Should the USA suspend democracy until the economy recovers? Democrats say yes.
Democrats say yes!
Remember all the insane allegations that Bush was a dictator?
To my knowledge, Republicans never called for the end of democracy...or just a temporary suspension.
Why would the Democrats who only a few years ago cry shrill screams of 'dictator!' at Bush then suddenly oppose elections?
Let me see...why would the Democrats not want to have elections....?
Could this be why?
Here is Obama's director of the OMB, a huge leftist and of course a Democrat on why the answer to America's problems is LESS democracy.
"To solve the serious problems facing our country, we need to minimize
the harm from legislative inertia by relying more on automatic policies
and depoliticized commissions for certain policy decisions. In other
words, radical as it sounds, we need to counter the gridlock of our
political institutions by making them a bit less democratic."
Wait what? 'a bit less democratic'? You mean like no voting?
A sitting government official wants to decrease democracy a little? WTH?
Yes, that's exactly what liberals mean:
"Speaking to a Cary Rotary Club today, N.C. Gov. Bev Perdue suggested
suspending Congressional elections for two years so that Congress can
focus on economic recovery and not the next election.
"I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two
years and just tell them we won't hold it against them, whatever
decisions they make, to just let them help this country recover. I
really hope that someone can agree with me on that," Perdue said. "You
want people who don't worry about the next election."
Should the USA suspend democracy until the economy recovers?
See Votes by State
News & Politics