
Socialism: A GOP Plan Signed by Obama
Socialism: A GOP Plan Signed by Obama
Calling ObamaCare “socialized medicine” truly lowers the standards on what could be considered socialized medicine. It’s like calling paved roads “government overreach”; a stop light a “government takeover of your commute”; or a neighborhood with speed bumps “a road to communism.” The law is really some regulations to help consumers buy private insurance coupled with a small fee if consumers decide not to buy said insurance.
Is it perfect? No. Could it be improved? Absolutely. However, ObamaCare is the opposite of socialism, it’s a market solution.
The right-wing got a “free” market solution to health care. That was their cause – personal responsibility their mantra – now it’s law. They got an entire reform bill incentivising citizens to buy into private for-profit insurance plans. This is the Republican vision for America: Less government more profits for giant corporations. This core of the Affordable Care Act was an idea floated by President Nixon in 1974, touted by the Heritage Foundation in 1989, introduced by Newt Gingrich in 1993 and implemented by Mitt Romney in 2005. And now? Now it’s a big festering albatross around Obama’s neck.
As former presidential candidate Michele Bachmann said in front of the Supreme Court last week, "We have not waved the white flag of surrender on socialized medicine!”
So the decades-old Republican big idea finally gets Democratic presidential ink and now, if you ask a Republican, it’s an unconstitutional government takeover of health care Stalin would have loved. Mitt Romney wants to repeal ObamaCare and replace it with RomneyCare. Essentially repealing the Affordable Care Actwith the Affordable Care Act. Leave it to a Republican frontrunner to vow their first act as president will be to waste time with redundancies while lamenting how ineffective government can be.
Now health care reform has reached the Supreme Court, we will have a ruling on the law in late June. Will it be overturned fully or partially or upheld? It’s anyone’s guess.
Regardless of the outcome, personal responsibility in health care is a Republican pet idea they’ve strapped to the roof of the car.
It makes the case that their ideas should never be law because if partisanship beckons, they’ll rally against them and call any Democrats who signed the bill, Hitler.
Imagine if Obama signed the most recent Paul Ryan Budget plan – a blueprint to cut taxes further for the wealthy and further increase the debt by not taking in enough revenues. If Obama embraced it, Republicans would storm the Capitol calling it a tax hike and a Maoist plot with Wall Street. People in tri-corner hats with signs reading, “Don’t raise my taxes!” and “Stop government takeover of business!” would swarm The Mall. The erosion of Medicare would make Republicans faint on the House floor. “It’s a tenet of Marxism to kill grandma!” They’d gasp.
Just remember, when George W. Bush took office the budget was set to be balanced in a few short years. Social security was actually its namesake – secure. And then he went uber-GOP-with-a-mandate – didn’t pay for any of the wars he started – just showered seniors with unpaid-for Medicare Part D and sent everyone in the country a rebate check. And when this “free market capitalism” failed? He bailed out the banks and the auto industry with taxpayer money, famously saying he “abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.”
Now? Now the Republicans blame the deficit, the debt, the recession, the bailouts and (wait for it) the wars on the Democrat in the Oval Office.
It’s a take on the Pottery Barn rule, “You break it, you buy it.” The Republican version: “We break it, we blame you … and call you a Nazi.”
Read More: http://crooksandliars.com/tina-dupuy/socialism-gop...
Top Opinion
-
HL 2012/04/04 16:54:05I love facts!





















Mean? Why because I don't want to support the lazy azzes of those who can work but won't? Two words...screw you...and one more...Socialist!
NObama 2012!
who's with me....
oh, crap
Obama care is unconstitutional for one thing, the rest of it being a free market solution is a pant load. it will lead to a single payer system, single payer is not free market because there is no competition.
Libs preach "choice" as long as it's choice they agree with.
If the country wants to do this, then let the people decide by letting them choose between government care or insurance coverage from an company.
Choice is good right?
If Obamacare is great, then people will willing choose it right?
MAY YOUR MOTHER
If you wasn't so full of hate yourself maybe you would have gotten my point you RWNJ! The audacity of your kind to complain about anyones rhetoric when all you tout is hate about the left!
I've been critical of the individual mandate for the very reasons mentioned here, in that it's the conservative approach and because I think single-payer is the way for America to go. I also worry about the danger of merging private corporations (health insurers) so directly to government, because a) that's technically the definition of fascism, and 2) I understand 31 cents of every dollar spent on health care costs in the US right now goes to the for-profit industry: profits, stock options, executive salaries, advertising and other necessary costs of doing business. In raw numbers, that's almost 1/3 more people who could receive care without any additional cost being incurred if we simply eliminated the for-profit system altogether. Such a situation led Congressman Dennis Kucinich to remark that, "We're already paying for universal health care in this country, we're just not getting it.
All this said, I see why President Obama finally accepted this approach, and I think in hindsight he was very politically savvy to try and use such a solution to achieve what we all agree are solid, meaningful progressive planks of reform which will help millions of people who are currently struggling with health care costs, and millions more who presently hav...
I've been critical of the individual mandate for the very reasons mentioned here, in that it's the conservative approach and because I think single-payer is the way for America to go. I also worry about the danger of merging private corporations (health insurers) so directly to government, because a) that's technically the definition of fascism, and 2) I understand 31 cents of every dollar spent on health care costs in the US right now goes to the for-profit industry: profits, stock options, executive salaries, advertising and other necessary costs of doing business. In raw numbers, that's almost 1/3 more people who could receive care without any additional cost being incurred if we simply eliminated the for-profit system altogether. Such a situation led Congressman Dennis Kucinich to remark that, "We're already paying for universal health care in this country, we're just not getting it.
All this said, I see why President Obama finally accepted this approach, and I think in hindsight he was very politically savvy to try and use such a solution to achieve what we all agree are solid, meaningful progressive planks of reform which will help millions of people who are currently struggling with health care costs, and millions more who presently have no health care at all. The PPACA may also be a huge step in the direction of the type of single-payer system folks like me want (although, again, this mandate irks me) - time will tell. I just cannot believe that conservatives turned and cried socialism on Obama when it was their own people who invented, peddled, supported and implemented this very model, for more than two decades. They are the ones who were for it before they were against it.
Your favorite and probably main source of information Faux No News viewers were the least informed. So I may give you a pass because you don't even know you don't know and I'm advising you to