting the sin; I can love the person and still hate the things they do. The media was quick to condemn Sarah Palin’s daughter for getting pregnant (or was it because she chose to have the baby?), but at least she owned up and took responsibility for her actions, which is something your husband has said publicly he would not make his daughters do in that same situation. No, he would rather have them murder their baby should they be so shortsighted as to get pregnant before they were ready.

Make no mistake here, please; through Christ, I love you and your family, but I hate what Barack has done to this wonderful country of ours. He has no need to apologize for an accidental burning of the Quran anymore than they would apologize for a deliberate burning of the Bible or our Constitution. In fact, as a nation, there is nothing he needs to apologize for on our behalf, but instead much he needs to apologize to us for. He needs to apologize to us for his blatant disregard for the Constitution, the very foundation of our government, and the freedoms guaranteed to us by that document. I have family members who fought to protect that document and what it stands for; yet you and your husband treat it like toilet paper for all the respect you show.

You are fond of quoting the Scripture in Luke that tells us that “To those to whom much has been given, from them much shall also be expected”, but then you take it out of context and tell us that means that the federal government has the right to take what one man earns and give it to the man who sits on his butt all day doing nothing. Sorry, but I do not think that is what Christ meant when he said “take care of the widows and orphans.” He also told us that God loves a cheerful (or willing) giver. He did not want to force us to do what we so willingly do out of love. In case you had not noticed, when there is a crisis (i.e. Katrina) the American people pull together to help each other faster and better than the government (i.e. FEMA) could.

The recent decision by the Supreme Court to uphold the individual mandate of the “Affordable” Care Act was equally shameful and has added one hundred-fold to the stress of my daily life. Stress that was not a part of my life until Barack took the office that by rights does not belong to him. My husband has non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, the treatments are expensive, and how long now before the committee decides that because he is not a “productive citizen” he cannot access the treatments he needs to stay alive? I clench my teeth at night wondering if he will be here when our daughter (now fifteen) walks down the aisle on her wedding day. When I had a heart attack last year, it was a Catholic-run hospital that picked up the greatest portion of the cost, allowing us to make payments on the rest when we could, not the government. Through the contraception mandate, Obamacare will shut down that hospital and hundreds like it, leaving people like me to fall between the cracks of your “perfect healthcare”.

I am also ashamed that the first family sees the Presidency as a lottery they won (how many vacations do you need in a year, really?) I have not had a job in two years, and our family would love to have a vacation in Europe, just one, someday. Yet your family has taken over seventeen vacations, at my last count, on the taxes people like me have paid. So, in effect, the middle class of America has been paying for you and your entourage of secretaries and secret service personnel to run around the world, shopping and sightseeing, when we cannot afford to go visit relatives who live in another state. Your husband’s policies have not created any jobs worth talking about, but they have kept businesses from creating jobs. Even a low-paying job would allow us the luxury of going to visit family.

So tell me Michelle, just what are you proud of? Are you proud of the fact that you are living in the White House because people did not want to be called racist? Or perhaps you are proud that your husband has chipped away at the civil liberties of the American taxpayers? Or perhaps you are proud of the race riots your husband instigated when he said that if he had a son he would look like Travon Martin, instead of keeping his mouth shut and letting the police handle the situation? The truth (whatever it is) will come out. I do not think there is anything that your husband has “accomplished” while in office that you should be proud of. Oh wait, I forgot all that golfing he has done that must have improved his game; I guess you can be proud of that.

In Christ Always,

Becky Smith

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Southern Man 2012/07/02 20:06:20
    Southern Man
    +9
    Great letter ... Becky Smith is right about 0bama he has set race relations back about 50 years or so ... She is right about winning because of skin color ... She is right about 0bama not being qualified .. That crack about Travon Martin .. My question is would he act like Travon ... All and all 0bama has not done one thing for the good of this country

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Lanikai 2012/07/02 20:21:16
    Lanikai
    +4
    bravo,

    The two of them are a shame and a disgrace,.
  • joseph ... Lanikai 2012/07/03 02:17:08
    joseph digristina
    +1
    So are people like you who disrespect the office and the man with your outrageous lies and misinformation. Some of you should be tried for treason.
  • Lanikai joseph ... 2012/07/03 13:55:04
    Lanikai
    +1
    Piss off, libby, those two vile clowns need to move to his homeland of kenya, and GTF out of here.
  • joseph ... Lanikai 2012/07/04 02:41:32
    joseph digristina
    +1
    I retract that. You should be tried for ignorance , stupidity, vileness, intolerance and treason. bgtr
  • Southern Man 2012/07/02 20:06:20
    Southern Man
    +9
    Great letter ... Becky Smith is right about 0bama he has set race relations back about 50 years or so ... She is right about winning because of skin color ... She is right about 0bama not being qualified .. That crack about Travon Martin .. My question is would he act like Travon ... All and all 0bama has not done one thing for the good of this country
  • gregaj7 2012/07/02 20:05:44
    gregaj7
    +7
    Reasoning with demons never works.
  • joseph ... gregaj7 2012/07/03 02:19:00
    joseph digristina
    +1
    That's why I never take conservatives seriously. You are devils. aser
  • gregaj7 joseph ... 2012/07/03 02:22:26
    gregaj7
    +1
    Perspective rules.
  • TheBadOne 2012/07/02 20:00:45
    TheBadOne
    +4
    He wasn't elected because he was black; this country was so sick of W's mismanagement that the Dems took all the offices. This great country died on 9/11. Since then, we've waged war on ourselves and have become more divided then ever, thanks in a huge part to the MSM establishments that report half truths to suppoLrt their point of view instead of maintaining neutrality.
  • steven TheBadOne 2012/07/02 20:03:45
    steven
    +4
    Reagan united people. Obama divides them at every chance he gets. I don't care for either party, to be frank, but there is no sense blaming Bush for Obama putting the pedal to the metal and driving us into the GROUND, not just the ditch.
  • TheBadOne steven 2012/07/02 20:23:56
    TheBadOne
    +2
    Dude, from where I was at after 9/11, it wasn't the liberals saying "YOU'RE EITHER WITH US OR AGAINST US!" instead of having dialogue as opposed to why this happened. Conservatives bullied others about their viewpoint and made certain that everyone knew that even remotely being critical of GWB was tantamount to being a terrorist. After Obama was elected, however, the Conservative MSM changed their tone and instead of viewing criticism of the president as "treasonous" now view criticizing the president as "Patriotic." I don't view the current president as being a divider, I see the media playing up the division we have and we buy into it hook, line, and sinker.

    The reason I plan on voting third party this election is largely because that between GWB and Obama, nothing has changed with the exception of the passing of a very large healthcare mandate that is deserving of its critics.
  • steven TheBadOne 2012/07/02 20:35:06
    steven
    Liberals never bully? Saul Alinsky would be proud you drank the whole pitcher. Criticizing our elected has never been treason and even Teddy Roosevelt said as much. From as far back as Ben Franklin they said it was our DUTY to hold their feet to the fire. Obama became a divider as soon as he took office. He promised to bring our troops home as his first act and has not done so. That divides people. He said our energy prices (and consequently our food and more) must 'skyrocket' and he stopped ALL drilling in the Gulf because of ONE rig. That divided people. He ignores what blacks do and castigates whites. That divides people. He is a communist. That divides people. Now, where have you bee watching from SINCE 9/11? The MSM has been FOR Obama almost all along, until it became fashionable to occasionally say something negative. They are as divisive as anyone in the White House on race relations. I agree about the third party and hope Ron Paul gets the nod. If he does not, I will write his name in or if he does drop out, I will write in Gary Johnson, Libertarian endorsed by Ron Paul. No matter who gets it, he will only be president of a CORPORATION known as the UNITED STATES, not the legitimate Republic. That republic was vacated by the south 152 years ago and was only reinhabited in 2010, lawfully. We have a president and he is not Obama.

    http://republicfortheunitedst...
  • Jim steven 2012/07/02 22:44:32
    Jim
    +2
    I hope you realize, that a vote for anyone else other than Romney, who I don't like either, is a vote for Obama. So if all you libertarians vote for anyone other than Romney, don't be shocked when Obama gets re-elected. Romney will be under a lot of pressure to do what is right so he can get re-elected. We can always change after four years.
  • TheBadOne Jim 2012/07/02 23:01:31
    TheBadOne
    I know more "Dems" who are voting Libertarian this upcoming election than in years past. A vote for Gary Johnson isn't a vote for Obama, a vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Gary Johnson. We need to break away from the two-party monopoly sometime or we're going to be stuck between not being equal and not being free.
  • TheBadOne steven 2012/07/02 22:50:02
    TheBadOne
    FYI: Gary Johnson's on the ballot in all 50 states and is getting my full support come November. I was hoping the GOP would have ran with him after the primaries but alas...

    Oh, and I never meant to make it sound like the Liberal media has taken Obama to task like they did with Bush, because they haven't. We're still in a war that he got a Nobel Peace prize for in order to get out of. But in terms of being for divisive, I can't honestly say either of them are better of the other. It all depends on which side of the coin you were on when either is/was in charge. As far as Obama being a communist, I disagree. I view him as another crony capitalist who is using the government to fund the objectives of the Democratic party; something that won't be resolved by merely re-electing Republicans because they'll do the same.

    But to say that the Conservative MSM hasn't had anything to do with the divisive culture we have is a mistake. Hannity, O'Reilly, and Rush have certainly made certain to broadcast the whole "Us Vs. Them" mentality and have made absolutely certain that they vehemently squash not just the argument that differs from their opinion but also the character of anyone who dared believe differently. MSNBC, lusting for ratings, now does the same only for a different side. Neither brings actual discourse to America, it just makes us believe there's issues that keep us divided. Can a divided house stand? I think you know the answer to that.
  • relic TheBadOne 2012/07/02 20:39:59
    relic
    +2
    Wow, you have the most selective memory ever.
  • joseph ... relic 2012/07/03 02:23:16
    joseph digristina
    THAT HONOR BELONGS TO REPUBLICANS.
  • joseph ... steven 2012/07/03 02:21:49
    joseph digristina
    Reagan had a Democratic party that worked with him for the betterment of the country. You Cons haven't co-operated with this President on one thing ,then you turn around and accuse HIM of being divisive. Such hypocrisy, I have never seen in politics before.
  • Lanikai joseph ... 2012/07/03 13:57:39
    Lanikai
    Please keep in mind that your king has a clear and full majority his first two years and the dems had to BRIBE each other to vote in healthcare.

    So, stop blaming repubs, your team had a super majority and STILL didn't pass a budget or get anything useful done-unless you count GIVING billions to companies who went bankrupt right away.
  • joseph ... Lanikai 2012/07/04 02:51:56
    joseph digristina
    Liar. You know he needed Republican votes in the Senate to avoid the filibuster and you know he rarely got them, Go lie to your Con friends since I know no liberal would have anything to go with a hater and deliberate liar like you. liar
  • Jim TheBadOne 2012/07/02 22:34:05
    Jim
    +1
    He was elected because he was black. He had no platform whatsoever. Hope is not a platform. He never said what he meant by hope nor did the liberal media ever ask him what he meant by hope. Only now we know what he meant by hope. He hopes America becomes Communist under Sharia law. He is by far much more worse then President Bush ever was and much worse than Jimmy Carter was and I never thought that would ever be possible. I guess that's why the Republicans took control of the U.S. Assembly in the last congressional election. Also, the Democrats have had control of both houses of congress for the last two years of President Bush's last term. So get off your high horse and and see the truth. Under Obama, the economy has tanked;, unemployment has risen to an actual double digit number and the National Debt has more than tripled. It is all Obama's fault. But you are looking at skin color, not the facts.
  • Jim TheBadOne 2012/07/02 22:38:26
    Jim
    +1
    Oh and by the way, if Clinton had acted upon the first bombing of the World Trade Center, the bombing of our Embassy in Lebanon and the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole I doubt if 9/11 would ever have happened.
  • Lanikai Jim 2012/07/03 13:58:21 (edited)
    Lanikai
    Or if he had acted on any of the three times osama was offered to him, it could have been prevented.

    Pass the buck dems-create the problem, then blame it on the other guy.
  • SoCalEx-Dem 2012/07/02 19:59:57
  • David Wallace 2012/07/02 19:55:29
    David Wallace
    +2
    Amen. Shame on the Obamas - hijacked our country and trashing it as if it were their own.
  • steven David W... 2012/07/02 19:59:04
    steven
    +4
    Trailer Trash comes in all colors, but I have no doubt that some has been promoted to the White House. And that is not racist, but truth as I see it.
  • Buzzymuzzwelle 2012/07/02 19:54:32
    Buzzymuzzwelle
    +6
    November Folks November. If Obama wins, kiss America and Freedom goodbye.Buzzy
  • steven Buzzymu... 2012/07/02 19:56:46 (edited)
    steven
    Agreed, but Romney is just Mini-Me. If not Ron Paul, I will vote Gary Johnson, as none of them will be president of anything but a corporation called the UNITED STATES, not the legitimate republic. See:

    http://republicfortheunitedst...
  • relic steven 2012/07/02 20:41:25
    relic
    +1
    A lot of us voted for Ross Perot too.
  • jasmine1 relic 2012/07/02 21:47:16
    jasmine1
    +1
    A vote for a third party candidate will be a vote for Barry. Ross Perot is the reason Clinton won. Those that voted for him would have voted for Bush if Perot didn't run. So a vote for Perot took votes from Bush not Clinton and it will be the same Thing in 2012.
  • steven jasmine1 2012/07/02 21:56:28 (edited)
    steven
    BS! Same old crap you guys always spout, as if the only two choices are globalist puppets. No vote of conscience is wasted, even if it stands alone. DO SOME RESEARCH beyond sound bites on TV for once. Sorry if it hits too close to home, but I've had it with wimping out at voting. A true Constitutionalist is only 'unelectable' if people swallow the MSM BS.
  • relic steven 2012/07/02 22:01:23 (edited)
    relic
    Do your research. What he wrote is verifiable; Clinton was elected by votes for Perot.
  • Jim steven 2012/07/02 22:48:41
    Jim
    Open your eyes before it's too late. Every vote for someone other than Romney is a vote foe Obama. There is no two ways about it. The Dems and most Blacks will vote for Obama. They are praying you will vote for Ron Paul.
  • joseph ... Jim 2012/07/03 02:26:52
    joseph digristina
    We sure are, and we're gonna get our wish. Go Obama, go!
  • GOP Poison steven 2012/07/03 13:25:03
    GOP Poison
    I too was a Perot worker.I am reading some of the replies on here and it is exactly that sort of thinking that ensures we will always be governed by one of the two corrupt parties where most of Americans vote for the lesser of two evils.In our fight to get Perot elected we were overrun by republicans that were fed up with their party until the old"a vote for Perot is a vote for Clinton" got going and the republicans peeled off in droves. The democrats that were left that voted for Perot would NOT have voted for Bush if Perot were not in it.From my experience I can honestly tell you that Perot took votes from Clinton and not Bush.
    Just wanted to mention that Michelles statement was made the day he won the primary and NOT the day he won the general; election
  • joseph ... jasmine1 2012/07/03 02:25:52
    joseph digristina
    YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • steven relic 2012/07/02 21:55:19
    steven
    I did.
  • relic steven 2012/07/02 21:59:26 (edited)
    relic
    I made the mistake too. My vote helped put Clinton in office (he was the first president elected with less than 50% of the vote, wasn't he?). I won't make the same mistake this time.

    anyone but obama
  • joseph ... relic 2012/07/03 02:25:30
    joseph digristina
    Good . You helped give us Clinton twice. Thank you so much and thanks to the guy below who will give us Obama for another 4 years. I love third parties, they keep you Cons in check and out of power.
  • Richard 2012/07/02 19:42:22

News & Politics

2013/05/24 13:02:31

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals