Yes, Michelle voluntarily gave up her licence to end an ethics investigation into
her behaviour.... 0bama gave up his law licence because he lied on his application to
take the bar exam...................
Neither can practice law..
Someone told me that both Barack and Michelle Obama were disbarred and I want to know if there is any proof of this. Thank you in advance.
Isma'ila (God has heard)!
2011/02/19 03:39:38
I just want to know. I asked that person and they copped an attitude because I would not accept their claims without proof. They need to know that it is not who I am to accept things without proof. Oh, and for the record, I cannot stand either of the Obamas. Thank you for listening.
Top Opinion
-
No nonsense NanC...don't BS... 2011/02/19 03:50:28
And the article you're too prejudiced and/or paranoid to read explains in great detail that Michelle wasn't disbarred, that she was never the subject of disciplinary action like some claim, and that she voluntarily inactivated her license in 1993 when she took a position as executive director for the Chicago office of Public Allies, after she'd been working a couple of years on the mayor's staff. She wasn't practicing law and so she didn't need to maintain the license. It would be fairly simple for her to reactivate it if she ever chose.
You could have saved a lot of borderline hysteria if you'd bothered to read the article that supports everything you maintain, only does so more thoroughly and with more complete background information.
http://obamatrueandfalse.com/...
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
her behaviour.... 0bama gave up his law licence because he lied on his application to
take the bar exam...................
Neither can practice law..
His was revoked
Both have Harvard Law degrees, and neither can practice law.
Probably got them through affirmative action and maybe the public dime.
already worked. Don't cry for me Argentina..... LOL
little pesty 0-bots are persistent in spreading obfuscations.
" I thought you were a christian."
" Goodluck, you have shown your true colors."
" I want friends that are loving and God-fearing, not hypocritical."
Four examples of judgement being passed. You can pick who you want for friends, but to judge them on having a different opinion is not right.
WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?
WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?
What Is the ARDC? (this is NOT the Illinois Bar-where one can voluntarily be inactive) As our name implies, the ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.
Our principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer's fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, we will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely).
We cannot impose fines, imprison, obtain monetary damages, enforce remedies between ...
WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?
What Is the ARDC? (this is NOT the Illinois Bar-where one can voluntarily be inactive) As our name implies, the ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.
Our principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer's fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, we will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely).
We cannot impose fines, imprison, obtain monetary damages, enforce remedies between the lawyer and client, or seek civil or criminal relief against a lawyer as part of the disciplinary process. We can affect only the lawyer's ability to practice law in Illinois.
We are not funded by taxpayers' money. We are funded entirely by the annual registration fees paid by attorneys authorized to practice law in Illinois.
http://obamatrueandfalse.com/...
Pathetic!~
Michelle Obama is on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS--order said since she has been placed INACTIVE that "no malpractice record required."
WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?
The article said:
"WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 -- AFTER only 4 YEARS -- HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?"
She was being investigated for malpractice..................
False! Michelle Obama was disbarred
Michelle Obama was licensed to practice law in 1989 by the State of Illinois Supreme Court. In 1993, she became voluntarily inactive.
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law – Last Registered Year: 1993
There were no disciplinary proceedings against her license of any kind:
Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings: None
In 1999, there was a procedural change not relevant to someone having already been voluntarily inactive since 1993:
CHANGING FROM RULE 770 INACTIVE STATUS
Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer’s preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law.
The current registration rules provide a procedure for lawyers on Court-ordered inactive status under former Supreme Court Rule 770 who might wish to register. Whatever registration status the lawyer wishes to assume (active, inactive, or retired), the lawyer must first file a motion with the Supreme Court for restoration to active status under Rule 759. ...
False! Michelle Obama was disbarred
Michelle Obama was licensed to practice law in 1989 by the State of Illinois Supreme Court. In 1993, she became voluntarily inactive.
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law – Last Registered Year: 1993
There were no disciplinary proceedings against her license of any kind:
Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings: None
In 1999, there was a procedural change not relevant to someone having already been voluntarily inactive since 1993:
CHANGING FROM RULE 770 INACTIVE STATUS
Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer’s preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law.
The current registration rules provide a procedure for lawyers on Court-ordered inactive status under former Supreme Court Rule 770 who might wish to register. Whatever registration status the lawyer wishes to assume (active, inactive, or retired), the lawyer must first file a motion with the Supreme Court for restoration to active status under Rule 759. The motion process is necessary to screen for those who transferred due to circumstances that require some review of present fitness, and the motions will be contested only in such cases. In all other cases, the ARDC will consent to the transfer, and when a consent is submitted, the Supreme Court typically allows the motion within a few weeks of when it is filed.