Gee, I wonder how this is going to turn out.
Should there be an independent investigation of the Obama national security leaks?
FanOreilly
2012/06/14 18:41:46
|
|
|||||
|
211 votes
|
|
92% | ||
|
18 votes
|
|
8% | ||
Obama's white house has leaked national security secrets to improve his chances of re-election. Obama's attorney general Eric Holder has appointed two attorneys that report to him to investigate the leaks including one Obama donor with close personal ties to Eric Holder.
White House security leaks continue to fester as critics react to a flow of leaks from the White House that some believe are calculated to burnish the president's national security credentials at the expense of national security.
Should there be an independent investigation of the Obama national security leaks?
White House security leaks continue to fester as critics react to a flow of leaks from the White House that some believe are calculated to burnish the president's national security credentials at the expense of national security.
On Sunday, Rep. Peter King, R-New York, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, condemned the leaks on Fox News, insisting they could only have come directly from the White House.
"This is the most shameful cascade of leaks I've ever heard or seen in government," King said. "It's clear from those stories this came right from the White House, came right from the National Security Council, came right from the Situation Room. ... It has to lead to people very high up in the administration in his White House."
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., went on CNN on Sunday andcalled for a special prosecutor, arguing that Attorney General Eric Holder has no credibility with Congress.
McCain described the leaks as the "most egregious breach of intelligence in anybody's memory." Pointing to ongoing congressional frustration with Holder's lack of coopertion on the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal, McCain insisted that Holder's low credibility with Congress prevented him from leading the leaks investigation. "This needs a special counsel, someone entirely independent of the Justice Department," McCain said.
Should there be an independent investigation of the Obama national security leaks?
Read More: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865557454/White...
Top Opinion
-
Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...
+27So let me get this straight...Obama's attorney general has sided with Puerto Rican terrorists, has sided with the black panthers, has sided with Mexican drug cartels and has obstructed investigations by congress into his actions will now appoint an Obama donor to investigate Obama?
Gee, I wonder how this is going to turn out.
More polls by FanOreilly
Sort By
- John Boy Bill G5... 2012/06/15 20:52:24
+1I hope and pray that you are right !!!reply - Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/06/15 02:19:23Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+7This is one reason why I start to think that maybe--just maybe--we need an independently elected Attorney General, who gets elected in the odd years.reply
- Pinball Wizard 2012/06/15 02:15:27Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+2I choose that so that the GOP members wouldn't bitch about someone not being impartial. I watch the Presidents news conference. I agree that it would be dangerous to let classified information be released to the public.reply
- Autumn Eltzroth 2012/06/15 01:53:02
- Common ... Autumn ... 2012/06/15 03:11:46This is dumb. Really really stupid and idiotic.reply
- Rodney Common ... 2012/06/15 05:38:01+1WOW, that must have been over the top. He/she/it is completely GONE. Not just DA'd, but gone.reply
- lisa Rodney 2012/06/15 10:53:06+1oooh, I wanted to read it but it's been moderated! Oh well plenty of other dumb and over the top things to read on SH. I probably posted a few dumb statements myself when I get frazzled by some of the Obama lover comments! Lolreply
- Rodney lisa 2012/06/15 23:55:21+1LOL, I have too, out of either frustration or rage.reply
- exhon2009 2012/06/15 01:50:30Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+4Michelle Malkin was fit to be tied. She handed Juan Williams his head in that discussion. The leaks are of the most serious national security implications. I think it was all unnecessary as well. People like me who appreciate killing bad guys and all isn't going to vote for Obama under any circumstances. To appoint a hapless donor that owes his past, (and probably future), career to Eric Holder is Chicago politics at its finest.reply
- Nancy~PWCM~JLA~POTL 2012/06/15 01:41:49 (edited)Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+1What does Independent investigation really mean? It is all corrupt and bought and paid forreply
- Rodney Nancy~P... 2012/06/15 05:39:02The down side of independent investigations is that they get unlimited budgets and report to no one.reply
- wers 2012/06/15 01:16:34Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+3There should be an independent investigation into most of Obama's actions, cabinet, and administration.....but, who will do it, and who will enforce it? Much more of this corruption and the only independent investigation will have to be done by vigilanties....reply
- Pm 2012/06/15 01:15:21Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+2There should always be.reply
- Flash,aka,Mr.Lightning 2012/06/15 00:34:53Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+2Yeah like the Mafi investigating the Mafia.reply
- dlsofsetx 2012/06/15 00:33:40Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+5Holder is the most corrupt AG ever.reply
- shenendoah 2012/06/15 00:32:57Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+5There should be but I doubt if there will be. Corruption rules in obama's administration.reply
- gocar 2012/06/15 00:18:05No, let Obama's friends investigate ObamaRemember when they tried to get to the bottom of the Valerie Plame leak? The people in the WH just refused to show up when subpoenas were issued. That really was a political punishment from the goons in the WH. Did that not put in danger all who she had been in contact with. That was deliberate and we never did get to the bottom of who exactly ordered it done. I think it was Carl Rove (his style) together with Darth Vader.reply
- zbacku gocar 2012/06/15 04:15:01+2Once again you deflect from the issue at hand. How many years ago was that? It's time the Obama and his cronies start taking responsibility for their OWN treasonous actions.reply
- Rodney gocar 2012/06/15 05:45:15+2Valerie Plame had not been a covert operative in over 5 years. All her neighbors and friends knew where she worked. That whole thing was a joke and a circus orchestrated by the anti Bush hate squad.reply
- Boetica 2012/06/15 00:15:21Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+5Eric Holder is a bad joke. He needs to be removed from office, along with his incompetent, ineligible boss. A special prosecutor needs to be appointed.reply
- gocar Boetica 2012/06/15 00:19:27+1Funny how we see the splinter in the other guy's eye but cannot see the beam in our own. I read that somewherereply
- shenendoah gocar 2012/06/15 00:46:50+3Uh oh, did a liberal pick up a Bible. Bet that won't happen again.reply
- Bill G5... shenendoah 2012/06/15 13:05:51+2lol.... remember the devil was well aquainted with the Scriptures too.reply
- shenendoah Bill G5... 2012/06/15 14:34:03+1You know, Bill, you're right. I guess it's a case of knowing your enemy. However it might help the old girl to now where the quote come from.reply
- zbacku gocar 2012/06/15 04:16:13+1Have you looked in a mirror lately. There's a big beam about ready to break the mirror's glass.reply
- 4570GOVT 2012/06/15 00:13:53Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+7ABSOLUTELY ! Holder investigating himself is just laughable .reply
- mac9 2012/06/15 00:11:28Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+7Absolutely.....otherwise it's the fox guarding the hen house.reply
- gocar mac9 2012/06/15 00:21:26+1Special prosecutors are just a more expensive witch hunt. Ken Star cost us million of dollars to decide that Clinton was a womanizer. I wish I would live long enough to find out from Monica who put her up to it. Honestly who pulls their dress up and asked the President if he likes your thong. They knew his weakness alright.reply
- mac9 gocar 2012/06/15 00:49:51+3Why is everything a witch hunt when the DEM'S are suspect? These Obama appointees are all criminals.reply
- zbacku gocar 2012/06/15 04:16:58Yeah, Yeah, we all know. Democrats do NOTHING wrong.reply
- Bill G5... gocar 2012/06/15 13:07:22Clinton was a womanizer but who cares? That's not what he was investigated for.reply
- Maverick Capitalist 2012/06/15 00:05:40Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+6These leaks are far more serious than the Plame CIA issue that landed Scooter Libby in prison. All things equal Holder & Obama should be sitting in the crowbar hotel, for various reasons.reply
- NPC 2012/06/14 23:57:44Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+4This WH will all be voted out on November 6th anyway. Keep these returd Liberals tied up with all kinds of restrictions, subpoenas and legal inquiries. until the Voters kick these tax and spend Progressives out of Congress and our WH.reply
- Fashionable60s 2012/06/14 23:52:41Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+6Rightfully so. Who could trust the AG or Obama?reply
- Boetica Fashion... 2012/06/15 00:17:13+3The New Black Panthers, the Muslim Brotherhood, and any other anti-American organization.reply
- Murph 65 2012/06/14 23:50:48Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+4I'm pretty much for independent counsel whenever anything comes up regarding WH or congress or an agency of the government. That way we don't end up with even a "hint" of impropriety.reply
- paul 2012/06/14 23:39:57
- Fighting4U 2012/06/14 23:25:34Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+5Get em!!!!reply
- Gahnzo 2012/06/14 23:18:35Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+4Actually, Attorney General Holder is the one who needs to be investigated. His entire reign has been one of stonewalling, obfuscation, lies, and misdirection, oh and let us not forget the smugness and smirk. His contempt of Congress is growing every day. This man needs to go, and then needs to be investigated for all of the crimes that he has covered up under the guise of "Attorney General"...reply
- sissi 2012/06/14 23:12:29Yes, there should be an independent investigation into the national security ...+3Of course their should be an independent investigation these are national security leaks...reply
«« First « Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Next »
Last »
