Should the NATO meeting have been held in a low populated region to save taxpayer money, instead of in Chicago?
tncdel
2012/05/19 23:32:37
|
|
|||||
|
13 votes
|
|
81% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
19% | |||
See:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fighter-jets-soar-over-chicag...
Why not in Alaska, Montana or another area where logistics didn't require the added expenses of conducting surveillance and providing security?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fighter-jets-soar-over-chicag...
Why not in Alaska, Montana or another area where logistics didn't require the added expenses of conducting surveillance and providing security?
Sort By
- Selketskiss 2012/05/23 07:28:01 (edited)NO [explain why you think not].
Where else do you expect crooks, liars and thieves to be, in a town filled with corruption, crooks, liars and thieves....reply - Dee 2012/05/20 08:20:50YES [explain why you think so].+1There is going to be trouble. Some group can not let a chance like this go by without some silly demonstration. I just hope they will include a map in the attendees welcome packet of the areas to stay out of after 4 PM.reply
- TheTruth1313 2012/05/20 06:49:12YES [explain why you think so].+1But we already know that Obama knows nothing about saving money.reply
- mrdog 2012/05/20 06:47:04YES [explain why you think so].Pickle Gap, Arkansas is perfect location....barkreply
- wtw 2012/05/20 04:20:19YES [explain why you think so].The chicago businesses lost a lot of revenue!reply
- Freeranger 2012/05/20 04:03:06YES [explain why you think so].Why not the Mount Washington Hotel In Bretton Woods, N.H.? Ideal setting.
reply - beachbum 2012/05/20 02:11:29YES [explain why you think so].Save even more $ - teleconference.................reply
- Bali 2012/05/20 00:38:09YES [explain why you think so].Could have had it in Alaska.....security would have been a breeze and everyone could have had about the same flight time...give or take.reply
- srini 2012/05/20 00:20:43NO [explain why you think not].Actually, given that they invited a country which had no business being present (Pakistan--which would be akin to inviting Nazi Germany to a post-WW2 peace-conference), it shouldn't have been held!reply
- Bozette 2012/05/19 23:54:30YES [explain why you think so].Yes, but neither our government representatives nor anyone at the UN has a lick of common sense.reply
