Quantcast

Should the EPA be able to fine oil refiners for not using a non-existent bio fuel?

Steverno~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/23 06:27:49
The EPA is out of control because....
A clean energy future is important,no matter the costs because....
Other Thoughts!
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Cellulosic ethanol is not yet commercial, but according to the Institure for Energy Research, US politicians and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are not aware of that fact since they are mandating US refiners to blend it into petroleum products or pay a fine, the Institute declared last week.

Refiners will be required to pay about $6.8 million in penalties for not blending enough cellulosic ethanol into gasoline in 2011. Even though cellulosic producers did not sell a single gallon of cellulosic ethanol commercially in 2010 and it is not clear if they sold any cellulosic ethanol in 2011, EPA has mandated that refiners blend even more cellulosic ethanol in 2012.

EPA now requires refiners to blend 8.65 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol or pay EPA millions of dollars in fines. The current system rewards EPA for picking an unrealistic number so that EPA can increase the fines it receives. It also means that consumers will be paying higher gasoline prices.

Cellulosic ethanol is ethanol made out of biomass such as wood chips, corn cobs, or so-called energy crops such as switch grass and poplar. Cellulosic ethanol from wood was first produced in Germany in 1898. The Germans developed an industrial process that was also used in two commercial plants in the southeast United States during World War I. The plants closed shortly after World War I due to a drop in lumber production.

During World War II, the United States again turned to cellulosic ethanol, but because the technology was still not profitable, the plant closed after the war. Construction of pilot scale cellulosic ethanol plants requires considerable financial support through government grants and subsidies.

When Congress created the cellulosic ethanol mandate, they assigned EPA the task of determining a new mandate each year, if cellulosic producers do not produce the mandated level. Although the agency provides a much lower mandate than what Congress hoped for, EPA’s mandate is far higher than the amount available from pilot plants and higher than the amount suggested by the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The penalties for not blending the prescribed EPA amount are eventually paid by consumers at the pump.

Evolution of Cellulosic Ethanol Mandates

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) contains a renewable fuel standard that mandates the production of ethanol to the level of 36 billion gallons by 2022, where 15 billion gallons is to be corn-based and the remainder is to come from advanced forms of biofuels, including cellulosic ethanol.

The advanced biofuel contribution starts at 0.6 billion gallons in 2009 increasing to 1.35 billion gallons in 2011, 2.0 billion gallons in 2012 and eventually to 21.0 billion gallons in 2022. Because cellulosic ethanol was not yet commercial, EPA issued changes to the original act that requires four separate standards including 1.0 billion gallons of biomass-based diesel by 2012 and 16 billion gallons of cellulosic biofuels by 2022, subject to annual assessments that EPA will set each November for the following year.

The original legislation set the goal for motor fuel from cellulose at 250 million gallons for 2011 and 500 million gallons for 2012. EPA lowered those figures to 6.6 million gallons for 2011 and 8.65 million gallons for 2012, just a small fraction of the original numbers (about 2 per cent), but an incredibly large amount when the cellulosic biofuel does not exist commercially.

Should the EPA be able to fine oil refiners for not using a non existent bio fuel

The Clean Air Act requires the EIA to provide EPA each October with an estimate of the amount of transportation fuel, biomass-based diesel and cellulosic biofuel projected to be available in the following calendar year. EIA’s estimate for 2012 for cellulosic biofuel production is 6.9 million gallons, 20 per cent lower than the EPA requirement established for 2012.[iii] To see that even EIA’s lower estimate is high, for 2011, EIA predicted cellulosic biofuel production to be 3.94 million gallons, but “actual sales, if any, are expected to fall well below the estimate” according to the agency.

The State of Cellulosic Ethanol Producers

One reason the mandates cannot be met is that the companies that were expected to produce cellulosic ethanol and that received the first round of subsidies from the government did not make it commercially. About 70 per cent of the cellulosic ethanol mandated for 2010 (about 70 million gallons) was expected to come from Alabama-based Cello Energy. However, that projection was made before Cello Energy had built the cellulosic ethanol plant and before the technology was proven to work. In 2009, a jury ruled that Cello Energy lied about how much cellulosic biofuel it could produce and in October 2010, the firm declared bankruptcy.

A 2011 report by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) concluded that “currently, no commercially viable bio-refineries exist for converting cellulosic biomass to fuel.” The reason, according to the NAS, is because of “the high cost of producing cellulosic biofuels compared with petroleum-based fuels, and uncertainties in future biofuel markets.” According to NAS, even the 2022 target will not be met “unless innovative technologies are developed that unexpectedly improve the cellulosic biofuels production process.” The report also concludes that the renewable fuel standard “may be an ineffective policy for reducing global greenhouse gas emissions,” since the full life cycle of the fuel, including its transport, could result in higher emissions than conventional petroleum.

The federal government under Presidents Bush and Obama has poured at least $1.5 billion of grants and loan subsidies to potential cellulosic producers. Recently, in August 2011, the Obama Administration funded a $510 million program in partnership with the Navy to produce advanced biofuels for the military. In September 2011, the federal government loaned $134 million to Abengoa Bioenergy to build a cellulosic plant in Kansas and the Department of Energy provided POET, which advertises itself as the “world’s largest ethanol producer,” a $105 million loan guarantee for cellulosic biofuels.

Refiners Must Pay Penalties

Refiners have to purchase waiver credits for failing to comply with the mandate to purchase cellulosic biofuel that does not exist commercially. For 2011, the cost is estimated at $6.8 million, but the amount will not be determined until refiners close their books in February. According to Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, the credits cost about $1.20 per gallon.[vii] These costs are passed onto consumers of gasoline and diesel fuel, so the renewable fuels mandate becomes an invisible tax paid at the gas pump. It is just another way for the federal government to tax consumers, and in this case without most of them suspecting it.

Conclusion

Congress subsidized a product (cellulosic biofuel) and mandates its use although that product does not exist and is punishing oil companies for not purchasing the nonexistent product. And the federal government is still subsidizing the industry in the hope that someday it might exist. All along, consumers and taxpayers are paying for the debacle whether at the pump and/or in subsidies and loan guarantees.

From: thebioenergysite.com

Read More: http://www.thebioenergysite.com/articles/1122/do-r...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Steverno~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/23 06:31:56
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Steverno~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +17
    This is a perfect example of what's wrong with the EPA.The fines are passed off in a higher price of gasoline to the American consumer.And another hidden tax for more money to Washington!

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ☆Ed☆ Murph 65 2012/06/24 11:41:46
    ☆Ed☆
    +3
    I believe that once the EPA employee has undergone their full liberal lobotomy that they're allowed to meander around unharnessed.
  • Murph 65 ☆Ed☆ 2012/06/24 14:37:15
    Murph 65
    +2
    Maybe we need to try more sitting in their chairs and less meandering. Apparently when they meander, we, the voting public, are in danger of their dumb, crazy, "see only with a liberal eye" musings. Lock 'em up, sit 'em down, and tell them to leave well enough alone.
  • ☆Ed☆ Murph 65 2012/06/25 01:44:55
    ☆Ed☆
    +2
    Yes indeed!!! The national credo should be; "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!!!"
  • Murph 65 ☆Ed☆ 2012/06/26 13:10:57
    Murph 65
    +2
    It's amazing how many things that little credo works for, isn't it?
  • ☆Ed☆ Murph 65 2012/06/26 17:02:43
    ☆Ed☆
    +2
    Yes indeed!!!
  • Charles E 2012/06/23 21:39:16
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Charles E
    +8
    Penalizing a company for not using a non existant product is so dumb words fail me.

    The only solution is to disolve the EPA and start over. With a rule that anyone who ever worked for the EPA at a level above janitor may not work for the new agency.
  • Michaelene Charles E 2012/06/25 02:55:36
    Michaelene
    +2
    I agree, clean house all over the government is what we need to do. At every level, local state and fed.
  • OnlyAPilgrim 2012/06/23 21:19:09
    The EPA is out of control because....
    OnlyAPilgrim
    +7
    they are hurting America.
  • jubil8 BN-0 PON 2012/06/23 21:09:46
    Other Thoughts!
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +2
    Now that's what I call creative financing. :)
  • baboula 2012/06/23 21:06:07
    Other Thoughts!
    baboula
    +3
    The EPA doesn't know what it is doing....imagine that...just get rid of the whole thing and save this country some money
  • Ron 2012/06/23 20:23:19
    Other Thoughts!
    Ron
    +2
    The EPA needs to be closed along with a lot more useless departments.
  • Ken 2012/06/23 20:10:49
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Ken
    +5
    The EPA is completely out of control.
  • Callaway 2012/06/23 19:14:29
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Callaway
    +3
    EPA is out of control because it's being used as a political tool to advance an agenda.
  • olylift 2012/06/23 19:07:52
    The EPA is out of control because....
    olylift
    +2
    We haven't shot them yet.
  • Soup Man 2012/06/23 19:02:21
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Soup Man
    (.)
  • Charge 2012/06/23 18:57:57 (edited)
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Charge
    +5
    I hear the Twilight Zone theme.... wow!

    obama hypnotism
  • Marianne 2012/06/23 18:38:58
    Other Thoughts!
    Marianne
    +1
    I would rather opt for ecologically bearable solutions, but I think that also polluters should be given a chance to become ecologic. And I think that progress and adequate measures are very urgent. Still, there is too little information available and much rumour.
    I am wondering why cellulosic ethanol is not commercial yet. I heard about a few projects and tests regarding biogas or biofuel, respectively (mostly basing on green waste or plants), which take place in different parts of the world, but actions seem isolated. Furthermore, certain projects are focusing on hydrogen.
  • ☆Ed☆ Marianne 2012/06/24 11:50:02
    ☆Ed☆
    +1
    The main problem I have with your statement, "I would rather opt for ecologically bearable solutions", is that, so far, there haven't been ANY "ecologically bearable solutions" to actually use. An excellent example of these ecological solutions has been the algae biofuel FIASCO run by the U.S. Navy that is producing biofuel from algae at a cost to the American taxpayers of $400+ per gallon!!!
  • Marianne ☆Ed☆ 2012/06/24 12:34:36
    Marianne
    +2
    I did not hear about the fiasco with the algae biofuel. Many projects are running in the diversest sectors, and results are not always good at the first time. Not all the ecological processes or products are cost-effective yet, while others, in the test phase, show encouraging results, also partly with biogas. But the great industries were not following up and research institutions had great difficulties in getting funds. After all, many new alternative, renewable energy and/or energy saving technologies are still in development or in the test phase. Research tends to improve and miniaturise existing technology. There might be a future with hydrogen cars, for instance. Solar energy is already efficient in the building sector. Hydraulic energy exists since long, and in Europe, many trains, trolleys, trams and subways or undergrounds in the public transport sector are electrified and rather cost efficient. And remember, fossile energies might be used up sooner than expected. We must drive toward diversification and sustainability.
  • ☆Ed☆ Marianne 2012/06/24 13:53:16
    ☆Ed☆
    +3
    As for fossil fuels being used up any time soon, I don't believe that anymore than I believe the global cooling, global warming, or global climate change scams that are simply designed to STEAL our money!!!

    While I most certainly AGREE that we desperately need to develop VIABLE renewable energy, debacles like the algae biofuel costs need to be dropped like hot potatoes in favor of other programs!!!

    Here in Arkansas we have a biofuel program going through MFA Oil that is using a particular grass (Miscanthus giganteus) that is certainly looking very promising!!!
    http://www.mfaoil.com/index.c...
  • Marianne ☆Ed☆ 2012/06/24 14:45:00
    Marianne
    +2
    How interesting, Miscanthus giganteus, actually a hybrid with low nutritive requirements (and it is non-invasive), is also currently used in the EU as a commercial energy crop, as a ressource for heat and electricity, and of course for biofuel products. There is indeed a future for these productions - a very good point! And research is going on in many different sectors. Usually, programmes leading to debacles are dropped when no satisfactory solution is found. Surprising that some last so long, while promising ones are abandoned ...
    As to the climatic problems, pollution and the rarefaction of resources, I am afraid that it is true, although there will always be frauds and lies from diverse sides, simply to make money. I am thinking, for instance, of the well visible desertification of many overcultured, overexploited regions, deforestation in many parts of the world and of the increasing pollution of soil, air and water. And you certainly heard about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, due to our wasting society. There are so many elements telling us that respect for our environment and sustainability are urgent worldwide to save our wonderful planet.
    I am keeping my fingers crossed, hoping that they will create an energy, cost and environmentally efficient win-win situation.
  • ☆Ed☆ Marianne 2012/06/25 01:51:06
    ☆Ed☆
    +1
    I completely agree with you, although my cynicism of ALL governments makes me believe that the ONLY environmental "win-win" scenario that I'll live to see will only take place IF the day ever comes that a politician can overcome their own greed.
  • No nonsense NanC...don't BS... 2012/06/23 18:31:14
    The EPA is out of control because....
    No nonsense NanC...don't BS me!
    +5
    This only shows how out of touch the 0bama administration is..........and
    how stoooooooopid both he, his Department of Energy and the EPA are.
  • Moonage 2012/06/23 17:53:09
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Moonage
    +3
    I don't think they thought this out too well.
  • WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/23 17:52:32
    The EPA is out of control because....
    WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA
    +4
    It sucks and it is destroying business...get rid of that ridiculous agency and get some sanity!
  • Walt 2012/06/23 17:46:54
    Other Thoughts!
    Walt
    +2
    Whenever companies get fined by the EPA, it's no skin off the company's nose; they pass the costs on to the consumer.

    The EPA recklessly fining petro-chemical companies this way delivers an impact to each and every one of us at the gas pump.
  • Diane Spraggs Yates 2012/06/23 16:37:51
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Diane Spraggs Yates
    +6
    It has too much power and non elected people running it !!!!!
  • DrDelos 2012/06/23 16:36:56
    The EPA is out of control because....
    DrDelos
    +6
    The EPA has been kidnapped slowly and surely over the years and is being run and controlled by eco-terrorists and Luddites. Their essential precepts are: Man is the enemy, any progress is bad, only a tiny elite of Poindexters like themselves can possibly understand the environment and they need more power to control more aspects of life on Earth. The public is beginning to understand this because they are overstepping their bounds more quickly than the public can be brainwashed that they are *good* and *needed* by society and I am predicting/hoping that future administrations will trim them back and curb their future power grabs. Global Warming/AGW is going to be their undoing.
  • mrk5panzer 2012/06/23 16:19:27
    The EPA is out of control because....
    mrk5panzer
    +5
    They smoke there own home grown and you know what happens when ya smoke your own!
    trippin
  • Kane Fernau 2012/06/23 16:08:27
    Other Thoughts!
    Kane Fernau
    +5
    In 2008 oil reached $145 /bbl. gas barely got above $4.00/gallon, Today oil is under $80/bbl. average cost nationwide is $3.40/gallon. Obama is costing every person in this country with his green regulations.
  • TruBluTopaz 2012/06/23 16:06:37
    The EPA is out of control because....
    TruBluTopaz
    +7
    They are an agency that can impose penalties without any sort of law in place. It's a rogue agency.
  • Tasine 2012/06/23 16:06:26
    Other Thoughts!
    Tasine
    +3
    It's time to defund the EPA, put it out to pasture, and get real. The nuts at the EPA have to SEARCH for something to regulate. They've outlived their usefulness.
  • frank 2012/06/23 16:00:58
    The EPA is out of control because....
    frank
    +6
    Only the Idiot's from the EPA could come up with a fine like this.
  • mk, Smartass Oracle 2012/06/23 16:00:26
    The EPA is out of control because....
    mk, Smartass Oracle
    +6
    They're Communist controlled




    Communist EPA
  • shadow76 2012/06/23 15:55:36
    The EPA is out of control because....
    shadow76
    +6
    The EPA should be shut down! It is contiuously over stepping it's bounds! It is a violation of The Constitution.
  • Peewee 2012/06/23 15:35:03
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Peewee
    +4
    NO...and the technology is not there for a viable electric car alternative or decent solar. Work on solutions, but to force what isn't there yet is just silly. The EPA is way out of control.
  • Kiosk Kid 2012/06/23 15:25:30
    The EPA is out of control because....
    Kiosk Kid
    +4
    What would we do without big government?
  • Tasine Kiosk Kid 2012/06/23 16:07:49
    Tasine
    +5
    Live free!!!!!!
  • j2 2012/06/23 14:16:57 (edited)
    The EPA is out of control because....
    j2
    +7
    This administration is long on politics and short on sense. Does anyone think that the administration is unaware they've created an impossible goal for industry? It's just a veiled tax with the added "benefit" that they can lump the fines into their political statements about how bad the industry is about following regulations.



    I'm aware of a case where a young political science graduate is fumbling her job to manage a geothermal project. She's basically shut it down because she doesn't know enough science to make a decision and refuses to approve anything she doesn't understand.
  • paul 2012/06/23 13:00:35

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 06:45:46

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals