Some of Obama's biggest backers from 2008 leave him high and dry. Why do you think that is?
|
|
|||||
|
13 votes
|
|
68% | |||
|
6 votes
|
|
32% | |||
WASHINGTON –- In politics, as in life, no good deed goes unpunished. Just ask President Barack Obama.
Facing a tidal wave super PAC spending from the likes of GOP-backing billionaires
Sheldon Adelson and the Koch brothers, the Democratic president lacks
countervailing help from the super pack of well-heeled allies he drew in
2008 -– and rewarded with government jobs abroad.
Call them the Bundler-Ambassadors: wealthy individuals, most of them
with deep ties to the business community or corporate law, who gave
money of their own, and, more importantly, hit up wealthy friends for
“bundled” Obama cash.
In exchange, though no one exactly called it that, the president
nominated many of them for plum diplomatic assignments, in cities from
Paris, London and Berlin to Tokyo, Amsterdam and even Bratislava,
Slovakia.
There is no sign that the ambassadors are eager to come home and bundle
again. Indeed, a Huffington Post sampling on background via email
revealed that none were planning to return to bundle campaign
contributions for the president's reelection.
The Huffington Post compared the State Department diplomatic list with
information on 2008 contributions and found 28 individuals of
ambassadorial rank who had raised a total of more than $14 million for
the president. One of them, Kentucky entrepreneur Matthew Barzun,
quit his ambassadorial post in Sweden several months ago and is now the
Obama reelection’s finance director in Chicago. But, based on an
informal survey, his colleagues across the globe have no interest in
doing the same thing.

Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/19/obama-bun...
Top Opinion
-
TheTruth1313 2012/06/20 18:02:34They don't want to back a losing horse.+8I can only hope that it is because more and more people are waking up and realizing just what a pathetic joke of a failure the lying socialist Obama is.
More polls by Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru
- Billyk75 2012/06/20 21:03:20Because:They finally realized on what a lying icompetent he really is.reply
- cmdrbnd007 2012/06/20 20:51:04Because:The democrats have as many or more millionaires if they are not contributing to Obama's cause that means they no longer believe in it or him.reply
- bob 2012/06/20 20:07:21Because:The Wheels are comming off of barry's Corruption Bus.reply
- Seonag 2012/06/20 19:45:51They don't want to back a losing horse.+1or a liar!reply
- Gracie ~Gun Totin' Gracie~ 2012/06/20 19:29:36Because:+3They have come to the conclusion that he sucks!reply
- Reggie☮ 2012/06/20 18:42:43Because:+2He's a liar.reply
- Sue 2012/06/20 18:18:43Because:+3It was a bad investment.reply
- compufreek 2012/06/20 18:15:22Because:+3He really hasn't done anything he promised!!!reply
- TheTruth1313 2012/06/20 18:02:34They don't want to back a losing horse.+8I can only hope that it is because more and more people are waking up and realizing just what a pathetic joke of a failure the lying socialist Obama is.reply
- Heisenberg 2012/06/20 17:43:39Because:+4Most likely because they think he might lose and they want to be on the winning side.reply
- Vijay Pawar 2012/06/20 17:34:28Because:+2Because all those people have double crossed him.reply
- Dale Vijay P... 2012/06/20 18:44:15
+1Or has he double crossed the donors?reply - Vijay P... Dale 2012/06/20 19:02:20
May be 100% true or false! The game is the World in hands, so to meny enemies. Agree !reply - beach bum 2012/06/20 13:38:10Because:+3their choicereply
- MichaelJ 2012/06/20 13:28:14 (edited)They don't want to back a losing horse.+3I can't imagine. It can't be they because they were unsatisfied with the return on their investment. The so called 'green' energy companies got back 17 to 1 return in public money they contributed in the last election. I can only conclude they have decided that he can't win this one after being so transparent in his corrupt dealings.reply
- Dale 2012/06/20 13:23:53Because:+1These business people, rich business people if you wish, did not get to their status or maintain their status for being stupid. They are not going to get stung by the same bee twice.reply
-
Did you read the article? They did get positions of power. Ambassadors, etc....reply - Dale Assassi... 2012/06/20 14:48:33
+1Yes,I read the article. And I was making reference to their positions in society, not the fact they were awarded ambassadorships,etc.... I was trying to draw out the fact(s) these people are not stupid. Greedy..? Possibly, but stupid? No.reply



















