
Should the GOP Repeal Obama's Health Care Reform Bill?
SodaHead News
November 02, 2010 15:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
188 votes
|
|
59% | |||
|
103 votes
|
|
32% | |||
|
29 votes
|
|
9% | |||
Do Republicans want to repeal ObamaCare? Is Christine O’Donnell not a witch? You betcha!
We won’t know until Wednesday (or perhaps later) what the makeup of the next Congress will be and whether the GOP will have enough votes to implement a priority outlined in the 2010 Republican Agenda to “repeal and replace the government takeover of health care.”
Even if they stage the kind of takeover that has been suggested, The Washington Post noted that it could be difficult “if not impossible” to actually repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Why? Even if they take both houses of Congress, they would, ironically, not have enough votes to counter a Democratic filibuster, not to mention a presidential veto, which any repeal would most certainly face.
In other words, like it or not, ObamaCare is here to stay.
What weapons can the GOP deploy against the plan? The Post reported that even if Republicans only gain one house of Congress, they will have some control over appropriations, which the health plan has in spades. With over 115 appropriations that are vital to implementing the plan, the GOP could block crucial parts of it, or even refuse to give the staff of the Department of Health and Human Services time to set up the law.
They can also stymie it by refusing to pass any appropriations that would fund the law, or any alternatives. If President Obama then refuses to sign any appropriations bill that doesn’t fund health care we could be headed for the same kind of government shutdown that occurred in 1994 when Republican leader Newt Gingrich and Democratic President Bill Clinton faced off in a budget battle.
The tricky part for Republicans is that even though the health care bill is unpopular overall, there are elements of it – such as no lifetime limits on coverage, no discriminating against children with preexisting conditions and coverage for dependents up to age 26 – that they admit are well liked. They don’t want to get rid of those, but trying to wipe out the bill without wiping out the bill will be very tricky.
Then again, maybe they’ll just stall until 2012, when they think they could take back the White House and have a much stronger veto pen.
Do you think Republicans should try to repeal health care?
We won’t know until Wednesday (or perhaps later) what the makeup of the next Congress will be and whether the GOP will have enough votes to implement a priority outlined in the 2010 Republican Agenda to “repeal and replace the government takeover of health care.”
Even if they stage the kind of takeover that has been suggested, The Washington Post noted that it could be difficult “if not impossible” to actually repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Why? Even if they take both houses of Congress, they would, ironically, not have enough votes to counter a Democratic filibuster, not to mention a presidential veto, which any repeal would most certainly face.
In other words, like it or not, ObamaCare is here to stay.
What weapons can the GOP deploy against the plan? The Post reported that even if Republicans only gain one house of Congress, they will have some control over appropriations, which the health plan has in spades. With over 115 appropriations that are vital to implementing the plan, the GOP could block crucial parts of it, or even refuse to give the staff of the Department of Health and Human Services time to set up the law.
They can also stymie it by refusing to pass any appropriations that would fund the law, or any alternatives. If President Obama then refuses to sign any appropriations bill that doesn’t fund health care we could be headed for the same kind of government shutdown that occurred in 1994 when Republican leader Newt Gingrich and Democratic President Bill Clinton faced off in a budget battle.
The tricky part for Republicans is that even though the health care bill is unpopular overall, there are elements of it – such as no lifetime limits on coverage, no discriminating against children with preexisting conditions and coverage for dependents up to age 26 – that they admit are well liked. They don’t want to get rid of those, but trying to wipe out the bill without wiping out the bill will be very tricky.
Then again, maybe they’ll just stall until 2012, when they think they could take back the White House and have a much stronger veto pen.
Do you think Republicans should try to repeal health care?
More polls by SodaHead News
Top Opinion
-
possiblymaybe November 03, 2010 04:47:18Yes+9Hell Yes! That bill is horrendous! If there is any money well spent it is repealing that piece of death right there. If you support it but have not read it, READ IT and read the stimulus too.

See Votes by State
Loading map...
News & Politics
May 26, 2012 03:14:52
Hot Questions on SodaHead
-
Who's the Hottest Male Actor Over 50?
-
What Was the Best Season Finale?
-
Who's the Meanest Reality TV Judge?
- View more slideshows »










not just the GOP, everyone will be involved, the bill as it stands needs to be repealed...IMO
BENEFIT EXCHANGES." Direct quote. The insures have divided the country into sections and have an oligarchy in place. This is what the GOP wants to remove. They may say "freemarkets" but what they really mean is our market. This is why they have fought so hard against this bill for this reason and no other. Open your minds and uderstand that money is the main motivating factor here;not your health or your future.
DAMN RIGHT
Look, if you wish to remain stupid, do so. Your deal not mine - but a quick look at the tax codes should tell you.
If I'm stupid then that must make you... brain dead :P
Also, if people with cancer wanted health insurance, they wouldn't have contracted a pre-existing condition in the first place. There is no cure for stupidity, right?
I am not sure if there is a cure for stupidity. I wish there were so people would read the bill and be able to understand it before judging it is a good thing for themselves or others. There are ways to help prevent stupidity. One way is to make informed decisions that are based on personal research.
God you are the epitome of the "Dumb American"... Saying "Also, if people with cancer wanted health insurance, they wouldn't have contracted a pre-existing condition in the first place. There is no cure for stupidity, right?" is ignorant! No one wants to get Cancer. Most is environmental and some is genetic. It's not like not wearing a rubber sleeping with someone who has AIDS... SHEESH !
as aretired person, I was told there would be disastrous changes for medicare recipients...just got my 2011 booklet..I see no changes in benefits...and this idea that government will make decisions for you is absurd....who makes them now??some dude in India who decides wether you can go to some specialist or not..etc...
Alpeaux
Stimulus [Full Text]
[PDF] Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
[PDF] Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
Some language will be changed, but that's about it.
I'm not saying you're wrong; but if you're right, I think we're in for quite a ride before reaching the point you describe.