States Consider Mileage Tax Via GPS: Should Drivers Be Taxed for Miles Driven?
Heisenberg
2012/07/19 22:44:30
|
|
|||||
|
44 votes
|
|
6% | |||
|
674 votes
|
|
94% | |||
OAKLAND (KCBS) – Bay Area drivers could one day be tracked using a GPS-like device in their cars and taxed per miles driven -- a scenario which is part of a proposed long-range study aimed at finding ways to reduce traffic and pollution, while also raising revenues. States consider mileage tax via GPS. Should drivers be taxed for miles driven?


Read More: http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/07/18/bay-ar...
Top Opinion
-
'Zedd 2012/07/19 22:47:56No






















Well well well, it seems the Obama administration will get what it want's, duplicative taxation on transportation to ensure the the US has the same fuel prices as Europe et al.
As I said in an earlier post, there aren't that many hybrid or all-electric vehicles on the road, yet, but more are coming. I think it would be a good idea to have the system for determining the fees they should pay for using the road in place sooner rather than later.
It's the same for owners of gas/diesel vehicles who get widely differing mpg performance from their vehicles: the driver of a car that gets 20mpg is going to pay twice as much in road development/maintenance fees at the pump as the owner of the vehicle that gets 40mpg. (Assuming vehicles of similar weight, of course)
If you keep track of how many miles are actually driven on the gov't maintained roads by GPS or some other reliable method, regardless of the fuel used, then fees can be assessed against the vehicle for miles actually driven on the road, which is the goal and purpose of road use/maintenance fees in the first place.
Keep the government out of our cars and our homes
If your answer is to just continue adding add'l layers of fees to the mass that we already have, that just continues compounding an already too complicated system of fees and charges. (Of course that will give those who complain that there are already too many fees tacked onto everything something to complain more about in the future.)
One fee structure, based on vehicle weight and miles driven, regardless of how much fuel was used or not used, that's all. And if you're all that concerned about the gov't "tracking" you while you're driving, get over it. There is already so much information about you available to the gov't, and the capability for them to gather more if "they" want it, this is a tempest in a teapot. If you have a cell phone made in the last four or five years in your purse or pocket, "they" can already track you, not your car, wherever you go.
It always amuses me that people within a decent amount of walking/biking distance in my local town, still drive to work. And then they complain about gas prices.
We should simply raise the tax on gas at the pump and increase the taxes on the other fossil fuels also.
The arguments were the same: equality because people only pay for what they drive, reduces pollution etc.
The reality that people saw were: those who rely on their cars for their livelihood penalised to the point of having to find another job, increased taxes for certain business reducing employment and competitiveness, a GPS that can tell the government where you are and above all the deep deep suspicion that this was just another way for the government to make more money.