Should we make a law that says you can only own two guns?
Ron
2012/07/02 21:27:04
|
|
|||||
|
8 votes
|
|
17% | |||
|
40 votes
|
|
83% | |||
Guns. They are something in today’s world we unfortunately need. But you
have to remember that when we allow ourselves to have guns we have to
do it right or else we have chaos. It’s ether gun control or no control.
For we cannot control the criminal when we allow them to get a gun and
then they go ahead and use it. They, the criminal become something that
they would not normally be when they possess a gun .They become
possessed by an evilness that makes them do things that no other weapon
can match. The criminal would not conduct him or herself in the same way
if the criminal had to use a knife, bat or another weapon. Only a gun
gives the criminal a great advantage over there victims. Against a
knife, bat or other weapon we would feel we might have a chance to
defend ourselves. But a gun is a whole different story. So I hope for
the good of us all and to make the job of our police officers a lot
easier lets get some control over the guns.
Guns. Some will say you can’t live with them and some say you can’t live
without them. However you look at it we are stuck with them. What
counts the most is what to do with them and how to keep them out of the
hands of those that shouldn’t possess them. Now as much as we are all
in agreement that we have to have laws in order to keep the guns out of
the hands of those that shouldn’t have them isn’t it better to enact
policy and laws that would make it harder for criminals to get the guns
in the first place. In other words lets dry up the gun market place that
GIVES the criminal the opportunity to purchase a gun in the first
place. How do you do that? EASILY! All we have to do is enact laws that
says you are allowed to have a gun but you are only allowed to have two
of them. Hunters and gun collectors could have something worked out for
their needs All gun sales from this moment on will be registered with
the government so that we can get a HANDLE ON THE EASILY EXCESSIVE
ABILITY of the criminal gun market. Now I know that all you gun freaks
are flipping out about registering your FUTURE gun purchases but you got
to admit we do have a problem and we got to do something about it . The
criminals can get guns too easily because any non-criminal can purchase
as MANY GUNS AS THEY WANT AND SELL THEM TO THE CRIMINALS!!!!! DO YOU
HEAR WE HAVE TO STOP THAT!!!! By having laws that says you can only
have two guns all those that want to sell guns to those that shouldn’t
have them will only have two guns to sell. After that they’re out of
business. Then we enact laws that ALL gun sales must be registered with
the government. Violators with criminal intent would be dealt with
seriously with 5-10 years in jail. Take the initiative out of selling
guns and the criminals will have a harder time purchasing guns in the
underground gun market place. Then we will get to the day when many
criminals won’t have guns and I’m sure they’ll be a lot less vicious and
destructive and evil and easier to deal with. Most of all we’ll take
away the one thing that makes them be the worst they can be. Then we’ll
have a better world, a safer world, a peaceful world.
America has problems that beg for solutions. Has Mr. Romney
shown any solutions to our problems? Romney and the Republicans will
pander to the NRA and allow people to buy as many guns as they want. Mr.
Romney and the Republicans will even allow guns that are able to fire
many many bullets without reloading to be sold, semi- automatic guns. Many people who can buy
guns will buy many guns and then sell them to people who aren’t allowed
to buy guns, namely the criminals. By allowing people to buy as many
guns as they want and by allowing most any kind of gun to be sold Mr.
Romney, the NRA and the Republicans are assisting the criminals to
create crimes. By voting for the Republicans YOU are assisting the
criminals to kill and harm the POLICE and citizens of America! So the
next time you vote ask yourself if you want to vote for someone who
blocks laws that will keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Now I
know a lot of you are wondering how are we going to pass laws that will
keep laws out of the hands of criminals but allow law abiding citizens
to buy guns. Well that is easy to devise such a law. I have been trying
for a long time to get this law passed. The law simply says that we can
buy guns but all we are allowed to buy are two guns. Certified hunters
and rural farmers/ranchers can buy a couple more. But that is all the
guns we can buy. Doing this will eventually dry up the market place for
illegal guns which will make it hard for criminals to get guns. I’m sure
that you and the police will appreciate it it if criminals couldn’t get
guns. And when you think about it the way things stand right now we are
assisting criminals to be a worse person then they normally would be.
By allowing criminals to get guns we are making criminals do things that
they wouldn’t do if they didn’t have a gun. Most criminals who use guns
to commit crimes wouldn’t commit that crime if they had to use a knife
or a bat or something else besides a gun. And wouldn’t you feel better
if you had to face a criminal who has a knife or bat or something else
besides a gun. It would be a safer and better world world if we do
something to get the guns out of the hands of criminals. Here’s the
plan. NOW DO IT! Read www.mybetteramericaplan.com for more information
have to remember that when we allow ourselves to have guns we have to
do it right or else we have chaos. It’s ether gun control or no control.
For we cannot control the criminal when we allow them to get a gun and
then they go ahead and use it. They, the criminal become something that
they would not normally be when they possess a gun .They become
possessed by an evilness that makes them do things that no other weapon
can match. The criminal would not conduct him or herself in the same way
if the criminal had to use a knife, bat or another weapon. Only a gun
gives the criminal a great advantage over there victims. Against a
knife, bat or other weapon we would feel we might have a chance to
defend ourselves. But a gun is a whole different story. So I hope for
the good of us all and to make the job of our police officers a lot
easier lets get some control over the guns.
Guns. Some will say you can’t live with them and some say you can’t live
without them. However you look at it we are stuck with them. What
counts the most is what to do with them and how to keep them out of the
hands of those that shouldn’t possess them. Now as much as we are all
in agreement that we have to have laws in order to keep the guns out of
the hands of those that shouldn’t have them isn’t it better to enact
policy and laws that would make it harder for criminals to get the guns
in the first place. In other words lets dry up the gun market place that
GIVES the criminal the opportunity to purchase a gun in the first
place. How do you do that? EASILY! All we have to do is enact laws that
says you are allowed to have a gun but you are only allowed to have two
of them. Hunters and gun collectors could have something worked out for
their needs All gun sales from this moment on will be registered with
the government so that we can get a HANDLE ON THE EASILY EXCESSIVE
ABILITY of the criminal gun market. Now I know that all you gun freaks
are flipping out about registering your FUTURE gun purchases but you got
to admit we do have a problem and we got to do something about it . The
criminals can get guns too easily because any non-criminal can purchase
as MANY GUNS AS THEY WANT AND SELL THEM TO THE CRIMINALS!!!!! DO YOU
HEAR WE HAVE TO STOP THAT!!!! By having laws that says you can only
have two guns all those that want to sell guns to those that shouldn’t
have them will only have two guns to sell. After that they’re out of
business. Then we enact laws that ALL gun sales must be registered with
the government. Violators with criminal intent would be dealt with
seriously with 5-10 years in jail. Take the initiative out of selling
guns and the criminals will have a harder time purchasing guns in the
underground gun market place. Then we will get to the day when many
criminals won’t have guns and I’m sure they’ll be a lot less vicious and
destructive and evil and easier to deal with. Most of all we’ll take
away the one thing that makes them be the worst they can be. Then we’ll
have a better world, a safer world, a peaceful world.
America has problems that beg for solutions. Has Mr. Romney
shown any solutions to our problems? Romney and the Republicans will
pander to the NRA and allow people to buy as many guns as they want. Mr.
Romney and the Republicans will even allow guns that are able to fire
many many bullets without reloading to be sold, semi- automatic guns. Many people who can buy
guns will buy many guns and then sell them to people who aren’t allowed
to buy guns, namely the criminals. By allowing people to buy as many
guns as they want and by allowing most any kind of gun to be sold Mr.
Romney, the NRA and the Republicans are assisting the criminals to
create crimes. By voting for the Republicans YOU are assisting the
criminals to kill and harm the POLICE and citizens of America! So the
next time you vote ask yourself if you want to vote for someone who
blocks laws that will keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Now I
know a lot of you are wondering how are we going to pass laws that will
keep laws out of the hands of criminals but allow law abiding citizens
to buy guns. Well that is easy to devise such a law. I have been trying
for a long time to get this law passed. The law simply says that we can
buy guns but all we are allowed to buy are two guns. Certified hunters
and rural farmers/ranchers can buy a couple more. But that is all the
guns we can buy. Doing this will eventually dry up the market place for
illegal guns which will make it hard for criminals to get guns. I’m sure
that you and the police will appreciate it it if criminals couldn’t get
guns. And when you think about it the way things stand right now we are
assisting criminals to be a worse person then they normally would be.
By allowing criminals to get guns we are making criminals do things that
they wouldn’t do if they didn’t have a gun. Most criminals who use guns
to commit crimes wouldn’t commit that crime if they had to use a knife
or a bat or something else besides a gun. And wouldn’t you feel better
if you had to face a criminal who has a knife or bat or something else
besides a gun. It would be a safer and better world world if we do
something to get the guns out of the hands of criminals. Here’s the
plan. NOW DO IT! Read www.mybetteramericaplan.com for more information
Top Opinion
-
jc 2012/07/02 23:22:09Do you want to pass this gun control law?+7What about those of us who own guns for the sport of hunting and shooting?Does that mean a baseball player should only own 2 bats and 2 gloves.Should a golfer only own 2 clubs,should a hockey player only own 2 hockey sticks ect...???

















This poorly thought-out post is virtually facts-free!
You state: “But you have to remember that when we allow ourselves to have guns we have to
do it right or else we have chaos.”
Name the U.S. cities, where violent crime rates have skyrocketed with the reduction of restrictions on guns.
(HINT: *NO WHERE*)
Or put it another way: Name the U.S. cities with *STRICT* gun control laws *AND* crime rates *LOWER* than the national average.
You state: “It’s ether gun control or no control.”
No, it's either Tyranny or Liberty.
You state: “For we cannot control the criminal when we allow them to get a gun and then they go ahead and use it.”
Foolish comment.
Criminal by the very definition disobey the existing laws.
So why do you believe that those willing to commit rape, robbery and murder, would obey a gun control law?
You state: “They, the criminal become something that they would not normally be when they possess a gun .They become possessed by an evilness that makes them do things that no other weapon can match.”
That's another foolish comment.
No they don't, a gun is simply an inanimate object, a tool: Nothing more.
You state: “The criminal would not conduct him or herself in the same way if the criminal had to use a knife, bat or another weapon.”
T...
This poorly thought-out post is virtually facts-free!
You state: “But you have to remember that when we allow ourselves to have guns we have to
do it right or else we have chaos.”
Name the U.S. cities, where violent crime rates have skyrocketed with the reduction of restrictions on guns.
(HINT: *NO WHERE*)
Or put it another way: Name the U.S. cities with *STRICT* gun control laws *AND* crime rates *LOWER* than the national average.
You state: “It’s ether gun control or no control.”
No, it's either Tyranny or Liberty.
You state: “For we cannot control the criminal when we allow them to get a gun and then they go ahead and use it.”
Foolish comment.
Criminal by the very definition disobey the existing laws.
So why do you believe that those willing to commit rape, robbery and murder, would obey a gun control law?
You state: “They, the criminal become something that they would not normally be when they possess a gun .They become possessed by an evilness that makes them do things that no other weapon can match.”
That's another foolish comment.
No they don't, a gun is simply an inanimate object, a tool: Nothing more.
You state: “The criminal would not conduct him or herself in the same way if the criminal had to use a knife, bat or another weapon.”
Then why does the USA have more murders committed with fist and feet, than *ALL* of Japan's murders combines?
You state: “Only a gun gives the criminal a great advantage over there victims.”
Yet another foolish comment.
The worst mass murders in U.S. history, didn't even involve guns.
You state: “Against a knife, bat or other weapon we would feel we might have a chance to defend ourselves. But a gun is a whole different story.”
Still another foolish comment coupled with flawed feelings at a cataclysmic level.
If I used only my bare hands, I could kill you quit easily.
With only a stick, even more so.
But I would *NOT* kill you, unless it was to protect myself or my loved ones from your *CRIMINAL ATTACK*.
Why should we develop laws and policies that *ONLY* affect the *LAW-ABIDING*?
Why do you believe that those willing to violate the much more serious laws against rape, robbery and murder, would somehow be concerned about a *POSSESSION* law?
You state: “So I hope for the good of us all and to make the job of our police officers a lot easier lets get some control over the guns.”
More foolish emotion-based and reason/logic-free nonsense.
Law enforcement is one of the *SAFEST* careers in the USA.
One of the reasons, may be because each officer is *ARMED* while at work.
Another reason law enforcement is one of the *SAFEST* careers in the USA: Criminals go to some trouble to *AVOID* contact with the police, while actively *PREYING* on unarmed non-cops.
And let's not forget, the police seldom arrive in time to even arrest as suspect, much less be in danger from the criminals.
Controlling the guns of the law-abiding, does *NOTHING* to reduce violent crime.
Besides, THE POLICE HAVE NO DUTY TO PROTECT INDIVIDUALS:
“Law enforcement agencies and personnel have no duty to protect individuals from the criminal acts of others.” -Lynch vs North Carolina Department of Justice 1989
This means that if you want protection from violent crime, for you and your loved ones; it’s up to YOU and YOU ALONE to provide it.
But ask yourself this question, in your heart of hearts: Why should a cop risk his life to save something so insignificant (your life or the lives of your loved ones), that even the owner is unwilling to protect it?
You state: “Guns. Some will say you can’t live with them and some say you can’t live without them. However you look at it we are stuck with them. What counts the most is what to do with them and how to keep them out of the hands of those that shouldn’t possess them.”
The best solution is also the simplest: Anyone walking our streets as a freeman, should be able to do so *ARMED*.
“OH! But what about the criminals and crazies?!”
If someone is a menace to society, either through mental defect or criminal behavior, they should *NOT* be allowed to walk out streets FREE, they should be confined until such time as they are no longer a menace to society.
You state: “Now as much as we are all in agreement that we have to have laws in order to keep the guns out of the hands of those that shouldn’t have them isn’t it better to enact policy and laws that would make it harder for criminals to get the guns in the first place.”
Nobody with any intelligence would agree with such total non-sense.
It's *ALREADY* a crime for a criminal to commit rape, robbery and murder; what new laws do you honestly believe a *CRIMINAL* would obey, and why would they obey the new laws?
You state: “In other words lets dry up the gun market place that GIVES the criminal the opportunity to purchase a gun in the first place. How do you do that? EASILY! All we have to do is enact laws that says you are allowed to have a gun but you are only allowed to have two of them. Hunters and gun collectors could have something worked out for their needs All gun sales from this moment on will be registered with the government so that we can get a HANDLE ON THE EASILY EXCESSIVE
ABILITY of the criminal gun market.”
While such stupidity may sound “reasonable” to the profoundly ignorant, the intelligent aren't confused about the meaning of “shall not be infringed”.
The intelligent also know that *FELONS* are *LEGALLY EXEMPT* for any and all gun registrations under Haynes v. U.S., 390 U.S. 85.
Again, controlling the *CRIMINALS* would be the intelligent thing to do.
You state: “Now I know that all you gun freaks are flipping out about registering your FUTURE gun purchases but you got to admit we do have a problem and we got to do something about it .”
While the Anti-Freedom turds may favor stripping our Constitutionally enumerated Rights, because of their cowardice, they prefer to surrender their Freedom over assuming personal responsibility for their own safety.
You state: “The criminals can get guns too easily because any non-criminal can purchase as MANY GUNS AS THEY WANT AND SELL THEM TO THE CRIMINALS!!!!! DO YOU
HEAR WE HAVE TO STOP THAT!!!!”
This is *ALREADY* a *FELONY*.
You state: “Take the initiative out of selling guns and the criminals will have a harder time purchasing guns in the underground gun market place.”
Let's examine this stupid comment under the harsh light of reality, instead of the rosey glow of baseless emotion, shall we?
Even if I gave you $10,000 to do it with, you couldn't *LEGALLY* buy meth within 500 mile of where you are.
However, if you were willing to violate the law, you could buy meth for $20 within 25 miles of where you're sitting.
You state: “Then we will get to the day when many criminals won’t have guns and I’m sure they’ll be a lot less vicious and destructive and evil and easier to deal with.”
That hasn't proven to be true in Canada, England or Austrailia.
You state: “Most of all we’ll take away the one thing that makes them be the worst they can be. Then we’ll have a better world, a safer world, a peaceful world.”
This is simply baseless non-sense: Mexico is “Gun-Free” and has the #4 homicide rate for the world.
You state: “America has problems that beg for solutions.”
Yes it does! Here is how to address the *REAL* problem, which is the COWARDICE of so many.
Here's how 911 calls SHOULD be answered:
911 Operator: "911 Operator, what is the nature of your emergency?"
Caller: "OH GOD! A GROUP OF MEN JUST KICKED IN OUR FRONT DOOR! SEND THE POLICE! PLEASE HURRY!"
911 Operator: "Caller, this is very important: What type of firearm are you holding at this moment?"
Caller: "SOMEONE IS IN MY DAUGHTER'S ROOM! I HEAR HER SCREAMING! PLEASE SEND THE POLICE!! HURRY!!"
911 Operator: "Caller, please calm down. This is critical, what type of firearm are you holding at this moment?"
Caller: "Operator I'm NOT "holding a firearm"! There are NO GUNS in our home! Guns only escalate an already dangerous situation! Now PLEASE send the police!!!!"
911 Operator: "I understand Caller. It is now 02:32, the ' Unarmed Officer Unit' doesn't come on duty until 08:00. When they clock-in, I will immediately dispatch them to your location.
Until then: Stay safe!"
*CLICK*
how about a law to limit DC from trying to redo our constituion without OUR voting on it??????????????????
The government has no place telling anyone what inanimate objects they can and cannot own, no matter what the intended function or design of that object is.
Straw purchases and black market sales are already illegal. And all gun purchases require a background check and two federal forms to be filled out.
If we can't enforce the laws we already have what's the point of another law that criminals will simply ignore other than to restrict the rights of law abiding citizens?
But what the poster is talking is "People Control"
as MANY GUNS AS THEY WANT AND SELL THEM TO THE CRIMINALS!!!!! DO YOU
HEAR WE HAVE TO STOP THAT!!!!
I LL KEEP MINE..
and a couple of drones?
The right to bear arms is seriously infringed. I want an abomb too.
We'd better get rid of matches and fire since we're 4 times more likely to die in a fire as opposed to a bullet. Let's pass laws againt water too, people are 7 times more likely to drown as compared to dying from a bullet. Oh my goodness! Let's all wring our hands and ban automobiles while we're at it since you're 35 times more likely to die from a MVA than from a bullet. Hell we'd better just ban stupid people all together because they're involved in 60,000 unintentional deaths a year, that's 62 times more likely to die around dumb people as opposed to a bullet.
/SeTSYouGM6I/AAAAAAAAATA/vCRL...
keep the change well keep our guns
But to answer your question, NO, we don't need any more gun control laws. They serve no purpose other than attempting to turn citizens into subjects.
What happens when law abiding citizens are limited and the criminals who don't obey the laws, do just that?
What problem has been solved by the 10,003rd gun law?
What problem has been exacerbated?
and leave the rest of us alone?