World police? No.
Playing a major global role to ensure our allies are safe from attack - and to ensure our interests (and the interests of our close allies) are not stepped on - yes.
Other major powers on the globe will step into any vacuum created by U.S. absence from the world stage....to our detriment, and the detriment of our allies.
Should the United States be the policeman of the WORLD??!!
BlueRepublican
2012/08/05 19:10:59
|
|
|||||
|
7 votes
|
|
6% | |||
|
86 votes
|
|
80% | |||
|
15 votes
|
|
14% | |||
It's a very expensive endeavor we have taken upon ourselves. It takes a lot of taxpayer money to keep this operation going. Someone's gotta pay for all those military bases overseas protecting the sovereignty of our allies. Making sure that THEIR people are protected from enemy threats.

Furthermore, it takes BILLIONS of taxpayer foreign aid every year to keep everything running seamlessly. Paying off dictators and kings is definitely cheaper than overthrowing their govt, but much more expensive in the long run. Special contracts for them and unfair trading deals for us keeps the relationships stable.
What's really bad is when we have to borrow money to fund these wars/conflicts. Then on top of paying for the war, we have to pay back the interest on the DEBT. And after the mission is complete, we STILL have to rebuild/reconstruct the entire country/region which costs even MORE money, and of course, add them to the list of international welfare, I mean, American taxpayer foreign Aid recipients.
I know that someone has to police the world. The world could not run without someone interfering in the affairs of others. Someone has to pick sides during civil wars and enact war-time laws on citizens during peacetime. Someone's soldiers have to go out and fight and die for 'strategic interests', whatever that means (maybe oil, dunno?).

So, my question is, does it have to be us? Maybe if we didn't, then we would not have to spend 25% of our annual budget on military/defense spending. Maybe then, some of that money can go to education (6%), veterans benefits (3%), or go towards paying down the interest on our debt (7%).
What do you think? I want you to join the discussion and vote right now, leave me a comment, reply, share with all your friends, and RAVE!!!!

Furthermore, it takes BILLIONS of taxpayer foreign aid every year to keep everything running seamlessly. Paying off dictators and kings is definitely cheaper than overthrowing their govt, but much more expensive in the long run. Special contracts for them and unfair trading deals for us keeps the relationships stable.
What's really bad is when we have to borrow money to fund these wars/conflicts. Then on top of paying for the war, we have to pay back the interest on the DEBT. And after the mission is complete, we STILL have to rebuild/reconstruct the entire country/region which costs even MORE money, and of course, add them to the list of international welfare, I mean, American taxpayer foreign Aid recipients.

I know that someone has to police the world. The world could not run without someone interfering in the affairs of others. Someone has to pick sides during civil wars and enact war-time laws on citizens during peacetime. Someone's soldiers have to go out and fight and die for 'strategic interests', whatever that means (maybe oil, dunno?).

So, my question is, does it have to be us? Maybe if we didn't, then we would not have to spend 25% of our annual budget on military/defense spending. Maybe then, some of that money can go to education (6%), veterans benefits (3%), or go towards paying down the interest on our debt (7%).
What do you think? I want you to join the discussion and vote right now, leave me a comment, reply, share with all your friends, and RAVE!!!!
Top Opinion
-
trentinafur 2012/08/05 21:24:21NO, tell me why






















First rate stupid question.
Whoever suggested he was a pacifist? Oh, that would be you.
Exactly how does, "We have a POTUS who is attempting to get others to step up to the plate when the issue is in their interest." translate into "pacifist" ? You gotta go here because it is one helluva stretch.
It doesn't translate as such except in your mind but I understand. See, I deal with people like you every day. I also am from AZ and listen to the right wing agenda pushed on me DAILY through our over-reaching Governor Jan Batsh!t and kooky legislators who think it is OK to knock a girlfriend around in public then claim "legislative immunity" to keep their ass out of the jail where the girlfriend is headed. OR ask the taxpayers to refund their recall election expenses. OR sell the Capitol Building and suggest the taxpayers buy it back at a $3 million dollar hike. OR flip the bird at Obama on everything including his energy plans when AZ is clearly making good on wind and solar which Romney wants to defund.
Need I continue?
http://www.cleantechlaw.org/2...
Yeah, and I haven't had an electricity bill for over 20 years because solar doesn't work. HA!
You keep feeding your $ to Big Bro Energy. I'll keep my solar going and if the grid goes down, I'LL still have power!
There are quite a few areas where I have issues with obama, but I will be voting for him, doing volunteer work for his election campaign and contributing to his campaign. Why? Because Mitt Romney or any of the other politicians who tried to get the republican nomination, being president is absolutely horrifying.
It's a "democrat thing".
There are many countries whose economies are flourishing, but for whom the U.S. still provides a security umbrella. Let these countries foot the bill for their own defense and bring U.S. forces home. This would do much to diminish our ballooning budget deficits.
Even then, I don't believe we should be policing the world, losing soldiers for other nations' benefit just because. We are the only nation that COULD be the world's police force, but in actual fact, I think every nation should have to protect itself - same principle as of welfare - fighting FOR others makes them even weaker, and loses us fine, brave people.
The most prosperous states with out a deficit are harvesting natural resources. BTW they are Republican controlled states.
All you that think America should police the world and give foreign aid to other countries are living in denial of the trillions of debt. If every American were taxed 100% it's not enough for the interest!!!!
If you want to police the world, have war and continue foreign aid ...
YOU PAY FOR IT OUT OF YOUR OWN POCKET!