So now...
The Black Dagger
2012/03/28 02:05:39
|
|
|||||
|
2 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
57% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
36% | |||
...that we have learned that Zimmerman was a registered democrat, what do you think will happen now?
Top Opinion
-
Alex 2012/03/28 02:18:08All of the above.
Okay...so let me here the expansion of whatever you seem to be arguing here. A one sentence post doesn't an argument make. Maybe I'll be convinced if you expand on your point.
They took an end run around the judicial system and already tried, convicted and had planned punishment for Zimmerman. True to form Conservatives came to his aid because people were trying to circumvent proper judicial procedure with outrageous and absolutely unfounded assertions of racism. So immeadiately, the various race baiting groups, like NAACP, NBP, etc, painted him as a Conservative Republican simply because those that defended his Constitutional rights were Conservatives.
On the other side of the spectrum, Liberals began looking into their infallible crystal balls of mind reading and they knew that his motivation was racial. Further, the boy that was killed was an innocent, poor, helpless, little lamb, and not a 6'2" 17 year old thug wannabe. They knew Zimmerman was a white man because his last name was Zimmerman and when it was discovered he was only half white, he became suddenly a White-Hispanic (a term I have never heard in my entire life; and I grew up in Texas).
The Liberals didn't look at the facts. They looked only at the race and their presumptions based on absolutely nothing more ...
They took an end run around the judicial system and already tried, convicted and had planned punishment for Zimmerman. True to form Conservatives came to his aid because people were trying to circumvent proper judicial procedure with outrageous and absolutely unfounded assertions of racism. So immeadiately, the various race baiting groups, like NAACP, NBP, etc, painted him as a Conservative Republican simply because those that defended his Constitutional rights were Conservatives.
On the other side of the spectrum, Liberals began looking into their infallible crystal balls of mind reading and they knew that his motivation was racial. Further, the boy that was killed was an innocent, poor, helpless, little lamb, and not a 6'2" 17 year old thug wannabe. They knew Zimmerman was a white man because his last name was Zimmerman and when it was discovered he was only half white, he became suddenly a White-Hispanic (a term I have never heard in my entire life; and I grew up in Texas).
The Liberals didn't look at the facts. They looked only at the race and their presumptions based on absolutely nothing more than skin color and the media followed suit to sell papers. Then it comes to light that this horrible white monster is one of their own, and this has happened many times before and you and they bought into it.
Now, the media, staying true to form, will have to find a way to spin this to continue to make Zimmerman the bad guy and not a true Democrat or they will ignore the fact that he is a Democrat altogether.
As for the blame Bush crowd....The "stand your ground" law enacted by Jeb Bush, and written by the gun lobby has made this case a bit of a mess. Reasonable force to defend oneself was a perfect standard before. We should take some time to review our gun laws and stop the NRA from framing the argument under a guise of "freedom."
But I'll reserve judgment until more real facts come out....democrats that commit crimes should be punished just the same as everyone else.
However, 17 year olds of any race should not be shot, while walking home with skittles and an iced tea. This is a tragedy.
Your whole second paragraph is once again, absolutely full of presumptions. The NRA wrote the law? The NRA framed the argument? You've got to be joking, it's in the Constitution. It was an attempt to get rid of murky language such as "reasonable". Why don't you actually look up how easy it is to go to jail for defending yourself even without the use of a gun or even without anyone being killed.
In your third paragraph, you said you'll reserve judgement until the facts come out, however, in your first paragraph you've already painted him as stalking Trayvon with "gun in hand" when there has been nothing evidential released that says he was stalking the boy while brandishing a gun. So the boy was walking home and was just shot for no reason, oh wait, I thought you were reserving your judgements.
How many Psuedo-Conservatives will abandon their principals in favor of party and no longer defend Zimmerman's rights?
You consider this stupid only because that connection can't be made.
If you wanna debate guns and politics outside of this case...create the poll and we'll go...till then don't assume what I think, know or consider to be stupid...as that would go to my state of mind.
When will this idiocy end?
You miss the point of my statement...
Typical Conservative.
Again, typical Liberal.
But since you want to play, let's go through your statement, you know, your first statement. Not the one where you are pretending to be an independent.
Right Wingers, as you so Liberally put it, have actually done the exact opposite. They have simply been trying to show Liberals that he isn't a racist psycho or something along those lines. It is the Liberals who have been intimating and trying so desperately to paint him as a "typical racist Conservative white person who wants to kill black kids".
I am merely showing these same individuals that he is not in fact a Republican but a Democrat and asserting that all of the hype that the Liberals and the Media have paid into this will now have to be spun, as has been done several times prior.
Also, what if he were a Republican? My guess is we'd be reading several dozen Sodahead postings grave dancing and shouting from the rooftops "All Conservatives "are racist psychos".
Indeed. When will the idiocy end?
"Both sides" is a complete cop out when a Liberal is caught within the web of his own hypocrisy.
You changed your entire point of view. I'm so happy that people like you are so much above all the rest of us pleebs. I hope you don't get a nosebleed up there in that tall ivory tower.
Furthermore you haven't made a point about anything other than trying to prove your belief that you are better than everyone else.
Walks and talks like a duck, guess what?
If I argue your views it makes me a Liberal...
Your logic is awesome.
Instead of logically countering all of my statements with thought out replies, proving me wrong, you attack me personally, proving me right.
Edit: And thanks, my logic is awesome and you are not the first to have said so.
You don't have anything important that is worth countering.
And again, instead of logically picking apart my logic or observations you instead implied that my world view was skewed, which is essentially a personal attack.
I've given you plenty of opportunities to logically rebuff my argument, but instead you go the "typical Liberal" route and merely strengthen it even further.
You simply say I have nothing important to say without any proof to that on your part. You simply say that your assertions are correct without any further clarification. Your arguments and points are nearly non-existent and easily crushed, ie; this particular discussion we are having now.
It is essentially one sided with me making points and you venting frustration at your lack of counter points. I am merely pointing out this to you and it is ironically frustrating you even further.
Nice speech...
You still don't have anything that is worth arguing, seriously, about.
Typical Liberal.
Nothing to argue about.
I was trying to allow you the chance to regain a little dignity, but instead, you chose simply to not do anything.
So be it.