Quantcast

Should the U.S. government close the Guantanamo Bay prison?

Vive le Canada Libre!!! 2012/01/12 02:35:39
Canada, eh?
You!
Add Photos & Videos
A series of demonstrations Wednesday in Washington and other cities around the world will mark the 10th anniversary of the prison facility in Guantanamo Bay.

The prison facility in Cuba remains open despite years of political pressure from within the U.S. and from abroad to close the site.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said Monday that U.S. President Barack Obama is still committed to closing the prison.

"I think this is a process that faces obstacles that we're all aware of and we will continue to work through them," Carney said.

Originally a makeshift location to hold prisoners at the beginning of the Afghanistan War, Guantanamo Bay has since grown into a facility similar to a typical jail, with communal blocks for inmates and amenities including video games and cable TV.

Today it holds 171 prisoners, including some awaiting trial on war crimes charges and others the U.S. considers dangerous but cannot be charged for lack of evidence and other reasons.

Critics are angry with Obama for not overcoming resistance in Congress to keep the prison open, and for signing the National Defence Authorization Act on Dec. 31, which includes a provision that allows indefinite military detention without trial.

Read More: http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity/2012/01/shoul...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Muskoka 2012/06/20 03:57:12
    Yes
    Muskoka
    Absolutely, they are illegally on foreign soil. They need to get the hell out.
  • Vieuphoria 2012/01/12 17:09:31
    Yes
    Vieuphoria
    yes. just yes.
  • KingdomNow 2012/01/12 04:45:34
    Yes
    KingdomNow
    +2
    Such criminal facilities do not belong on US soil. I would have no problem with similar concentration camps in some allied country.

    You cannot defend the US Constitution by violating the US Constitution.
  • tellmewhy 2012/01/12 04:10:54
    Undecided
    tellmewhy
    it's up to the authority in charge to decide
  • Muskoka tellmewhy 2012/06/20 03:57:57
    Muskoka
    They have no authority to be there.
  • tellmewhy Muskoka 2012/07/10 04:30:01
    tellmewhy
    same can be said to you and I!
  • Muskoka tellmewhy 2012/07/14 19:14:03 (edited)
    Muskoka
    Neither my government or I are in Guantanamo.
  • antiteaparty 2012/01/12 03:15:22
    Yes
    antiteaparty
    +2
    What if we closed GITMO and then the ship that we moved them on mysteriously sunk? I'm just say what if that happened? I mean you know if you routed through the Bermuda Triangle you never know what happens... closed gitmo ship moved mysteriously sunk routed bermuda triangle
  • flaca BN-0 2012/01/12 03:05:29
    Undecided
    flaca BN-0
    +2
    They can't. Obama wanted to and asked each state to take a few prisoners into its prisons. They said no way. He had no choice but to keep GITMO open. This despite the fact that some prisons have a 100% success rate (i.e. NO escapees EVER)
  • Muskoka flaca BN-0 2012/06/20 03:58:36
    Muskoka
    They have the option of building a facility and moving them. They have had over 10 years to do that.
  • alonnastorm 2012/01/12 03:00:32
    Yes
    alonnastorm
    +2
    It needs to be closed! We have to realize that we can't continue 2 bully people around the world. This attitude only makes us bigger targets!
  • Beccy 2012/01/12 02:41:42
    Yes
    Beccy
    +4
    It should never have been opened in the first place
  • Cyan9 2012/01/12 02:40:47
    Yes
    Cyan9
    +2
    I wish he had followed through: http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
  • Reggie☮ 2012/01/12 02:39:57
    Undecided
    Reggie☮
    +1
    Just not sure.
  • Cyan9 (▪‿▪)Do... 2012/01/12 02:41:13
    Cyan9
    Why?
  • flaca BN-0 Cyan9 2012/01/12 03:09:30 (edited)
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    let me help you on this. Some of the prisoners are clearly dangerous terrorists. Not all, but some. Obama asked each state to take a few of the prisoners into their prisons so he could shut down GITMO. You can't let them all go. We already have reports that those released under Bush have already joined camps run by AQ to re-offend. We even had states that had a 100% non escapee record that refused the prisoners.
    The states were reluctant. They chose GITMO.
    So there you go. If no states will take them, what other option is there?
  • Muskoka flaca BN-0 2012/06/20 04:00:23 (edited)
    Muskoka
    They have had years to move those prisoners. They have no right to be on the island in the first place and have illegally stalled. They need to take care of their own prisoners and not inflict their problems on another nation.

    A facility could easily have been built in the time they have been stalling.
  • flaca BN-0 (▪‿▪)Do... 2012/01/12 03:07:02
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    agreed. Until prisons in the States accept the indisputably guilty ones there is no other option.
  • Muskoka flaca BN-0 2012/06/20 04:01:33
    Muskoka
    They have had years to move those prisoners. They have no right to be on the island in the first place and have illegally stalled. They need to take care of their own prisoners and not inflict their problems on another nation.

    A facility could easily have been built in the time they have been stalling.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/20 04:52:04

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals