Should Ron Paul's Delegates Be Seated at the RNC?

by sodabox Posted 2012/08/26 13:25:22

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	59 votes	83%
	No	7 votes	10%
	Wait	5 votes	7%

More polls by sodabox

T-dub 2012/10/19 23:08:27

Yes

Should have been, but were shafted at any and every possible spot...at the county, state, and national levels.

reply
Bronar 2012/08/30 16:35:53

Yes

+1
Of course, he won them, unless they are going to be completely disruptive asswipes, then throw them out like you would anybody.

reply
NOT14U2 2012/08/27 15:23:29

Yes

+1
The RNC is so full of straw-men , I believe they want Obama to win

reply
James 2012/08/27 14:26:24
rspell 2012/08/27 12:23:13

Yes

+4
The RNC is being run by criminals, thieves, liars and thoroughly despicable people...just like the DNC.

reply
Che Guevara - Hero 2012/08/27 07:23:01

No

+1
White Supremacist and Homophobe Ron paul is a DOUCHE !

Ron Paul voted AGAINST the MLK Holiday.

Ron Paul voted AGAINST awarding Rosa Parks the Congressional Medal of Freedom.

Ron Paul said he would have voted AGAINST the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Paul has a 30 year history of pandering to the KKK and White Power Movement.

You can make all the LAME excuses for White Supremacist Ron Paul you want. His actions speak louder than words

-FACT: Ron Paul's presidential campaign issued a flyer that boasted about the candidate's efforts to introduce legislation that would remove challenges to the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act from the federal court system.
http://www.joemygod.blogspot....

-FACT: Ron Paul's Iowa state director is Mike Heath, a long-term Christian-right activist who formerly served as the board chairman of an SPLC-certified anti-gay hate group known as "Americans for Truth About Homosexuality."
http://thenewcivilrightsmovem...

-FACT: Ron Paul has a long history of racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments.
http://www.tnr.com/article/po...

-FACT: As state above, Ron Paul supports the so-called "states' rights" approach to marriage, but interestingly, only for LGBT couples.
http://www.yourtango.com/2008...

-FACT: Ron Paul said, "If I were in Congress in 1996, I wou...

White Supremacist and Homophobe Ron paul is a DOUCHE !

Ron Paul voted AGAINST the MLK Holiday.

Ron Paul voted AGAINST awarding Rosa Parks the Congressional Medal of Freedom.

Ron Paul said he would have voted AGAINST the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Paul has a 30 year history of pandering to the KKK and White Power Movement.

You can make all the LAME excuses for White Supremacist Ron Paul you want. His actions speak louder than words

-FACT: Ron Paul's presidential campaign issued a flyer that boasted about the candidate's efforts to introduce legislation that would remove challenges to the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act from the federal court system.
http://www.joemygod.blogspot....

-FACT: Ron Paul's Iowa state director is Mike Heath, a long-term Christian-right activist who formerly served as the board chairman of an SPLC-certified anti-gay hate group known as "Americans for Truth About Homosexuality."
http://thenewcivilrightsmovem...

-FACT: Ron Paul has a long history of racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments.
http://www.tnr.com/article/po...

-FACT: As state above, Ron Paul supports the so-called "states' rights" approach to marriage, but interestingly, only for LGBT couples.
http://www.yourtango.com/2008...

-FACT: Ron Paul said, "If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress' constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a same-sex marriage license issued in another state."
http://www.thepoliticalguide....

-FACT: Ron Paul opposes the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would prohibit discrimination against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity by civilian, nonreligious employers.
http://www.salon.com/2007/09/...
(more)

reply
santa6642 2012/08/27 00:52:45

Yes

out side

reply
David 2012/08/26 21:22:02

Yes

+2
Of course!

reply
Næthan Æterna 2012/08/26 19:43:36

Yes

+4
What harm could possibly come from letting the legitimately, legally elected Delegates participate in the RNC? Is Mitt Romney afraid that he might possibly lose? If he's got it so in the bag, what is the hold up?

reply
Dan ☮ R... to Næthan ... 2012/08/26 21:27:01 (edited)

+3
Either he fears losing or the GOP is desperate to create the illusion of unity in the GOP, when in reality there was a great divide.
It is just a dog and pony show after all, and they want to follow their script.

reply
Ambassador II 2012/08/26 19:40:18

Yes

+1
Put them right up there with the delegates of women' rights, SS beneficiaries, those working as Walmart greeters after being pillaged by Reagan Banks of their retirement savings, nursing home patients, teenagers carrying unwanted babies, rape victims, and
those living downwind from an industrial smokestack burning soft coal. Let them all cheer at the same time when Romney tells of his "business experience" of selling companies to China and outsourcing jobs to India for huge profits. Let the fun begin.

reply
luvguins 2012/08/26 18:33:32

Yes

+2
Lets get ready to rumble! They have time now that the roll call has been postponed from Monday until Thursday.

reply
Tuna 2012/08/26 17:40:57

Yes

+4
RP may have MORE delegates than Romney; the fat lady hasn't sung yet.

reply
Embalmer 2012/08/26 17:05:49

Yes

+3
The RNC is a hateful, spiteful and confused organization. Under Rancid Penis it's become a radical extremist hate group, nothing like it was under Micheal Steele.

reply
CAPISCE to Embalmer 2012/08/26 17:16:36

+1
Ron Paul just partially endorsed Mitt Romney

reply
Embalmer to CAPISCE 2012/08/26 17:19:50

And? That does not change my opinion of the RNC.

reply
Dan ☮ R... to CAPISCE 2012/08/26 20:47:21

+2
No he didnt. He simply stated that he must refuse a speaking role at the RNC because he cant meet the conditions given to him, which were to fully endorse Romney and have his speech vetted.

reply
CAPISCE to Dan ☮ R... 2012/08/26 20:48:33

"I can not fully endorse Mitt Romney" Ron Paul

reply
Dan ☮ R... to CAPISCE 2012/08/26 21:21:54

+2
He was stating he refused to speak because he cannot fully endorse him.Even out of context does not mean he "partially" endorses him.

reply
CAPISCE to Dan ☮ R... 2012/08/26 21:22:56

If you say so

reply
brian.southworth.921 2012/08/26 16:34:12

Wait

+4
Abandon the GOP and form third party. I bet they'll get the national platform faster than the Green Party. Repubs and Dems are bought out by the big guys. Both passed a bailout without any oversight. After 40 years of living i am sick of them both.

reply
American 2012/08/26 15:57:25
James to American 2012/08/27 14:28:52

+3
Oh don't worry....we will...

reply
Windy to American 2012/08/28 16:45:57

+1
Yes, place that protest vote for Gary Johnson who is, admittedly, only 2nd best to Ron Paul, but who is better than ALL the rest put together and is far more likely to win with our votes than Virgil Goode or any other "3rd party" candidate..

reply
Huntclan 2012/08/26 15:53:47

Yes

+5
They are corrupt thugs.

reply
swim2bgood 2012/08/26 15:49:50

Yes

+7
He won them according to their rules but when the rules didn't work for the establishment they had to be changed.

reply
Seonag 2012/08/26 15:29:42

Yes

+6
Though I did not vote for Ron Paul, he won his delegates and they should be seated!

reply
Deep007 2012/08/26 15:19:50

No

+2
Freaking Liberal Lite Whack Jobs

reply
sodabox to Deep007 2012/08/27 01:03:13

+1
Don't like playing by your own rules do you?

reply
Deep007 to sodabox 2012/08/27 07:37:23

my RULES???
Ron Paul is a dupe
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

and so are YOU

reply
James to Deep007 2012/08/27 14:32:04

+1
Better to be a classic liberal than a closet liberal.....

reply
Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/08/26 15:18:28 (edited)

Yes

+8
He won them fair and square according to the GOP rules, and the last time I checked it would be a violation of the US Code to prevent them from voting or coercing them to vote for anyone.

But we all know they wont seat them without a fight. The RNC already ousted delegates, forced delegates to sign affidavits (meaning they are guilty of perjury for not voting for Romney), and just flat out violating their own rules and procedures.

reply
Denny 2012/08/26 15:14:57

Yes

+2
Why not. Let them march around for about 15 minutes and be done with it. Then get on with the main show.

reply
DefendnProtect 2012/08/26 14:49:10

Yes

+4
If you're supporting the Washington/Wall Street organized crime network instead of We the People, then yes chosen Liberty delegates should be excluded or rounded up.

Jewish Gestapo. Spying on you and getting his Mossad fellows involved in 911 out of prison.

reply
Wayne 2012/08/26 14:44:47

Yes

+1
Any delegates voting for Romney and Ryan should be invited and accepted graciously.

reply
Arel 2012/08/26 14:39:22

Yes

+2
You Betcha!

reply
Warren - Novus Ordo Seclorum 2012/08/26 14:18:50

Wait

They should leave the GOP and back Gary Johnson.

reply
rspell to Warren ... 2012/08/27 12:26:32

+1
Yep

reply
Boblawbla 2012/08/26 14:15:28

Yes

+4
Absolutely!

reply
U-Dog 2012/08/26 14:07:35

Yes

+5
Yes, if the last shred of moral or intellectual integrity still matters to the GOP goon leaders.

reply