So you’re in favor of A smaller government?
Obama Failed Soda Head Chief Opi
2012/08/01 02:46:21
Notice to lid/prod if your not going to defend your Big Government option then vote your big government option and move on
Read More: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4...
Top Opinion
-
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/08/01 02:50:24Yes, i am in favor of smaller government: Comment as you wish






















But here's why I chose big government.
If you were to be born randomly in the world and you had a choice between a place with a big government and relatively high taxes or a place with small government and low or no taxes you'd be wise to pick the former. If you pick the latter, have fun starving or dying of malaria in a sub-saharan African or central American banana republic because that's most likely where you'll end up. Our government such as it is gives everyone a much better chance to succeed and reach their potential. Enjoy life liberty, pursuit of happiness and so on. Like conservatives ironically say, "Freedom ain't free."
Everybody says they want "smaller government" but few people really know what that means. If, for example we made child prostitution legal, that would be less government. I don't think anyone here is pro-child porn. The truth is it's n...
But here's why I chose big government.
If you were to be born randomly in the world and you had a choice between a place with a big government and relatively high taxes or a place with small government and low or no taxes you'd be wise to pick the former. If you pick the latter, have fun starving or dying of malaria in a sub-saharan African or central American banana republic because that's most likely where you'll end up. Our government such as it is gives everyone a much better chance to succeed and reach their potential. Enjoy life liberty, pursuit of happiness and so on. Like conservatives ironically say, "Freedom ain't free."
Everybody says they want "smaller government" but few people really know what that means. If, for example we made child prostitution legal, that would be less government. I don't think anyone here is pro-child porn. The truth is it's not about "big" or "small" If you want small government there are plenty of places you can go. it's about smarter and better government --a government that works for the people not just for a few people with the deepest pockets.. a society in which everyone has the best chance to succeed and safely follow their dreams.
My view as a right winger" i Prefer smaller government, less regulation, most services to be provided by the private sector in a free market, and a literal interpretation of the Constitution.Government should tax less, spend less. Tax rate should not be higher for high-income earners.Cut taxes more on businesses to increase revenue, which builds economy support the right to bear arms, death penalty, and personal responsibility as an individual
Congress has the duty to tax and spend. It's in the enumerated powers. If you don't like it you can't say you're for the constitution. And if you make more income then you have benefited more from this society than someone who's made less -therefor you owe more back. It's called a progressive tax system --it's been around since ancient Greece and it works. Giving back creates more opportunities for the next people to come along and innovate and make more money. More people have a better life, can create more, buy more goods and services which trickles up and in the long run makes life better for the rich who had to pay a little more. I hope some day I have that "problem." I sure won't be whining about it like a little bitch.
When you have a more progressive tax system in encourages the wealthy to invest in more business creating more jobs. When you cut their taxes it encourages them to put more in their Swis...
Congress has the duty to tax and spend. It's in the enumerated powers. If you don't like it you can't say you're for the constitution. And if you make more income then you have benefited more from this society than someone who's made less -therefor you owe more back. It's called a progressive tax system --it's been around since ancient Greece and it works. Giving back creates more opportunities for the next people to come along and innovate and make more money. More people have a better life, can create more, buy more goods and services which trickles up and in the long run makes life better for the rich who had to pay a little more. I hope some day I have that "problem." I sure won't be whining about it like a little bitch.
When you have a more progressive tax system in encourages the wealthy to invest in more business creating more jobs. When you cut their taxes it encourages them to put more in their Swiss bank accounts so the money just sits there and piles up creating no economic activity. If you don't believe me check the job growth under Clinton vs Bush. It's pretty obvious one plan worked and the other didn't.
When was the last time you heard Obama or any Democratic politician promote any law to "take away your right to bear arms?" I think it may have gone too far though, the NRA won't be happy until any nut-job can buy a machine gun at 7-11 with a grenade launcher attachment. The 2nd Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." You wanna tell me what bubba carrying an assault rifle into a movie theater or bar has to do with a "well regulated militia?" be my guest. To use the 2nd Amendment as a reason for no gun regulation is ridiculous. The words "Well Regulated" are right in the amendment! See what I mean about "selective reading?"
Side note: I do not have a family income over 250K and I do not want a damn thing from the GOV.
Anyway, let's take away all the wealth from everyone and make everyone in the USA equal. Same car, same house, same amount of money in the bank.
The bottom line is that in 5 years some people will be better off and some people will be broke.
The lesson is:
The GOV can never regulate things like people's motivation to succeed and the wise / poor decisions that some people make.
Even in Socialist societies their is disparity.
People need to start taking accountability for their own actions and stop making it sound like if they are not successful it is someone else's fault.
I guess that is hard though when, if you think this way, the guy you voted for keeps doing it.
The largest transfer of payments (welfare) goes to Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP), Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), housing vouchers, State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).
Medicaid spent the most on health care in 2011 - $228 billion for 49 million Americans. Food stamps or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was the second largest expenditure in 2011 with $72 billion for 41 million Americans. This year, 43 million Americans are on food stamps thanks to our tanking economy under the leadership and guidance of the current administration. According to Michael Tanner, Director of Health and Welfare Studies at the Cato Institute, federal spending on welfare rose 375 percent since 1965. Total federal welfare spending rose from 2.19 to 6 percent of GDP.
http://www.canadafreepress.co...
One reason for the rise in welfare is the rise in income inequality. The middle class workers have had there income level off in the last 32 years, while the wealthy income has gone up almost 300%. But I agree the recession has caused a lot of this rise in welfare, Where I differ with you that this recession can't all be laid at the feet of Obama. Economist said this was in the making for along time. I know this is sacrilegious to bring up W's part of this with the right wing, but it did happen before Obama came into office. So blame them both!!!!
http://www.ponderstorm.com/20...
More than a month ago I asked if Barack Obama’s “Robin Hood” tax plan would redistribute wealth. Based on the fact that only about 65% of Americans pay any income taxes but Obama was promising a “tax cut” to 95% of Americans I knew something was fishy. Because those numbers are mathematically impossible to compute I suspected he was calling an income redistribution scheme a “tax cut.”
My fear that such a scheme could be in the works went from speculation to reality when Obama answered a simple question from a business owner about taxes. We now have proof positive that Obama plans to take from the haves and give to the have nots. Watch Obama in his own words tell that he plans to “spread the wealth around” (about 4:45 into the video):
So in the end what are the reasons for a smaller government? A smaller government puts more money in your pocket and lets you keep the money you earn, a smaller government lets you keep your privacy and keeps the government out of your life, a smaller government makes those in government work harder and a smaller government is in line with the very ideas of our founding fathers. The sole purpose of government should be to protect my inalienable freedoms listed in the Bill of Rights, not put limits on them like big government does. A smaller government leads to a more efficient government. A smaller government leads to a more free nation. We, as a nation, should be more personally responsible and accountable and with a gigantic government that is impossible. Big government is robbing you blind. I want the government out of my bedroom, out of my wallet and out of my life. One thing we must remember is that a government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.
Without a strong military nothing else will matter.