Quantcast

Should Trust Funds Be Off Limits To Politicians?

davidgoessplat 2012/08/19 07:08:12
Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust fund.
No, politicians should continue to be allowed to take money from trust funds if they need/want to.
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
As you may know, the government has been using money in trust funds for decades to spend on other programs. For example money has been taken from the social security trust fund in order to make the deficit appear smaller than it really is.

The American people were sold the idea of a trust fund as a "lock box" where the money they put in would be saved for them. Are the American people being taken advantage of by politicians on both sides of the isle?

Should government trust funds of all types be off limits and left alone by politicians?

For an example, see the article.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2011/07/13/what-h...
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Mr Chin 2012/08/19 07:50:57
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    Mr Chin
    +6
    It's a greedy greedy government.
    greedy government

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody 2012/08/19 18:23:02
    Undecided
    Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody
    +2
    People should demand to know the truth about their funds.

    After being led to believe that government would take better care of their money, we are finding that instead of Trust Fund Managers or CEOs taking a cut and playing fast with the money the same process is being done by civil servants and elected officials. The public has no chance of gaining intrest, but the government is using our money to play their shell games and float their favours among themselves.
  • DDogbreath 2012/08/19 16:47:02
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    DDogbreath
    +3
    Of course how do you think Bill Clinton made his "numbers" look so rosy?

    Good Poll Have a cigar!

    clinton numbers rosy poll cigar
  • Seonag 2012/08/19 15:53:24
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    Seonag
    +3
    YES! And all funds should be repaid into those trust funds before another penny in so called 'aide' to foreign governments is paid!
  • jimmie 2012/08/19 14:11:46
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    jimmie
    +1
    Do you want Goverment to have all your money. Just look at how many people lost there savings when the stock market took our 401K's down the tubes, The Goverment made us invest all we worked for so they could take it away . Big Business has there fingers in Elected officals pockets, and no good will come by letting them take our trust funds.
  • Joe The... jimmie 2012/08/19 20:43:01
    Joe The Economist
    "Just look at how many people lost there savings when the stock market took our 401K's down the tubes,"

    Assuming that they didn't sell at the peak of the crisis, the tubes have replenished the accounts. There are individuals who lost money in the market. EVERYONE who has followed the investment policy of Social Security over the last 70 years has lost money. The stock market outperformed that benchmark about 50 to 1.
  • mk, Smartass Oracle 2012/08/19 13:39:04
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    mk, Smartass Oracle
    +3
    Keeps the pols away






    pols
  • sky blue pink - American 2012/08/19 12:30:38
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    sky blue pink - American
    Have a nice day !
  • ed 2012/08/19 11:39:04
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    ed
    +2
    off limits and any money that has been taken replaced even if obama has to bailout the trust funds with his own money.
  • ☆Hitler was a community org... 2012/08/19 10:16:43
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    ☆Hitler was a community organiz☆
    +3
    for starters
  • ConLibFraud 2012/08/19 10:15:25
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    ConLibFraud
    We all have birth trust accounts that are worth millions and billions!!! The government and banks use them without our permission!!!
  • Mr Chin 2012/08/19 07:50:57
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    Mr Chin
    +6
    It's a greedy greedy government.
    greedy government
  • Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +5
    They have been plundering it for a long time..I wish I could have all my Social Security money back so I can invest it the way I want too!
  • Dodgerfan 2012/08/19 07:25:50
    Yes, trust funds should be left alone only for the beneficiaries of the trust...
    Dodgerfan
    +3
    A no brainer but politicians for the most part don't, well, you know.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 16:44:56

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals