Should the RNC Obama chair be put in the Smithsonian because of its' historical significance?

by Simmering Frog Posted 2012/09/05 04:38:08

Related Topics: Obama, RNC, 2012

Read More

13 votes
Read all 22 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	7 votes	54%
	No	6 votes	46%

Add a comment above

wamcalif 2012/09/07 02:12:09

No

Lol..that's funny.

reply
voice_matters 2012/09/05 18:41:08

No

what does it represent? that a hollywood actor supports a republican. so what. he is not the first and not the last

reply
NarcolepticGoat 2012/09/05 16:00:56

No

I'm pro Obama and *I'm* sick of the chair nonsense.

reply
k8elou 2012/09/05 08:34:16

Yes

Lets fill up the museum with all sorts of random stuff :) A chair ? Why the hell not

reply
voice_m... to k8elou 2012/09/05 18:41:52

that is what museums are stuffed with. stuff that means something to someone who picks what stuff goes into their museum

reply
k8elou to voice_m... 2012/09/11 04:20:47

Exactly. I might make a museum one day then. Would be fun xD

reply
Justagirl 2012/09/05 05:49:55

Yes

Found the whole thing embarrassing and a mockery against the people fighting the contemptuous and deliberate actions the Obama administration has perpetrated against the Constitution. No laughing matter!

reply
Justagirl to Justagirl 2012/09/05 05:50:59

Meant to select NO!

reply
voice_m... to Justagirl 2012/09/05 18:42:49

what is a laughign matter is the fact that not a single lib has ever shown a nconsitution violation. are you able to be the first?

reply
Justagirl to voice_m... 2012/09/05 19:36:48

The deepwater ban on drilling, and after the ban was struck down in court, another was issued. The
administration stands in contempt of court for that one. Like another?

reply
voice_m... to Justagirl 2012/09/05 19:45:25

i would like one. i do notice how the link to that is missing. can you re-send the link please

reply
Justagirl to voice_m... 2012/09/05 20:03:19

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/n...

reply
voice_m... to Justagirl 2012/09/06 15:02:15

libby no wher did it sayh the actions were unconstitutional. really not a surprise seeing the government as i have already stated determines which public lands can be drilled

reply
Justagirl to voice_m... 2012/09/06 16:13:50

Hurled insults and abusive behavior fails to disguise ignorance. Executive power is limited to those not given to Congress, excluding but not limited to the regulation of commerce.

reply
voice_m... to Justagirl 2012/09/06 18:01:05

name the article and section of the constitution that is violated seeing your link failed at that as well

reply
Justagirl to voice_m... 2012/09/06 16:21:01

Another? Sending U.S. troops to Libya without a Declaration of War from Congress. This administration isn't the first to by pass and circumvent the Constitution, nor will it be the last so long as We are KEPT divided by party line politics, they have us exactly where they want us.

reply
voice_m... to Justagirl 2012/09/06 18:05:09
sjalan 2012/09/05 05:34:54

No

+1
Burnt, as the speech did nothing but go down in flames.

reply
sglmom 2012/09/05 05:12:09

Yes

Makes more sense than some other things I've seen included in museum collections lately ..

reply
DM Twin 2012/09/05 05:07:01

Yes

+1
Hell YES!!!!

reply
ElChorizon© 2012/09/05 05:00:27

Yes

+1
Hell yes! or at the very least it should receive the Nobel Peace Prize.

reply
Tee Quake 2012/09/05 04:46:25

No

+1
I have no idea what you're talking about, but as a general rule, the only thing that will ultimately be significant, historically, about Obama, is the fraud he perpetrated against the American people. That would go well in Ripley's Believe It or Not, but not the Smithsonian. Perhaps it could be auctioned off to Kenya or Indonesia and the money could be used to begin paying back the foolish, unwarranted trillions in additional debt that Obama managed to ring-up in just 4 years?

reply