Should Newsweek bow to liberals calls for censorship and retract it's cover telling Barack to hit the road?

by Blackjack Posted 2012/08/20 22:41:38

Related Topics: Liberals, Newsweek, Censorship, Cover, Liberal

Read More

125 votes
Read all 133 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	yes, explain	7 votes	6%
	no, explain	103 votes	82%
	other, I think this	15 votes	12%

+26

Add a comment above

Gracie - Proud Conservative 2012/08/20 22:53:25

no, explain

+13
They're getting a taste of their own liberal intolerance for opposing opinion. I bet they sell more magazines this week than they have in 10 years!
>> See Replies

More polls by Blackjack

BonnieDeutsch 2012/08/21 12:57:57

no, explain

+3
For once, a magazine has broken the media bias towards Obama and printed what America wants to read. And also wrote facts not spin. Bravo !

reply
Tastentier 2012/08/21 12:44:20

no, explain

+5
Freedom of the press. The press is already way too shackled by political "correctness" nowadays.

reply
mark 1 2012/08/21 12:30:09

no, explain

+4
They call it as they see it. Good for them!

reply
paul 2012/08/21 11:59:11

no, explain

+2
This is what happened when the media is bios. It happened with Clinton and the Lowinski matter. It gets to a point where they have to do there job or go belly up. There is stench around Barack Obama and the media can't deny it.

reply
Mark P. 2012/08/21 11:54:12

no, explain

+3
More like bend over to liberals. Its called freedom of the press and free speech. If liberals don't like it, tough.

reply
Mikey 2012/08/21 11:02:31

other, I think this

+2
I noticed there's no supporting article asserting that liberals are calling for a retraction. This is what is known as a "straw man"

reply
Maynard to Mikey 2012/08/21 11:49:47

+1
REALLY?

Great point.

Next time the LAMESTREAM MEDIA makes pathetic claims about Conservatives, all we have to do is say NO PROOF? Straw Man.

GUESS WHAT?

All the libs have is STRAW MAN THIS AND STRAW MAN THAT.

Would YOU like some DIRTY WATER and some DIRTY AIR while we throw Grandma off the cliff so we can get a TAX BREAK for the top 1/10 of 1%?

COME AND HATE WITH US.

Oh the fun we have with the libs, BWAA HAA HAA.

reply
WankerBait to Maynard 2012/08/21 18:45:43

reply
Lady Whitewolf 2012/08/21 09:47:30

yes, explain

Something like that is not necessary.

reply
HOMBRE to Lady Wh... 2012/08/21 16:37:28

+1
Heaven forbid truth in the news.(shame on them)

reply
ed 2012/08/21 08:50:19

no, explain

+4
Newsweek's next edition reads LIBERALS HIT THE ROAD WITH OBAMA .

reply
mrdog 2012/08/21 07:45:00

no, explain

+4
Free press ...right? bark

reply
Don Leuty 2012/08/21 07:25:54

no, explain

+4
Another example of the "Fairness Doctrine" in action.

reply
JingerJewels 2012/08/21 06:52:48

no, explain

+3
The truth is a jagged pill to swallow for liberal wing nuts

reply
Wulfdane 2012/08/21 06:52:19 (edited)

no, explain

+1
Whenever any group asks you to censor something, it is all the more reason not to.

reply
redhorse29 2012/08/21 06:45:50

no, explain

+1
No but I really do not trust Newsweek any more than any other liberal progressive elitist media publication. Newsweek has a long history supporting quasi-socialist governments.

reply
BritPunk 2012/08/21 06:37:53

other, I think this

+2
Where are the "liberal calls for censorship" of Newsweek? Who are they coming from?

reply
konalimu to BritPunk 2012/08/21 15:20:53

May want to check out Paul Krugman of NYT:)

reply
BritPunk to konalimu 2012/08/21 16:02:44

Yep, they're never been the best of mates, but how is it "liberal calls for censorship"?

reply
Omni 2012/08/21 06:34:56 (edited)

other, I think this

+1
They should act appropriate and exemplify political indifference. They're here to report the news, not suck a specific political party's cock.

reply
CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2012/08/21 06:30:37

other, I think this

+2
Newsweek lost me as a subscriber long about 2007 when they fell in love with Obama and MoMo. Every other cover was the new Camelot couple who have proven themselves to be nothing more than grifters.

No wonder the owners sold Newsweek for $1.

I am SURPRISED that Newsweek and the entities that own it now apparently have turned against Saint Savior and his missus MoMo by running a cover like that, plus the story.

I love to see progressives twisting in the wind as Obama is ensuring that Democrats remain out of power on the national level for at least a couple of generations.

reply
shadow76 2012/08/21 06:06:46

no, explain

+1
Never back down when you make a stand.

reply
Janet C K 2012/08/21 05:32:39

no, explain

Why should they?

reply
goatman112003 2012/08/21 05:25:36

no, explain

+2
The writer even though left leaning explained as a leader Obama is useless. We all knew that.

reply
mwg0735 2012/08/21 05:23:20
ParkMan 2012/08/21 04:44:54

no, explain

+1
They took a position and made the argument. Good for them!

reply
bbwolf35 2012/08/21 04:42:37

no, explain

The leader in liberal biased news reporting has to make apologies to the liberals for hurting some liberals feelings? Rich!

reply
gregaj7 2012/08/21 03:30:36

other, I think this

Keep in mind that Niall Ferguson is a Rothschild apologist:

reply
Red to gregaj7 2012/08/21 05:48:20
gregaj7 to Red 2012/08/21 06:17:09

I had an email exchange with him last year, and it didn't go well as we are on opposite views of the the Rothschilds and the Illuminati.

reply
fish 2012/08/21 03:28:49

no, explain

+1
Newsweek, just did an issue a few weeks ago with Romney on the cover asking if he is a wimp. This is fair coverage.

reply
angelbaby 2012/08/21 03:20:03

no, explain

+2
Free Press!!

reply
Christine/Rest in peace Pet... 2012/08/21 02:59:24 (edited)

other, I think this

+1
I wish Obama would hit the road, and I also wish Newsweek would stop sending me thier magazine that I never ordered. I can not get passed the articles headings on the cover, let alone stomach trying to read the dag gone thing.

reply
zapped 2012/08/21 02:55:30

no, explain

+3
then contraversary sell magazines ..

there correct on all aspects of story ..

but the truth hurts !

reply
heatha.bowen.7 2012/08/21 02:42:46

no, explain

+3
Liberals can not handle the truth and it is destroying this country.
I asked a question and got a leftist ideologue who decided he did not want me to speak the truth and reported me for a fake profile or something.
This is getting absurd

reply
zapped to heatha.... 2012/08/21 02:57:28

yeah me too .. I had many comments sensored & edited by the moderators " cause of complaints from the lefties "

reply
Ozzyboy 2012/08/21 02:30:04

other, I think this

+2
Need to know where this came from first. But, I think they will sell more magazines this week than they have in years.

reply
zapped to Ozzyboy 2012/08/21 03:02:01

+2
well who ever NAILL FERGUSSION IS ..the writter for the article .. I haven't researched him yet ,,,but a poision dart is likely looking for him !

likewhat happened to andrew breibarts

reply
Tennyson James 2012/08/21 02:22:39

other, I think this

+3
Who has asked Newsweek to retract their cover story? I haven't heard anything about this. Do you have a link to a credible source, or is this just more divisive propaganda?

reply
MsTlynne 2012/08/21 02:01:42

other, I think this

+4
Where's you link to a creditable source? I couldn't even find ONE.

reply