Something Everyone Should Know About Paul Ryan & His "Forcible Rape Distinguishing" If They Care About The Female Gender, Period!
Todd Akin clarifies he's on the same page as Paul Ryan on 'forcible rape'

attribution: REUTERS
I just love thinking up ways to punish women who've been not-really-raped. Like all good Republicans do.
Whew. Great news, everyone. We no longer need to be upset that Rep. Todd
Akin, an actual member of the House and an actual Senate candidate,
said that women have magical lady parts to protect them from rape sperm
when they are victims of "legitimate rape." Because that's not what he
meant at all. As he explained on Mike Huckabee's radio show:
I was talking about forcible rape. I used the wrong word.
Ohhhh. Well, obviously talking about "legitimate rape" is totally out of
line. But talking about "forcible rape"? That just makes everything
better, doesn't it?
It also puts him in line with the rest of the Republican Party—including, of course, the party's vice presidential nominee, Rep. Paul Ryan:
Paul Ryan also co-sponsored HR 3,
the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion" bill in which Republicans tried
to redefine rape so that it only applied to "forcible" rape so those
fake rape victims would stop exploiting loopholes to cash in on fabulous
gifts and prizes. Republicans pulled that part out of the bill so
everyone would stop criticizing them, and then they tried to sneak it back in anyway.
The Romney campaign took the oh-so-bold step
on Sunday night of announcing that "Governor Romney and Congressman
Ryan disagree with Mr. Akin’s statement." This morning, after thinking
about it, Romney added that Akin's comments were "offensive":
“Congressman’s Akin comments on rape are insulting,
inexcusable, and, frankly, wrong,” Romney said. “Like millions of other
Americans, we found them to be offensive.” [...]“I have an entirely different view,” Romney said. “What he said is entirely without merit and he should correct it.”
But now Akin has explained that he holds the same position as Romney's
running mate: that there is a distinction between "forcible rape" and
not-really-rape.
So, Mitt, are you still offended? Do you still disagree? Still hold
an "entirely different view"? If so, sounds like you and your little
buddy need to sit down and have a long talk.
Top Opinion
-
Pat 2012/08/21 00:30:31The fact that Romney selected Ryan as a running mate fully knowing his stance...+12Any woman who votes Republican this year must have a screw loose somewhere. This legislative body of MEN is trying to tell WOMEN that basically, they have no control over their bodies particularly in the area of reproduction or violent assault/rape. No one is forcing any woman opposed to abortion to have an abortion. It you don't believe it's moral then don't do it. But, let me and other women make their own decision too. If women value their freedom to make their own decisions, they must vote Democrat in November.






















http://www.moveon.org/r?r=279...
And the really asinine thing is that it's only necessary to come up with a definition if you believe that it's okay to deny women control over their own bodies.
ETA: Although, the stickler in me can't refrain from pointing out that "forcible rape" is a pleonasm or a redundancy, not an oxymoron. Sorry.
As much as I'd love to blame Republicans for the the ridiculous term "forcible rape", it is a term used by the FBI.
These men were using a ridiculous fantasy about magic spermicide as the basis for an argument about the various "degrees" of rape.
Now they're steping all over themselves and each other in effort to explain what they "really" meant.
I've heard enough.
http://www.facebook.com/Chris...
P.S. Did you get that part of his statement where Akin said, "Rapists should get SOME punishment"?
That Mr. Akin says he shares the same beliefs as Ryan is like NAMBLA saying they side with Obama. Is it Obama's fault that some wackos say they endear his virtues?
The fact that Ryan co-sponsored that Bill doesn't make him a woman hater. What is his explanation? I read the "forcible rape" caveat as a way to increase the intensity of rape. Rape, by definition is forcible. So, although "forcible rape" is redundant, it also draws attention to it's seriousness. That is how I see it.