Should our tax dollars have to fund Planned Parenthood's genocide?

by ☆ElenaDiamond☆ Posted 2012/07/21 16:01:59

Related Topics: Planned Parenthood, Abortion, Weed, Racist, Website, Population, Devout, America, Abortions, Dollar, Tax Dollars, Clinics, Decline, Clinic

Read More

26 votes
Read all 54 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes it should. Here is why:	5 votes	19%
	No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.	21 votes	81%

Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in America. 78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. Are we being targeted? Isn't that genocide? We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population. If the current trend continues, by 2038 the black vote will be insignificant. Did you know that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a devout racist who created the Negro Project designed to sterilize unknowing black women and others she deemed as undesirables of society? The founder of Planned Parenthood said, "Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated." Is her vision being fulfilled today?

Taken from the website. http://www.blackgenocide.org/planned.html

Watch this shocking video as Planned Parenthood accepts donations that specifically target black babies. They say , " you can specifically request that the money be spent for a minority abortion"

Add a comment above

Htcbm1 2012/07/21 17:17:41 (edited)

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+4
I believe that the majority of americans believe in life, even that of the unborn it's that they have been de-sensitized an call it the womans right to choose. And I can't believe that they would rather kill their child rather than to giving the gift of life and letting a couple adopt....."They say they care, but they kill thier own", It makes no sense...And my tax dollars are paying for this genocide which pisses me off.
>> See Replies

More polls by ☆ElenaDiamond☆

MarinerFH 2012/07/23 02:29:58

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

Planned Parenthood is evil incarnate

reply
les_gvt 2012/07/22 18:06:25

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

Maybe it is in the ' provide Healthcare" clause of the Constitution that I seem to be missing

reply
conservyT 2012/07/22 17:54:25

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+1
There should be a Petition to end Censorship on YOUTUBE of all places!

This is RIDICULOUS!!!

ABORTION does have a purpose which isn’t towards a "Women’s Right" to her body, but rather an end to “substandard” Human Life!!!

reply
boss hawg 2012/07/21 21:47:01

Yes it should. Here is why:

might as well , kill here, kill in afghanistan, kill everywhere

reply
Gordon 2012/07/21 20:35:15

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+1
I am pro-life.

reply
Freeranger 2012/07/21 19:19:35

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+2
Nope, Never

reply
jackolantyrn356 2012/07/21 17:57:38

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+2
1961

reply
none 2012/07/21 17:47:46

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+3
Let them fund themselves with donations not with my tax dollars.

reply
Gordon to none 2012/07/21 20:36:34

+2
That makes too much sense for the entitlement types to figure out.

reply
none to Gordon 2012/07/21 20:51:01

+1
It doesn't have to make sense to the gimme' everything for nothing' types as long as they get their handouts.

reply
Gordon to none 2012/07/22 01:21:24

+1
That is the sad truth. They tend to be a greedy, selfish, unthankful bunch.

reply
les_gvt to none 2012/07/22 18:10:07

+1
you really expect Streisand, Clooney, Di Crapo, Boxer, Schumer et al to part with their money for something Joe six pack wouldn't pay for willingly?

reply
none to les_gvt 2012/07/22 18:12:02

+1
No not them, those liberal fools would be practicing hypocrisy if they did that. They want the over bearing, ever growing, entitlement government to cover it.

reply
Waldorf 2012/07/21 17:18:56

Yes it should. Here is why:

It is a good cause.

reply
☆ElenaD... to Waldorf 2012/07/21 17:57:57

+2
Genocide a good cause?

reply
Waldorf to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/21 20:42:20

If they are black children who don't have a parent that wants them, absolutely yes.

reply
☆ElenaD... to Waldorf 2012/07/21 21:04:36

Sick.

reply
Waldorf to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/21 21:05:52 (edited)

You asked the question but then want to call any opinion other than yours "sick". Spare us. Abortion questions on Sodahead are a dime a dozen.

reply
☆ElenaD... to Waldorf 2012/07/21 21:10:38

I don't care. It is an issue I care about. And yes, I am entitled to an opinion of your opinion.

reply
Waldorf to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/21 21:13:47

Well, then you are ambushing people who choose to answer your question with an opinion you don't like. Your question should be a statement rather than a question, challenging anyone to disagree.

reply
☆ElenaD... to Waldorf 2012/07/21 21:39:23

LOL then should only answer polls where you will remain unchallenged.

Might I suggest

Whats your favorite color
Do you eat breakfast for dinner
Do you like oreos...

Etc.

reply
Waldorf to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/21 22:51:05

I referred to you as the one to be unchallenged.

reply
☆ElenaD... to Waldorf 2012/07/21 23:23:26

I don't mInd at all. Why do you?

reply
Waldorf to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/21 23:47:49 (edited)

Of course you mind. That 's why you call people "sick" who see things differently.

I mind because it is a lack of integrity on your part. You aren't the first person to post a question and then act like a meat grinder for every reply. You train people to avoid your questions or to at least understand that your questions are not honest inquiries but actually rhetorical or simply statements in disguise.

reply
☆ElenaD... to Waldorf 2012/07/22 02:06:03

No, I don't mind. I rather enjoy giving people my opinion. If you don't like it why do you come to an opinion site?

reply
Waldorf to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/22 13:04:37

I could ask you why you post questions on an opinion site and then post a question with only one acceptable viewpoint, harassing any other and calling people sick.

reply
Htcbm1 2012/07/21 17:17:41 (edited)

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+4
I believe that the majority of americans believe in life, even that of the unborn it's that they have been de-sensitized an call it the womans right to choose. And I can't believe that they would rather kill their child rather than to giving the gift of life and letting a couple adopt....."They say they care, but they kill thier own", It makes no sense...And my tax dollars are paying for this genocide which pisses me off.

reply
Idiot repubs 2012/07/21 16:47:48

Yes it should. Here is why:

Should our tax dollars have to fund the US Military's genocide?

reply
☆ElenaD... to Idiot r... 2012/07/21 17:58:29

+2
How do babies threaten people?

They don't eve fight back. In war they do fight back.

reply
Idiot r... to ☆ElenaD... 2012/07/21 20:37:33 (edited)

If the GOp wasn't anti birth control, you wouldn't need as many abortions. period.

reply
Htcbm1 to Idiot r... 2012/07/21 21:05:06

+1
Where have you ever got the notion that the GOP was anti birth control ? "I'll tell you the Democrat party thats who" ! Along with there many various lies that you are more than willing to swallow...Your view is total B.S.

reply
Idiot r... to Htcbm1 2012/07/21 21:59:29

reply
Htcbm1 to Idiot r... 2012/07/21 22:39:03

+1
You made a blanket statement as if it were all the GOP not so, and there are those who do disagree with Rick Santorum, but to conclude that "all GOP" is nothing short of a lie...

reply
Idiot r... to Htcbm1 2012/07/22 00:49:22

reply
Htcbm1 to Idiot r... 2012/07/22 02:05:34

Its really funny how the left makes a big deal out of something that just isn't so...The tactics to make a lie the truth...

reply
Idiot r... to Htcbm1 2012/07/22 05:24:08

That means you are wrong.

reply
Htcbm1 to Idiot r... 2012/07/22 11:59:41

"What"?.......Go back to sleep in your dream world, there is no reasoning with you!!!...

reply
Rebel Yell 2012/07/21 16:44:13

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+1
The Hyde Amendment prevents tax payer money being used for abortions. Zealots always say PP is running numerous abortion mills although no audits have proved that. It makes for a great talking point and conservatives love social issues.

The irony is conservatives want to stop abortions from happening and at the same time they want to cut programs like W.I.C. and HeadStart that ensure an unplanned child is cared for. So the messsage is, have those babies but we want nothing to do with the needy minority children. One Republican advised those women should stick an aspirin between their legs. (hahahaha... such comics)

Most of what PP provides are preventive services. But no matter, the zealots need something to rag on. That crazy wild eyed hag Bachmann even went as far as to say PP builds clinics near Star Bucks to " lure women in". Sure thing, Nut Case, poor women hang out at Star Bucks all day long then they meander over for an abortion. Sheesh !

reply
John Hall 2012/07/21 16:18:39

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+1
If a woman wants or needs an abotion for birth control let her pay for it . On rape and incest there should be help .

reply
Reichstolz 2012/07/21 16:09:42 (edited)

No it shouldn't. The why is obvious.

+1
Why do you think the dependency party fights so hard to keep killing out of selfishness legal? If they didn't the blacks would've been a voting block that would have overtaken whites in the late 80's. Unfortunately, for the dependency party, their new favorite minority, is overwhelmingly catholic, and they are breeding in numbers that will be hard to control. Unless the dependency party can destroy that family unit, they will not remain under their control for long.

reply