Should Newsweek bow to liberals calls for censorship and retract it's cover telling Barack to hit the road?

Absolutely not. It's probably closer to being the truth than a lot of the other news articles that other publications print. Please hold off on the censorship. I've got to get a copy tomorrow and judge for myself.

If they don't stand up to the political powers that be, they will be down the road..

Because if it bows to the LWNJs over this article, it'll have to bow to the RWNJs any time it calls Romney a "wimp."

When the article doesn't use facts, there's a problem. I'd have no problem with the article if it was fact checked first.

http://www.theatlantic.com/bu...

Last I checked, freedom of the press was still alive and well. Unless BO quietly did away with that through executive orders.

Freedom of speech is a Constitutional right and needs to be protected. Especially political speech.

IT IS THE TRUTH, GET OUT BO YOU STINK!

Nope; all news is biased...

They should stick to their truth, and demand other alleged journalists and papers and magazines do the same.

How about we allow the free press to be a free press.

To start with I have found no evidence to support this claim of anyone asking for a retraction of the article. So it seems to be another bogus post set up to bash the other side. Why am I not surprised.
That being said if it did/does happen to be true there is this thing called "freedom of the press."

No reason to retract the truth. We all know facts and the truth are two things liberals hate.

Who says rats can't swim?

Freedom of the press.

NOT ONLY NO, BUT HELL NO!!!!!!!!

The First Amendment exists for a reason.

Not in obama/soros land.

obama/soros

It would be fun to watch Newsweek blow like a flag in the wind!

Newsweek did this because Obama isnt radical enough for them.

No one should ever relinquish their First Amendment right.

And certainly not at the hand of a liberal.

I agree with your first statement but would like clarification about the second. It makes it sound like it would be more exceptable at the hands of anyone but a liberal. Why should that make a difference?

No. you are correct. It doesn’t make a difference.
It was more sarcasm than anything.

We had to endure the cover with a halo over OBummer's head,didn't we?

freedom of the press, Nobama.

Why ? They can print what they want and if someone doesn`t like it, they can write a complaint to the magazine. Or, start their own magazine and print what they want too.

This is just the admission by the liberal press that liberalism doesn't sell.
Go ask Air America.
They're still liberal at heart.

Why should they retract anything? Obama's had over 3 1/2 years and unemployment is still higher than when he took office, gas is over twice as high, we've lost more than twice as many of our military in Afghanistan under 3 1/2 years of Obama than 8 years of Bush and those are just a few of the reasons he needs to go.

Why should we believe Newsweek?

No need to take Newsweek's word, its plain as day to see, Obama sucks!

That's your opinion; not fact.

Absolutely, there is no right or wrong anything goes. As long as it goes your way. Truth is liquid. Right? Pardon me, Obama has surrounded himself with known Communist`s and even has known Muslim Brotherhood people in our Whitehouse. It concerns me as I have a grandson who has considered entering the military. I`m a veteran, but I hope I have talked him out of joining.

Like me, you have a right to your opinion.

That wasn`t my opinion. My opinions, I try not to share here. I suppose when Good Morning Amerika has it on their morning entertainment program, then it will be true. Now, that is my opinion. You see, it`s better I don`t give it. To procede; Lets take a peek at Mr. Obama`s senior advisor, Mr. Axelrod.Born 1955,mother wrote for a leftist magazine,PM.Many Marxist & Communist Party members worked there too.Axelrods mentor, Donald C. Rose, belonged to Communist party front org. 'The Alliance to End Repression'. Not my opinion. We can go on if you wish, I`m ok with it. We will be at it for a while. The depth of info and accuracy is well researched.OK to continue ?

NO< NO < NO, The Media should do more of telling the truth >>If the truth hurts ,change it in November >>> Has not kept one promise and most everything is someone elses fault >> I look at all he could have done for his race and all the people by listening to what the people of this country wanted >> He blew it ,BIG TIME .with his BULLSH-- ,lies and vacations,stimlus,supporting companies outside this country and ,bailing out the car companies who are now going bankrupt again,obamacare that is a job killer and not wanted by most of the people, Baling out freddie and fannie mae but letting the ceo's take millions in bonus for mismanagement with OUR TAX DOLLARS and they are still there mismanageing the companies < not allowing us to drill for oil , Promising russia he could do more for them when re elected > The list is endless >>>>> Isn't nice to read the truth and not spin for a change ??? To bad our media and free press does not learn from what it sees all around them >> Keep up the bias and he WILL HAVE 4 more years to finish destorying our country >>> Vote wiser in 2012

Do people still read magazines ? lol

Normally I compliment people`s avatars. Having a bloody dead Communist for one is confusing to me. Are you memorializing him? Or are you celebrating he`s dead? He, like Communism, is dead.

Communism Dead ? Did anyone tell China ? lol

Isn't Communist China the largest debt holder of the United States ? lol

Of course not, they haven't succumbed to pressure from anyone else, why should pressure from liberals be any different? -- Oh, wait, they ARE liberals. Well, maybe, if they still want to be liberals and get the inside scoop from the WH and the Obama campaign (not just the magazine, but the rest of their far-flung news organization).