So, You Think Socialism Isn’t Really that Bad?
Is socialism really so bad? That was a question from my hairdresser, when I told her after last election that Obama would change the USA and we would slowly become a socialist republic.
And I said “YES“, because I know – I grew up in a socialist country, the former Czechoslovakia. After the government nationalizes everything, there is no private business left. You work for the government, your children go to government schools, you shop in government stores (you hardly find there what you need – shortages of everything all the time). You can only visit a doctor allocated to you, and the government controls where you travel (you’re not allowed to leave the country without a special permit). And you listen only to radio stations owned by the government and see only TV programs approved by the government.
Some people here just don’t get it and think that this cannot happen here. The first communist president in former Czechoslovakia, where I grew up, was elected in a free election. He promised to “spread the wealth by taking it from the rich and giving it to the poor”. Soon after that, everybody was poor; only the politician were rich (they had access to specials stores where they could get everything they wanted).
Read More: http://clashdaily.com/2012/09/so-you-think-sociali...






















"Capitalism and Freedom"
The government itself, once again!, was the problem more than the dream of an egalitarian society, called by the name socialism.
What is being passed off here as socialism was in fact a totalitarian dictatorship.
Humans are bilateral. Socialism is good where the community is involved.
Capitalism & Libertarianism is good where the individual is involved, the best of these systems can be combined for the greater good.
expanding economies, and the five strongest nations. Give that some thought and post
your opinions here, naming those who have strong central governments in CAPITALS, and all others in small case. Then let's have a converfsation. Deal?
I can only surmise by what you actually write, if you
mean something other than what your words convey, it is confusing....
I misunderstood what you meant by nothing in life is free, then. :)
It helps if a term is defined before the discussion gets started... Socialism for example .
When the US government hands out payments it is considered socialism? unless the handouts are for example.to Wall Street or billions of dollars annually in the US federal agricultural subsidy program to multimillionaires for Not growing anything on their vast land holdings. i.e. for being rich landowners who do nothing.
Mom and pop farms struggling to stay in business would be much better recipients, IMO.
Can the US continue such largesse to a small financial elite that will certainly not starve if the government stops handing them annual checks for 25 million dollars for slacking?
My point is taxpayer's money is going to rich people who manage to get a surprising amount for free, tax shelters and tax write offs and all sorts of clever tricks.
I live in the Netherlands that has a mandatory national healthcare insurance plan, for example, socialist?
Civilized, is the word that comes to mind.
Getting back on track, what is your definition of socialism, please?
Democracy in ancient Greece meant something a quite a bit different than what people today fondly imagine it to be.
1) Took the dollar off the gold standard, in effect making the dollar increasingly worthless over time
2) has been at war for How many years now and
3) Wall Street got a megabillion bail out from....... taxpayers!
have in your mind less effect on the economy than Obama?
'Kay
for Wall Street's shenaningans, and with taxpayer's money.
How long has the US been in armed conflict in the Middle East?
War costs money, a lot of money.
Dollar isn't on the gold standard anymore,
which Republican is responsible for that brilliant move?
If you're referring to FDR:
On June 5, 1933, the United States went off the gold standard, a monetary system in which currency is backed by gold, when Congress enacted a joint resolution nullifying the right of creditors to demand payment in gold.
http://www.history.com/this-d...
FDR is an honorary to the libbies:
http://fdrdemocrat.org/
(Nixon was a Republican, I just assumed you would know. He did it during the weekend and a Congressional recess, for some reason)
Forty Years Ago Today Nixon Took Us Off the Gold Standard | Fox ...
www.foxnews.com/.../forty-yea...
15 Aug 2011 – Today we celebrate, or, actually, mourn the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon's taking America, and the world, off the gold standard, ...
Nixon Shock
The Nixon Shock was a series of economic measures taken by U.S. President Richard Nixon in 1971 including unilaterally cancelling the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold that essentially ended the existing Bretton Woods system of international financial exchange.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
at least not from the conservative point of view
and yet it was done by a Republican prez,
Richard Watergate Nixon, none other than.
Fact. Ask yr Sodahead republican friends that know more.
Talking about the inadvisability of going off the gold standard
in no way equates with blaming the 'pubs for everything,
Coming up with that bit of Right wing self-bashing shows talent,
if only there were an Olympic Event for Jumping to the Wrong conclusion you'd be a contender for the gold.
There's that word again, LOL
But whatever floats your boat.
Thank you for your answer, it didn't disappoint.
I could not believe the hundreds of signs I saw at the DNC Charlotte convention. FORWARD/NOT BACK. How about Michelle Obama asking all to keep on sacrificing for our own kids and grandkids (while she enjoys luxury vacations traveling in the large private jet paid for by us taxpayers)?
http://clashdaily.com/2012/09...