Should We Suspend Aid to Countries That Attack U.S. Embassies?
Chris D
2012/09/13 18:21:21
|
|
|||||
|
700 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
71 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
84 votes
|
|
10% | |||
The U.S. helps save the Egyptian people from the tyrant Mubarak -- and then radicals attack our embassy. We help Libya free themselves of the horrific Muammar Gaddafi, and they storm our embassy and murder our diplomats. Should the US suspend aid to the countries that commit these crimes?
FOXNEWS.COM reports:

FOXNEWS.COM reports:
Lawmakers and other officials stepped up calls Thursday for the United States to put heavy pressure on the governments whose people are storming U.S. diplomatic posts across the Middle East and North Africa -- even if it means freezing aid and expelling diplomats from Washington.

Read More: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/13/lawmake...
Top Opinion
-
Tuna 2012/09/13 19:33:13Yes





















see OUR retribution.
If we have now decided to help the better ones (and the poor ones independent of side) and get than an attack from the bad ones, why should we stop the support for the good and poor ones? Because the good ones have a problem to defeat this attackers (because of politically split army or police forces for example)?
If you are lacking detailed information or overview it's better to shut up before you make it more worst: There are more than enough killers inside the US, and nobody can stop them before they have outed themselves by killing someone. Just because you do not know when and why or who. And when there are dead people its too late...
And: Yes, killing of their own Presidents has not encouraged the Americans to ban firearms...
No, one of their biggest industries is export of weapons to ..... exactly.