SPECIAL MESSAGE TO GOP--RON PAUL 2012
morning40oz~mad as hell
2012/01/31 22:28:31
I am an individual.
I am not a color.
I am not a race.
I am not a religion.
I am an individual.
I am not a gender.
I am not an age.
I am not a sexuality.
I am an individual.
I am not a nationality.
I am not a region.
I am not a political party.
I am an individual.
There is one candidate.
Who doesn't see me.
As a group.
As a demographic.
Or as a voting bloc.
There is one candidate.
Who sees me.
As an individual.
And believes.
That I have the right.
To live my life.
However I want to live it.
Just as long.
As I never interfere
With anyone else's right.
To do the same.
There is one candidate.
Who believes that no government.
Has the authority.
To grant any individual.
Any rights.
They only have the authority.
(If we let them.)
To take away rights.
That we were already born with.
That one candidate.
Is Ron Paul.
And the fact that he believes in me.
Being able to make my own decisions.
About my life.
Well, that makes me believe in him.
I am not a drug addict.
I am not crazy.
I am not uneducated.
I am not uninformed.
And I do not blindly.
Or carelessly.
Support any candidate.
I know exactly why I support Ron Paul.
And I'd be willing to bet.
If you took the time to find out more.
About what Ron Paul really stands for.
You might support him too.
I am an individual.
And in the next election.
This individual.
Will stand for no one.
Other than Ron Paul.
Because Ron Paul.
Is the only candidate.
Who's ever stood up for me.
Written and edited by David Terry
Special Message to the GOP:
You cannot win without us and we will not vote for your hand picked candidate, especially after the way you've marginalized, insulted and disrespected us and Dr. Paul. Contrary to your attempt to convince people that we are a small "fringe" group, there are actually millions of us who are fed up with the lies, the manipulation and the blatant disregard for the constitution and our rights as individuals. We don't owe you or any other political party anything. So make your choice GOP leaders, it's Ron Paul or another four years of Obama. You KNOW you can't win without us, so, if you choose the latter, you've got no one but yourselves to blame.
If you want to make a statement, not only to the GOP, but our government, go to the link below and like or comment on the video. It's time to stop waiting for the government to make change for this country. It's time for this public to BE the change we so desperately need in this country--M40REVOLUTION
RESTORE AMERICA RON PAUL 2012
Read More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-BfPozMyKI
Top Opinion
-
ur XLNC 2012/02/01 02:35:13
I donate more money percentage wise than big money.
Are you going to tell me you're happy with the results of the EPA and FDA thus far? I know someone, personally, who died of E. Coli--a five year old little girl. With programs like this monitored at the state level, rather than the federal level, our environment and produce could be monitored more closely.
As for our borders, there has been not one candidate, in at least twenty years, who has been more of an advocate of border protection than Ron Paul. PLEASE don't take my word for it. Check it out for yourself.
Property rights SHOULD be way at the top of the list, though I don't believe that is his ultimate priority. Individual rights has been the priority I've seen him stress most of all. Again, I have been affected, personally, by the federal government, on the issue of property rights. In many situations I know of they buy your property at pennies on the dollar of its value and you are given no choice in the matter. That means that property ownership is a farce. You can check out this information as well.
Anyway, I understand the property rights but to an extent. For example, if you own a house do you get more rights than I do? If I own more property than you, do I get more of a say in government?
Instead of fixing the EPA, just get rid of it and let the industry monitor themselves? No thanks, I've seen how that works out.
I'll take a look at his Website to become better informed. But I don't like a guy who says he knew nothing about racist comments in a news letter he was in charge of. That leads me to believe he is either lying, so unorganized that he shouldn't be president, or is willing do anything for money. He believes you should have the right to refuse service to people of color because that is your right. Really?
Anyway, I'll try to get to his site and see what he says.
Individual rights isn't about race, class, religion, sex, or any other differences between us. However much you have or don't have is irrelevant. However, the current state of affairs is a system in which our differences are used against us by the media every day of our lives.
You think you've seen the industry monitor itself? That isn't correct. What you have seen is the corporate oligarchy, a monopoly of industrialists pay off the government to "monitor" our environment. That is NOTHING like the industry regulating itself because in the latter scenario it is US who does the regulating.
I'm glad you asked about the racist newsletters. Have you never been burned by someone you trusted in your lifetime? Those newsletters were written under his name by someone else at least twenty years ago and he has disavowed them and denied knowledge of them all this time. If there were any more to the story, it would have definitely come to light by now. On top of that, there has not been one single thing in any of the legislation written and voted on by Ron Paul that would indicate a man of racist character, whatsoever. I do believe his actions would have given him away as they do every other politician.
ADD--
I bel...
Individual rights isn't about race, class, religion, sex, or any other differences between us. However much you have or don't have is irrelevant. However, the current state of affairs is a system in which our differences are used against us by the media every day of our lives.
You think you've seen the industry monitor itself? That isn't correct. What you have seen is the corporate oligarchy, a monopoly of industrialists pay off the government to "monitor" our environment. That is NOTHING like the industry regulating itself because in the latter scenario it is US who does the regulating.
I'm glad you asked about the racist newsletters. Have you never been burned by someone you trusted in your lifetime? Those newsletters were written under his name by someone else at least twenty years ago and he has disavowed them and denied knowledge of them all this time. If there were any more to the story, it would have definitely come to light by now. On top of that, there has not been one single thing in any of the legislation written and voted on by Ron Paul that would indicate a man of racist character, whatsoever. I do believe his actions would have given him away as they do every other politician.
ADD--
I believe you will find his site interesting and look forward to seeing your take on it. As with every candidate or politician, I believe it is the voting record and legislation which tells the story most accurately.
Under a Paul presidency the departments of Energy, Education, Housing and Urban Development, Commerce and Interior would cease to exist. Their elimination would slice about $179 billion from the federal budget and cut about 134,000 federal jobs.
Paul said his plan would not lay people off, but would transfer them to other departments until they retire.
Paul would slash funding for the remaining departments, including a 40 percent cut for the Food and Drug Administration and a 30 percent budget reduction for the EPA. The Department of Defense would see $832 billion disappear from its budget during Paul’s first term in office, most of which would stem from Paul’s plan to end all foreign wars and foreign aid.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/p...
You're welecome
Your Ron Paul believes in an economic philosophy pushed by a women who spent her life advertising the evils of government funded health care but was more than happy to take advantage of it when she needed it. For the last twenty years he's put forth a bill to limit congressional terms. I wonder what his limit is, 30 years?
http://www.alternet.org/teapa...
Ron Paul on term limits.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Anyway, good luck trying to prove me wrong.
I also like your candor in answering that it could be both. That is a sign of an open mind and honesty. Good.
Yes, it's disgusting, but it's completely understandable. The human ego is a predictable animal.