Go take a look at all of the Mass Shootings over the last 10 years and you will find all of them were executed by Progressive Democrats / Libritards. This last one was a OWS member.
Then go and look at all of the sold Blue States. I don't know any of them that still have the death penalty. Fine - go ahead and shoot 15 people and we will feed you for life.
Now I listen to the Dummycrats talk about gun laws. Stupid people....we need to take the guns from you. Your "anything goes" ideology and removal of the Death Penalty remove any deturance to commiting these crimes.
Progressives are a clear and present danger to this country. Just shoot enough people and then cry for gun laws that the Conservatives will not follow.
You have Bloomberg - (the soda pop queen) wanting to control the entire country. Funny how you won't find any Conservatives doing these crimes.
Investigation and arrest of Obama if he is a Threat to National Security. From that point it is a "goosey, goosey, who has the Golden egg. and if there is none then they shall all be turned out and we must start over with the Democrats. if at all. We don't need more than one party.
.............. I believe We need a major overhaul of the present gun control laws.........We definitely need the strictest gun control laws in place, and not be influenced by the National Rifleman's Association, Aurora, Colorado, changes everything........or should..........
Not so fast with the Republican vs. Democrat false dilemma GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) stuff.
Let's give example to a case that defies such divisionism.
"Although both Arizona and Michigan are host to militant anti-tax, anti-government, survivalist and racist groups,...His only known affiliations are as a registered Republican in his New York days, and as a member of the National Rifle Association while he was in the Army." -- http://archives.cnn.com/2001/...
Despite his above past associations, Timothy McVeigh became a militant anarchist who often painted the entire government, both major political parties included, with the same broad anarchist brush. He was rabidly pro gun rights to the point that gun rights were a huge part of his ethos, but he was anti-socialist (important to note, what with the current common Republican practice of portraying anyone left of them as socialists).
In a 23-page farewell letter to a friend, McVeigh had this to say:
"Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.
It also stands to reason that anyone who sympathizes with the enemy or gives aid or comfort to said enemy is likewise guilty. I have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitut...
Not so fast with the Republican vs. Democrat false dilemma GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) stuff.
Let's give example to a case that defies such divisionism.
"Although both Arizona and Michigan are host to militant anti-tax, anti-government, survivalist and racist groups,...His only known affiliations are as a registered Republican in his New York days, and as a member of the National Rifle Association while he was in the Army." -- http://archives.cnn.com/2001/...
Despite his above past associations, Timothy McVeigh became a militant anarchist who often painted the entire government, both major political parties included, with the same broad anarchist brush. He was rabidly pro gun rights to the point that gun rights were a huge part of his ethos, but he was anti-socialist (important to note, what with the current common Republican practice of portraying anyone left of them as socialists).
In a 23-page farewell letter to a friend, McVeigh had this to say:
"Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.
It also stands to reason that anyone who sympathizes with the enemy or gives aid or comfort to said enemy is likewise guilty. I have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic and I will. And I will because not only did I swear to, but I believe in what it stands for in every bit of my heart, soul and being.
I know in my heart that I am right in my struggle, Steve. I have come to peace with myself, my God and my cause. Blood will flow in the streets, Steve. Good vs. Evil. Free Men vs. Socialist Wannabe Slaves. Pray it is not your blood, my friend."
I believe in the right to bear arms but what do messages that are more rapidly pro gun rights and full of hate get us? What does any of the hateful Democrat vs. Republican hate get us. Is it quality dialog? Or can it occasionally go more sour than just hate? Can it get quite literally incendiary?
You will find that the behavioral and ideological profiles of mass shooters, bombers and others who terrorize us with their violence in any way often defy any Republican vs. Democrat false dilemma.
oh fantastic .... only a lame brain could come up with something so inane. Where did you come up with that statistic? Or shoudl I say where did you PULL that stat from? Never mind ... we already know
Here is one for you. You COULDNT disarm Democrats in any way shape or form. Democrats are armed with FACTS ... something CONs know jack sh*t about.
The United Nations' "Arms Trade Treaty" Conference is in full swing in New York City.
Anti-gun international bureaucrats are already bragging that this conference will craft "the most important initiative ever regarding arms regulation . . ."
In fact, after keeping the details of their so-called "Small Arms Treaty" quiet for three years, the gun-grabbers are now coming clean with EXACTLY what they want . . .
Full-scale GLOBAL gun registration followed by confiscation, especially in the U.S.
To make matters worse, Hillary Clinton has already given this anti-gun nightmare the Obama administration's full blessing.
What is a libtard and dummycrat?? Those terms do not exist. There has been plenty of violence by all groups in the United States. You can't label an entire group off some psycho. Most of us would never even dream of doing such horrid things and these are the things in part that make people want to rid our streets of guns.
I disagree on one point. I do not blame guns, I blame humans. We are reckless and it's scary to think of every household having a gun or more. I mostly think of children in the household who are curious and very self efficient at times. They can even get into a locked case. They accidentally shoot someone or themselves and it's a tragedy. I don't think we should all resort to needing guns to feel safe. The other reason I say this is that the odds of any of us actually needing one to defend ourselves is very minimal. And if someone wants to kill us they will find a way, whether we have a gun or not. I think the odds of an accident are much higher then that of needing the gun at some point.
My dad keeps a hand gun next to his bed and as a kid I did get curious. I knew that I should never touch it, but one evening when they were out I played with it. I took all the bullets out, pointing and clicking it, and once I pointed at my foot and clicked. To my horror I had left one bullet in the gun by accident. I was horrified! I called a friend to come over and be with me...I was that upset. My dad told me he accidentally shot a hole in the roof as a kid. So I guess with this happening and not being familiar with guns, I feel safer without them. :)
Let's give example to a case that defies such divisionism.
"Although both Arizona and Michigan are host to militant anti-tax, anti-government, survivalist and racist groups,...His only known affiliations are as a registered Republican in his New York days, and as a member of the National Rifle Association while he was in the Army." -- http://archives.cnn.com/2001/...
Despite his above past associations, Timothy McVeigh became a militant anarchist who often painted the entire government, both major political parties included, with the same broad anarchist brush. He was rabidly pro gun rights to the point that gun rights were a huge part of his ethos, but he was anti-socialist (important to note, what with the current common Republican practice of portraying anyone left of them as socialists).
In a 23-page farewell letter to a friend, McVeigh had this to say:
"Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.
It also stands to reason that anyone who sympathizes with the enemy or gives aid or comfort to said enemy is likewise guilty. I have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitut...
Let's give example to a case that defies such divisionism.
"Although both Arizona and Michigan are host to militant anti-tax, anti-government, survivalist and racist groups,...His only known affiliations are as a registered Republican in his New York days, and as a member of the National Rifle Association while he was in the Army." -- http://archives.cnn.com/2001/...
Despite his above past associations, Timothy McVeigh became a militant anarchist who often painted the entire government, both major political parties included, with the same broad anarchist brush. He was rabidly pro gun rights to the point that gun rights were a huge part of his ethos, but he was anti-socialist (important to note, what with the current common Republican practice of portraying anyone left of them as socialists).
In a 23-page farewell letter to a friend, McVeigh had this to say:
"Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.
It also stands to reason that anyone who sympathizes with the enemy or gives aid or comfort to said enemy is likewise guilty. I have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic and I will. And I will because not only did I swear to, but I believe in what it stands for in every bit of my heart, soul and being.
I know in my heart that I am right in my struggle, Steve. I have come to peace with myself, my God and my cause. Blood will flow in the streets, Steve. Good vs. Evil. Free Men vs. Socialist Wannabe Slaves. Pray it is not your blood, my friend."
I believe in the right to bear arms but what do messages that are more rapidly pro gun rights and full of hate get us? What does any of the hateful Democrat vs. Republican hate get us. Is it quality dialog? Or can it occasionally go more sour than just hate? Can it get quite literally incendiary?
You will find that the behavioral and ideological profiles of mass shooters, bombers and others who terrorize us with their violence in any way often defy any Republican vs. Democrat false dilemma.
Here is one for you. You COULDNT disarm Democrats in any way shape or form. Democrats are armed with FACTS ... something CONs know jack sh*t about.
...I don't think so.
Can you answer?
Fail.
Blog schmog. You gave the name of one guy, which I looked up, and found no comments on his political affiliations.
The main problem with those on the Right is the insistence to make everything left/right. Crazy people come from all walks of life.
We should spend our efforts on determining solutions to this problem. I believe it is in mental health education and treatment.
The United Nations' "Arms Trade Treaty" Conference is in full swing in New York City.
Anti-gun international bureaucrats are already bragging that this conference will craft "the most important initiative ever regarding arms regulation . . ."
In fact, after keeping the details of their so-called "Small Arms Treaty" quiet for three years, the gun-grabbers are now coming clean with EXACTLY what they want . . .
Full-scale GLOBAL gun registration followed by confiscation, especially in the U.S.
To make matters worse, Hillary Clinton has already given this anti-gun nightmare the Obama administration's full blessing.