Should Women Be allowed to go topless in public?

Absolutely, but I would rather they didn't excersize that right. lol

No, there better be a baby breastfeeding to explain for it.

Are breasts "sexual objects?" Obviously no, if a baby needs to feed. (As a pro-lifer, I am for having "unlimited" natural babies, but then, babies need to often be fed.) But if no hungry baby, apparently in the West, breasts are considered "sexual."

Ever since Adam and Eve committed Original Sin, we've had to wear clothes. Seems we think too much about sex and lust now.

Your religion has nothing to do with law.

Oh really? Well then who are you to impose your false religion upon me, in its influence in man's corrupt "laws?"

Thou shalt not kill. Too religious? So now it's okay to murder? Okay for me to steal your stuff? Wouldn't want to be "too religious," now would we?

The very 3 branches of our government, come straight out of Isaiah, I don't recall the exact verse at the moment, but where it says that God is our lawgiver, our judge, our king.

Anesthesia was invented, by a guy believing it was possible to do surgery without the pain, because it says in Genesis, that God put Adam into a deep sleep, when God removed his rib and made Eve.

So if you think religion has nothing to do with government, then move out of America, and don't partake of modern medical science.

And if you don't like my reasons for accepting breastfeeding in public, then why don't you take up the argument with the radical femi-nazis, who also seem to think they have that right, although I think they could be a bit less "in your face" about it.

Actually, before the "savior" arrived, we still considered those things illegal except in times of war.

Cool off! freedom first! Always. rev. C. Pierce

Kindof sortof does. But the law states that nudity, in and of itself. Is not illegal! Case law.

Read the book again. The fist thing they did when they became capable of sin was put on clothes. Then God saw that and got angry at them for it.

Some girls are insucure or have self respect for their bodies

Yeah, that's right. And I usually tip them at the local strip clubs. Face it. Housewives who are that and nothing more. Are live-in whores. A partner supports them. Albeit, mothers can be the most ruthless adult one could ever encounter as a child. And competition among the click in high schools. Plays out on the course of adult life. These respectible women cheat by holding their kids back a year in kindergarden. Just to get the advantage. A left-over from school. Those who bullied early in life. Will do so until death. They will become a cop or other gonernment job. Get into yet another click.

While some women have good looking boobs ,how many have them hanging to their bellybuttons.

Who acres. They are legal

At least, as much as men are allowed to. If women were out topless that often, it would not be a big deal very quickly. The problem is that we are raised to be so Conservative and Puritanistic that the thought of bare breasts is equal to bare genitalia. It's not the same thing, and never has been. Of course, just like with men, it should definitely be a choice, and some establishments can still have the "no shirt, no shoes, no service" policies.

ummm no cuz thats nor right an its just unordinary

AND YOU ARE A NAZI TOO< RIGHT?

umm excuse me??

The main problem is when the first Defense Lawyer uses "My rapist Client" couldn't help himself", it's like a drunk being taken to a bar by his friends and falls off the wagon, he'll blame his friends not himself.

Hell yea :)... But I also believe they should be allowed to go bottomless so pay no attention to me

i havent heard about it in ohio. for real?? i would never do it i would be too embarassed.

It is " not " in Ohio . I live there .

I did. See above .

You " did " what ?

Did it in Marblehead on the Main Street w/o incident.

No...and pants should not be hanging off a guys ass either

If guys can do it. There's no difference both are boobies XD they must be set free!!

Is that true? Topless in New York?

I'm glad I live where the original York is.

That sounds like a film JK..sleepless in seattle and the sequel..topless in New york :)

Yes it does Debs,

But not a film I would pay to see, not that I am offended by these bits, but there is a time and a place :)

Lovely to see you my friend :)...I went into town this morning..its hot..and I saw some sights that are best left covered !!

Debs,

I'm not sure how to answer that, because I don't know where you were looking :)

I wasnt looking and thats why I have a bump on my head, but thats a different story :))..and I will leave it up to your imagination regarding the summery sights..:)

i say... why not... if fat guys with man boobs can go without shirts, then women should too

No. Some things are best left covered up.

the thing is, if they just do it, it gets normal

Yes, breasts are sexual, just like legs.
I think if it's a church or a government building or something than no but just in public there shouldn't be a problem.

Absolutely!

America has gone off the deep end with trying to control women, and sexual things... while they ignore violence completely... it is OK to show on live tv, someone gorging on blood, guts, gore, and veins in their teeth, while they find a tv station 1million for accidentally allowing a .5 second glimpse of a nipple to be broadcast.

As long as the horses keep blinkered as some of the sights might just make them bolt.....

Why not? The reason women's breasts have a sexual association is BECAUSE they are covered up.

Ah, the voice of reason, you are absolutely right.

Thanks blindfaith.