Quantcast

Should the US Dominate the World Economically and Militarily?

JMCC 2012/09/23 10:37:58
Related Topics: US
Yes because...
No because...
Undecided
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Does the world want or need it?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • ed 2012/09/23 11:27:13
    No because...
    ed
    +5
    each country should fend for themselves and America needs to stop giving so much it's not our duty or place.When there is a disaster or something then we can help out with what ever is needed.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Red Branch 2012/09/24 19:31:31
    Undecided
    Red Branch
    We should have stayed out of WWI, we destroyed 2 Empires that would have kept Europe stabelized. Life would be so much better for the rest of the world if the US had wrapped itself up behind our Navy in WWII after we had withdrawn from the Philippines in the late 1930s.
    Hitler and Stalin, Tojo and many others were really decent guys that would have stayed that way if the US had minded their own business. But we were just too beligerent.

    That means that we would have had to severely restrict immigration to the US. It sends the wrong message. Liberals claim our culture is no better than any other nation, at best and at the worst in most cases our culture is sub-standard. Every time we allow someone asylum here, we are saying that we are better than you.

    We no longer need to send disaster relief supplies anywhere because the US does is get in the way or screw thing up beyond repair.

    Rest assured folks; those days are gone, nothing but an unpleasant memory.

    We can start by making amends. Send home the illegal aliens, all 30 million of them.
  • JMCC Red Branch 2012/09/24 19:34:17
    JMCC
    +1
    Some might argue 300 million, but it is all a matter of perspective isn't it?
  • Red Branch JMCC 2012/09/24 19:36:04
    Red Branch
    +1
    It that is the case, you had best get ready for about 150 million returnees to your corner of the world.
  • JMCC Red Branch 2012/09/24 20:02:44
    JMCC
    +1
    Hell why not? Seems like that already - so the more the merrier. Could be one hell of a party!!! :)
  • Red Branch JMCC 2012/09/25 00:59:31
    Red Branch
    +1
    Sounds good to me. Everybody loves a party.
  • ✞Knight of Honor 2012/09/24 16:45:33
    Undecided
    ✞Knight of Honor
    We are currently doing it half way. We should either go back to isolationism or go full circle.
  • Dogzebra 2012/09/24 15:18:16
    None of the above
    Dogzebra
    Dominate the world militarily and economically? When has that ever happen? Clinton signed NAFTA and GATT into law. If we don't export goods or tax imports, how can any nation survive? So, so much for our economy.

    Clinton was also responsible for hundreds of military base closings and the downsizing of our forces here and abroad. We're spread so thin right now that we've had to deploy our Nat'l Guards to fight our wars in the Middle East. U.S. Navy ports have all but emptied out. Many empty military bases are being remodeled and converted as if to hold people for unknown purposes.

    Sounds to me like you want our POTUS to go on another apology tour.
  • krayzrick 2012/09/24 12:39:18
    No because...
    krayzrick
    +1
    We should take care of our own home first...
  • stevmackey 2012/09/24 10:49:11 (edited)
    Yes because...
    stevmackey
    +1
    We do not want the weak image that Obama likes. Theodore Roosevelt is credited for saying that you should "speak softly and carry a big stick". How true that is today.
  • medwreck 2012/09/24 07:56:57
    Undecided
    medwreck
    +1
    If I can opt-out of paying for it, do what thou wilt.
  • ☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/09/24 07:10:38
    No because...
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +2
    We need to take care of our own problems.
  • Jayfeather 2012/09/24 04:39:39
    No because...
    Jayfeather
    +2
    Domination is evil. Coexistence is key.
  • Red 2012/09/24 03:33:22
  • Frank Stephens 2012/09/23 23:35:10
    Yes because...
    Frank Stephens
    American isolationism in the 1930s was a major factor resulting in WWII. Isolationists advocated non-involvement in European and Asian conflicts and non-entanglement in international politics. We hear the same arguments today – even as Americans are killed abroad and, on September 11, 2001, here at home.
  • Night71 2012/09/23 22:01:55
    No because...
    Night71
    +2
    Look at America now. All going down the toilet. They are already dragging other countries with them. Who won the war against terror? The US certainly never came close. The last thing all other countries need is the US to interfere in the money department. Guess it's the NWO coming fast.
  • Mike 2012/09/23 21:18:12
    No because...
    Mike
    +2
    absolute power, corrupts absolutely
  • redhorse29 2012/09/23 20:54:13
    No because...
    redhorse29
    +2
    In most cases we should let many if not most nations alone. We do not need them nor the burden of buying their false alliance. If trade and mutual assistance is there fine but if a nation dislikes us than screw them.
  • Jan 2012/09/23 20:50:25
    No because...
    Jan
    +3
    No nation should be dominated by another. We should all aim for equality and being able to get along with each other
  • BlueRepublican 2012/09/23 18:47:25
    Yes because...
    BlueRepublican
    Yes because the rest of the world is too stupid to figure out that if they work together, build alliances and take control of their monetary policy (especially dumping the dollar as reserve currency) than we will be helpless without them.
    They are too busy fighting with each other to figure out that we need them much more than they need us.
    Example: If all Latin American countries banded together and refused to sell food to the U.S. the American people would starve.
    It's all written in the 48 laws of power.
  • quantix 2012/09/23 18:36:56
    No because...
    quantix
    +2
    Remember rome? Remember a big contributer to their fall?

    Overstreaching their influence
  • dubbie 2012/09/23 18:28:55
    Yes because...
    dubbie
    +1
    The weaker you are The easier you fall, Its not going to persuade the world to like us because we are weaker But it will persuade them to attacks us The stronger the military mite the less the problem
  • quantix dubbie 2012/09/23 18:38:02
    quantix
    +1
    Rule with a big stick? Sometimes you can get a stick that is too big to carry, it is hard to have so many vested military intrests in so many regions. just my 2 cents
  • dubbie quantix 2012/09/23 18:43:06
    dubbie
    +1
    Oh I didn`t say keep the military in so many regions,But you dont go gutting the system to levels that a draft has to be implimented to save your a##
  • Buoyant Leadraft 2012/09/23 17:51:54
    Yes because...
    Buoyant Leadraft
    +1
    Many of our European friends will not like this answer, but America has really become a stop-gap against western global monetary collapse. Why do we still have troops in Germany? We need to stop being the military force for other countries. It hurts us economically. Americans don't want to be the worlds baby sitter, but we also don't want to become irrelevant in the century of China's rise.
  • redneck woman 2012/09/23 17:22:15
    No because...
    redneck woman
    +2
    We need to take care of ourselves, & let the rest of the world take care of themsleves. We need to stop being their piggy bank & protectors.
  • Barbi Rose 2012/09/23 17:08:35
    Undecided
    Barbi Rose
    +1
    Military no but strong enough to do anything we need to get done. Economicly It should be like the olympic the best should win and everyone should try to be the best because it is what drives jobs and their ecomonies and ultimately their country. Right?
  • Cal 2012/09/23 17:06:53
    Yes because...
    Cal
    +1
    World Peace. Just think of it. Should we. Yes. Can we, or will we? No.
  • Pat 2012/09/23 17:04:59
    No because...
    Pat
    +2
    I don't think the American people want to be the policeman or the defender of the world. Maybe years ago it was possible but those days are over. With all the weapons out there, all the people who are starving, undereducated, religious zealots wanting to kill us, I don't see how we could do it even if we wanted to. I think it's more important now to look after our own people.
  • De verdad 2012/09/23 16:45:19
    None of the above
    De verdad
    +2
    The propaganda money has been going on for yrs and needs to stop.We need that money here!!
  • mich52 2012/09/23 16:38:41 (edited)
    Undecided
    mich52
    I don't see it being of much importance, China is the only country that comes close to us militarily.. Economically we'll be close enough too.
    Funny observation, most if not all of the Yes votes are the typical RWNJ's..
  • Vision of Verve 2012/09/23 16:31:21
  • MR. 2012/09/23 16:25:19 (edited)
    None of the above
    MR.
    DOMINATE? YOU'VE BEEN READING "TOO MANY" COMIC BOOKS! (MARVEL THAT?)
  • Alvin 2012/09/23 16:17:22
    Undecided
    Alvin
    With the possible exception of WWII, every where we have interfered has resulted in loss of prestige, more enemies and more animosity being turned towards us. and only through the constant infusion of US dollars can we say we have some allies (perhaps with the exception of the UK). Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Nicaragua, Panama, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, Cuba, the list goes on. What would happen if we stopped paying the to be our friends?

    Meantime the infusion of US dollars into other countries have resulted in our present financial mess, schools that are ineffectual, decaying infrastructure, increasing poverty, less access to medical care, a generation of kids so far below the rest of the world in the maths and sciences that we have to keep importing foreign graduates to work here (think doctors and nurses, IT specialists), a mounting number of unemployed people while more and more jobs and manufacturing are being sent overseas and a growing section of the country that only cares where their next fix is coming from.

    Hell, we cant even run our own country and finances!
  • Racefish 2012/09/23 16:06:34
    Yes because...
    Racefish
    We are not a nation of losers. We are about the only nation that still gives billions to our enemies, and one of the few nations that support individual initiative and excellence.
  • Max 2012/09/23 15:38:12
    Yes because...
    Max
    +1
    I am happy with our domination. I can't imagine living under another nation's dominant influence.

    I realize our economic domination is in jeopardy because of our debt and our ability to pay it off is also dwindling. We need to do some serious course correction economically.
  • Red Max 2012/09/24 03:43:56
  • Georgia50 2012/09/23 15:23:18
    Yes because...
    Georgia50
    +2
    In the absence of a militarily powerful superpower, things will get worse very quick. That superpower does not have to be the United States, but the United States is the only nation able to project the force needed. If that need is not met, other nefarious forces will fill that vacuum.
  • Red Georgia50 2012/09/24 03:45:46
  • Georgia50 Red 2012/09/24 03:51:32
    Georgia50
    +1
    Very possible, but China has its own problems: corruption and pissing off its Pacific maritime neighbors. We can still put 10 aircraft carrier task groups on station around the world. No other nation even comes close to that. Russia's navy looks great at the Democratic convention, but in fact it's little more than a few poorly maintained rusting hulks.
  • Red Georgia50 2012/09/24 05:14:45 (edited)

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 06:58:56

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals