Gee, I wonder how this is going to turn out.
Should there be an independent investigation of the Obama national security leaks?
FanOreilly
2012/06/14 18:41:46
|
|
|||||
|
211 votes
|
|
92% | ||
|
18 votes
|
|
8% | ||
Obama's white house has leaked national security secrets to improve his chances of re-election. Obama's attorney general Eric Holder has appointed two attorneys that report to him to investigate the leaks including one Obama donor with close personal ties to Eric Holder.
White House security leaks continue to fester as critics react to a flow of leaks from the White House that some believe are calculated to burnish the president's national security credentials at the expense of national security.
Should there be an independent investigation of the Obama national security leaks?
White House security leaks continue to fester as critics react to a flow of leaks from the White House that some believe are calculated to burnish the president's national security credentials at the expense of national security.
On Sunday, Rep. Peter King, R-New York, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, condemned the leaks on Fox News, insisting they could only have come directly from the White House.
"This is the most shameful cascade of leaks I've ever heard or seen in government," King said. "It's clear from those stories this came right from the White House, came right from the National Security Council, came right from the Situation Room. ... It has to lead to people very high up in the administration in his White House."
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., went on CNN on Sunday andcalled for a special prosecutor, arguing that Attorney General Eric Holder has no credibility with Congress.
McCain described the leaks as the "most egregious breach of intelligence in anybody's memory." Pointing to ongoing congressional frustration with Holder's lack of coopertion on the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal, McCain insisted that Holder's low credibility with Congress prevented him from leading the leaks investigation. "This needs a special counsel, someone entirely independent of the Justice Department," McCain said.
Should there be an independent investigation of the Obama national security leaks?
Read More: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865557454/White...
Top Opinion
-
Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...
+27So let me get this straight...Obama's attorney general has sided with Puerto Rican terrorists, has sided with the black panthers, has sided with Mexican drug cartels and has obstructed investigations by congress into his actions will now appoint an Obama donor to investigate Obama?
Gee, I wonder how this is going to turn out.
Holder will park this deal until after the election if left on his own.
And there SHOULD be another investigation launched over the Fast and Furious murders as well,, whether Holder resigns or not..
Yea, I really trust the DOJ to do their job correctly.
Richard Armitage told Fitzgerald before the investigation even began that HE had talked to Novack about her and it made NO DIFFERENCE.. The time and money was wasted anyway..
MANY names of many people who talked to reporters about Plame came up besides Armitage when the truth came out in this multimillion dollar investigation and YET,,,,, NOT ONE PERSON was prosecuted or even charged with the act and do YOU know WHY??
BECAUSE,,, Valarie Plame was NOT a Secret or Covert Agent at the time and discussing her name with reporters was NOT a CRIME..
SHE lost her covert status in the mid-90s when her IDIOT Husband used to introduce her at Washington Parties as his CIA wife..
...in grade school?
im sur obama got skeletons it will be reveild if he losses.
As for Clinton.. NOTHING that Flynt did served to diminish,, in ANY way,, shape or form,, what Bill Clinton's was guilty of..
If he uncovered additional wrongdoing by others.. GOOD.. But THAT did NOTHING to remove or even question the guilt of William Jefferson CLinton,, President of these United States..
WHAT they're saying is that they want ALL the information that this administration has involving that operation that started and ended under the Obama administration and was a violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW and resulted in the murders of American and Mexican Innocent Civilians alike..
We already KNOW that Holder LIED to COngress ( which has ALWAYS been enough to put ANY republican in Prison ) when he claimed that he NEVER even heard of the operation until the Hearings.. We KNOW this..
We ALSO know that IF there were nothing in those Documents that didn't pose a DIRECT threat to Obama,, he WOULDN'T be going THIS far to HIDE them..
Now.. The left screamed bloody murder and wanted Bush handcuffed and locked up when a 17 year old girl put her panties over the head of a Prisoner halfway around the world.. It happened on HIS watch and was THEREFORE his responsibilitya and the DEMOCRATS wanted Bush's HEAD on a platter....
I don't think that it's all that outrageous to hold Obama at least responsible for an ACT OF WAR committed on our OWN Southern Borders.. After all.. it happened on HIS watch..
If this i...
WHAT they're saying is that they want ALL the information that this administration has involving that operation that started and ended under the Obama administration and was a violation of INTERNATIONAL LAW and resulted in the murders of American and Mexican Innocent Civilians alike..
We already KNOW that Holder LIED to COngress ( which has ALWAYS been enough to put ANY republican in Prison ) when he claimed that he NEVER even heard of the operation until the Hearings.. We KNOW this..
We ALSO know that IF there were nothing in those Documents that didn't pose a DIRECT threat to Obama,, he WOULDN'T be going THIS far to HIDE them..
Now.. The left screamed bloody murder and wanted Bush handcuffed and locked up when a 17 year old girl put her panties over the head of a Prisoner halfway around the world.. It happened on HIS watch and was THEREFORE his responsibilitya and the DEMOCRATS wanted Bush's HEAD on a platter....
I don't think that it's all that outrageous to hold Obama at least responsible for an ACT OF WAR committed on our OWN Southern Borders.. After all.. it happened on HIS watch..
If this is HIS baby then he should FALL and fall HARD.. ESPECIALLY if it turns out to be nothing but an extention of the Left Wing Gun COntrol Agenda as MANY Americans believ.. After all.. he DID make those "Blame America for Mexican Gun Violence " speeches at about the SAME time Fast and Furious got started..
If this is a ROGUE operation then he is STILL responsible and he SHOULD be front and center in trying to uncover EXACTLY what happened,, HOW it happened and WHO caused it to happen..
What's being said here is simple.. "Obama.. RELEASED those documents and END this debate" PROVE your innocence "..
Instead,, he's STONEWALLING those who ARE trying to do THEIR job by trying to find these things out and in SO doing,, he INCRIMMINATES himself in his contemptable defiance and abysmal arrogance..