Should Victims Receive Compensation for 'Surprise STDs'?
SodaHead News
2012/06/07 18:57:51
|
|
|||||
|
481 votes
|
|
44% | |||
|
601 votes
|
|
56% | |||
A 49-year-old Oregon woman found a little bit of respite this week when the court awarded her a whopping $900,000 as compensation for contracting herpes from a 69-year-old man on their fourth date. According to the L.A. Times, the jury decided the woman was only "25% responsible" for contracting the STD because the man failed to tell her that he had it before they had sex.
Randall Vogt, attorney for the plaintiff, explained, "He was 69, my client was a very attractive 49. My argument to the jury was he just wanted to sink his hooks into her." There were also suggestions of battery ("aggressive consummation"), which made it impossible for her to put a condom on him, and she was able to give evidence that she had not had the STD prior to the encounter. They met on eHarmony. Do you think it's fair to grant the unknowning recipient of an STD legal compensation?

Randall Vogt, attorney for the plaintiff, explained, "He was 69, my client was a very attractive 49. My argument to the jury was he just wanted to sink his hooks into her." There were also suggestions of battery ("aggressive consummation"), which made it impossible for her to put a condom on him, and she was able to give evidence that she had not had the STD prior to the encounter. They met on eHarmony. Do you think it's fair to grant the unknowning recipient of an STD legal compensation?























As others have mentioned, rape (victim) would be the only time a person should be rewarded if the perp can be determined.
In cases of rape, victim is 0% responsible.
If a rape victim gives their assailant an STD, then the victim should be held 0% responsible and get hero status.
Brilliant!!!
Brilliant!!!
have told her, and it was her responsibilty.