Should Obama be impeached for helping Syrian rebels without approval of congress?

by sharkhead Posted 2012/08/03 18:57:09

Related Topics: Obama, Congress, Syrian Rebels, Impeached

Read More

48 votes
Read all 48 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	25 votes	52%
	No	23 votes	48%

Add a comment above

Outta' Here. 2012/08/03 18:59:08

Yes

+5
Among other things, yes.
>> See Replies

More polls by sharkhead

Brandon 2012/08/09 06:33:04

Yes

Along with everything else.

reply
Tony 2012/08/05 14:49:46

Yes

Wasn't this ability one of the powers granted to him by the National Defense Authorization Act

reply
john Kills 2012/08/05 04:09:00

No

After everything else he's done to our country in the last 4 years you want to impeach him now over this? Sure, ok. Good luck getting congress to act.

reply
sjalan 2012/08/04 22:39:29

No

If Ronald Reagan could avoid impeachment for helping the Contra's in that affair without Congress, this with Obama is NO DIFFERENT

reply
Danielle 2012/08/04 16:56:11

Yes

Because ANYTHING any president does without regard to our laws makes him a tyrant and therefore impeachable.

reply
ģhøṡτ øώl 2012/08/04 13:24:57

No

Let us not be hypocritical. Bush did a lot of things without congress' approval.

reply
Drummerboy to ģhøṡτ øώl 2012/08/04 18:10:11
ģhøṡτ øώl to Drummerboy 2012/08/05 13:30:56

Yeah, I understand that. And I have a very intricate disdain for the Marxist and his team totalitarian thinkers. However, I don't think this notion has enough merit to hold the water it needs to. Moot point. Especially in comparison.

reply
Drummerboy to ģhøṡτ øώl 2012/08/05 13:48:39
ģhøṡτ øώl to Drummerboy 2012/08/05 13:52:32

I agree with a lot of that. Especially the Fast and Furious stuff. He should be impeached FOR THAT. But the question was: "Should Obama be impeached for helping Syrian rebels without approval of congress?" Not, "Should Obama be impeached for ALL the horrible things he has done to this country?"

(Also, 86% of all news coverage on Mitt Romney is negative. Damn the lying, slimy Media in this country. And I'm not even that big of a fan of Romney. He was my LAST choice.)

reply
Drummerboy to ģhøṡτ øώl 2012/08/05 15:36:21
ģhøṡτ øώl to Drummerboy 2012/08/06 12:39:30

+1
True. There is much to be done on all fronts. Yet nothing is getting done.

reply
Drummerboy to ģhøṡτ øώl 2012/08/06 14:02:25
Jackal 2012/08/04 10:18:35

No

Congress is not a part of the chain of command. Only the President.

reply
Katherine 2012/08/04 09:34:28

Yes

+1
He must be guilty of at least half a dozen acts of treason.
If the first didn't matter, why would impeachment now?

reply
Vieuphoria 2012/08/04 08:18:35

No

+1
If Bush wasn't impeached, then Obama shouldn't be

reply
Drummerboy to Vieuphoria 2012/08/04 18:11:43
Vieuphoria to Drummerboy 2012/08/04 18:21:06

classy :)

reply
Drummerboy to Vieuphoria 2012/08/04 18:30:46
Vieuphoria to Drummerboy 2012/08/04 19:03:22

Not really.

There are presidents who have done far worse who haven't been impeached, why should we be impeaching Obama?

Truman for Hiroshima
Any president involved with Vietnam
Bush
etc etc

Why have we not impreached those? Why are they not in jail?

.... Double standards.

reply
Drummerboy to Vieuphoria 2012/08/04 19:35:24
Vieuphoria to Drummerboy 2012/08/04 19:50:34

Well I wasn't saying he shouldn't. I was saying they either all should, or none should. It'd be double standards to cherry pick.

reply
TuringsChild 2012/08/04 08:17:18

No

+1
There's GOT to be a better reason than THAT.
Remember Kennedy? Reagan?

reply
CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2012/08/04 06:19:56

Yes

+1
Obama and his followers will only get much more schizoid as the election nears.

reply
TheTruth1313 2012/08/04 06:08:35

Yes

+2
One of the many things the lying socialist traitor Obama should be impeached for.

reply
Mary 2012/08/04 05:23:03

Yes

+1
This is just ONE of at least 50 crimes he should be impeached for..or better yet tried for TREASON...then punished to the fullest extent of the law!!

The number at press time ..Tuesday August 17, 2010...came to 50 impeachable crimes!

http://www.canadafreepress.co...

reply
Don Leuty 2012/08/04 05:08:53

Yes

+1
But it won't happen this year. Get the election tucked away, the rest will take care of itself. Priority 1: No 0nama 2.0.

reply
DoxieDad 2012/08/04 04:52:30

No

If he is would somebody please tell the Syrian rebels. They are getting pissed at the world for not helping.

reply
Red_Horse 2012/08/04 04:48:19
Tee Quake 2012/08/04 04:41:54

Yes

+2
Absolutely. I was afraid he'd do this. The man is a menace and only becomes more dangerous as his actions become more skewed toward his own reelection. And make no mistake, the Republicans in Congress could stand up to Obama anytime, but have made the choice to leave him alone. We are in real trouble here.

reply
ParkMan 2012/08/04 04:07:16

No

He can commit troops where ever he wants.

reply
gingin6 2012/08/04 03:16:33

Yes

+2
He should of been impeached for the birth certificate rave and other crap we heard about

reply
wildcat 2012/08/04 00:22:24

No

Get this impeach idea out of your head, you will never get 67 Senators to convict.

reply
Red_Horse to wildcat 2012/08/04 04:49:00
Turings... to Red_Horse 2012/08/04 08:23:09

+2
So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause. -- Padmé Amidala (Star Wars III)

reply
wildcat to Red_Horse 2012/08/04 11:33:34

+1
You can impeach all you want, but without a conviction the process is an exercise in futility.

reply
Red_Horse to wildcat 2012/08/04 15:29:58
wildcat to Red_Horse 2012/08/04 21:14:34

reply
Red_Horse to wildcat 2012/08/04 21:44:53
Redneck Gal 2012/08/03 21:21:21

No

He's following a policy put forth by Bush/Cheney. They made this legal for a President to do. Policy is established, he cannot be impeached for it.

reply