Quantcast

Should N-Word Be Removed From 'Huck Finn'?

SodaHead News 2011/01/05 20:00:00
Related Topics: Literature, New Edition
You!
Add Photos & Videos
It’s one of the great childhood rites of passage, like learning to ride a bike or finding out that your dad doesn’t actually know everything. But should one of the indelible American literary classics really be overhauled to match our more politically correct times?

If you’ve held off on reading Mark Twain’s iconic “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” with your young son or daughter out of squeamishness over its liberal, era-appropriate use of the N-word, you might be in luck. According to Publisher’s Weekly, the book that Ernest Hemingway called a masterpiece that is the source of “all modern American literature” is about to be re-released with the offensive racial term replaced by “slave.”

After decades of the book disappearing from grade school shelves and curricula thanks to its repeated use of the N-word (appearing 219 times in “Finn”),Twain scholar Alan Gribben and NewSouth Books have compiled a new version that will be packaged with a similarly scrubbed edition of “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" in which the racial term, as well as references to “Injun” have been removed.

"This is not an effort to render ‘Tom Sawyer’ and ‘Huckleberry Finn’ colorblind," said Gribben, who has headed the English department at Auburn University at Montgomery for 20 years. "Race matters in these books. It's a matter of how you express that in the 21st century."

Gribben, who grew up never hearing the N-word, said the idea for the makeover came after years of teaching the book in which he would use the word “slave” when reading from it aloud.

He was also influenced by a move to the south and by his daughter’s hatred of the book after she became best friends with an African-American student at her magnet school.

Despite the tradition of considering the author’s intent to be sacrosanct in literature, Gribben said he was moved to update the novel after “Sawyer” was chosen for 2009’s Big Read Alabama as part of a program run by the National Endowment for the Arts. He was tapped to write an introduction to an edition of “Finn,” but after dozens of speaking engagements across the state he realized that teachers were avoiding the book because its language was not considered appropriate.

Critics have blasted Gribben for what they say is his attempt to “white-wash” history by ignoring the difficult parts and undercutting Twain’s attempts to expose the hypocrisy of the times.

Do you think the new edition of “Huck Finn” is a good idea?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • JOMO 2011/01/06 19:09:28
    No
    JOMO
    +34
    N****r, N****R, N****r.... Now that I have said the "N" WORD, let me share my opinion about the STUPIDITY where this word is concern. "IT IS JUST ANOTHER WORD", and this word is used in the black community in greeting and good byes at least a million times a day across America. It is a word that blacks have chose to pick the times when it is offensive and when it is not. There are several reasons I find a problem with that, first we blacks do not own the word N****R. Second we blacks do not live in this world alone and as a result other people have the right to freedom of speech just as we blacks do. Third it is my opinion as a black man that when it comes to racism, we blacks are the most racist people in America. Now I am sure that I will get tons of negative response to my opinion, none the less that dose not change the truth. Every time something happen to a black person in America that involves a white person the first thing to be said is the white person was prejudice, as though blacks are always right and didn't deserve what happened to them. My advice to those that have a problem with the word n****r, if the word dose not apply to you as a black person, then treat it the same way you would treat the word thief if it dose not apply to you or the word jerk if it dose not apply to you. BLACK PEOPLE get over it already, this is 2011!!!!!!!

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Clean Knickers 2011/01/06 06:07:19
    No
    Clean Knickers
    +1
    There's nothing wrong with the n word.
  • Dekker451 2011/01/06 06:00:39
    No
    Dekker451
    +2
    I wonder if anyone who voted Yes has ever actually read the book or any Mark Twain novel for that matter. He makes it quite clear that he was actually against slavery and racism, but hey, let's not let reality get in the way of a good opportunity for righteous indignation.
  • GinaMagini 2011/01/06 05:47:10 (edited)
    No
    GinaMagini
    +3
    Sanitizing the past will not change it. Lest we forget....books should not be censored. I am as opposed to racism as anyone, but history DID happen. What better way to point out the horrid wrongness of racism than to have accurate depictions of the way it used to be? I can't believe they want to censor books now. Will burning them be the next thing? And what about books that use derogatory terms for white people or people of other ethnicities? Is Alan Gribbon going to search them all out and edit them too?
  • Kiss the Taint 2011/01/06 05:45:18
    No
    Kiss the Taint
    +1
    How sad. Those people are so pathetic & spiteful to ruin a classic because of one little word.
  • Vaius 2011/01/06 05:22:40
    No
    Vaius
    +1
    Everything must go against political correctness. EVERYTHING!
  • Superpepsiman20 2011/01/06 05:21:03
    Yes
    Superpepsiman20
    If it gets the book back into schools I'm all for it. Changing one word in an entire novel won't make any diffrence.
  • Rusty S... Superpe... 2011/01/06 09:56:04
  • Superpe... Rusty S... 2011/01/07 00:45:59 (edited)
    Superpepsiman20
    But this is not a legal document...It's a novel written many years ago. Changing one word won't hurt anyone. Would you buy your children CD's with Vulgar & Lewd content?
  • Green Superpe... 2011/01/07 05:33:56
    Green
    I'll take my kids to an art museum where there are nude statues and paintings, but won't buy and leave playboys around the house. There's a difference.
  • Superpe... Green 2011/01/07 05:52:15
    Superpepsiman20
    so you are saying the N-word is an artistic expression?
  • Green Superpe... 2011/01/07 16:16:01
    Green
    I think there are two interpretations.

    One: Artistic expression. That is he was using the word to enhance his writing and the story he was telling. Changing the words changes his work. You may understand the story still, but you lose something. Compare it to the Bowdlerize version of Shakespeare.

    Two: When he used the word, it was just the word that people used in that day. That is, it was not an insult any more than Black or African American In that case we are trying to whitewash history so we feel more comfortable. We don't want things that make us feel, that we have to chew. Much easier to sip at a water-down version.

    Comfort rarely inspires people to change.
  • Superpe... Green 2011/01/08 00:40:56
    Superpepsiman20
    'Changing the words changes his work.'
    Twain didn't write about the "N-Word" so how can changing that one word to slave change his work? It's like cd's with bad language. there is an edited version and there is an unedited version. 'Huck Finn' shouldn't be any different. If it is gonna be in school i think it should be edited but if it we at a library or book store the unedited version would be fine.
  • Green Superpe... 2011/01/08 01:31:06
    Green
    You'd be surprised how much a word changes the feel, the tone, and the meaning of a work.

    A CD with bad language is not the same, you really need to understand that. You're comparing David with playboy again.

    And I will never support forcing substandard, whitewashed edited history on students. That is like calling Kristallnacht the breaking of a couple windows by vandals. Sure you may have the technical definition the same, but you loose the sheer scope of the horror of the night and ignore the context, a great disservice to the victims.
  • Superpe... Green 2011/01/09 03:54:47
    Superpepsiman20
    again this is and "Opinoinated" site. you are completly entitled to yours and I am to Mine.If you think it's "ok" to publish the N-word in 'Huck Finn' That's fine. but I feel different. In schools where children are involed...no. In a library or Book store where there are more mature adults involed yes. Nothing you say can or will change my opinion on this.
  • Green Superpe... 2011/01/09 17:00:28
    Green
    Where before did you call it an opinoinated site?

    I not only think it's okay but I'm offended that they do not. Huck Finn is a book slated for high school students. I think it is both an insult to them and disrespectful to the past. If I heard a teacher was replacing the book with this PC trash I would withdraw my student within the hour and arrange to have the class taken with a different teacher.
  • zcotty Superpe... 2011/01/06 15:31:53
    zcotty
    +1
    It's the principal of the matter.

    Well, that and brushing stuff under the carpet makes it hard to walk on...
  • MOMMA THOMAS 2011/01/06 05:19:30
    No
    MOMMA THOMAS
    +2
    NO, IT'S HISTORY HERE.....A PART OF CONTENT TO BE DISCUSSED.
  • Greetings Chap 2011/01/06 05:18:21
    No
    Greetings Chap
    +2
    no, it's free speech and when it was written it was a common word that meant no more disrespect than saying negro or black man. At least not when and where this book takes place.
  • wtw 2011/01/06 04:58:27
    No
    wtw
    +3
    The book should remain as written by the author. Either people understand the period and embrace that it was a period or ignore or white wash history(no pun inteneded).
  • magic_is_might BN-0 2011/01/06 04:58:03
    No
    magic_is_might BN-0
    +4
    At least the book was written for the times.

    Yet when it comes to modern rap music, no one is petitioning to remove the profanity and "n word" from it.
  • Lolaita 2011/01/06 04:56:53
    No
    Lolaita
    +3
    It's appropiate to the era. It represents that time, to call it something else is to misrepresent it!
  • Texas Johnny 2011/01/06 04:53:57
    No
    Texas Johnny
    +3
    That was a word used widely in those days and it is important to understanding the time in which it takes place. Don't like it? Too damn bad!
  • Flea 2011/01/06 04:47:49
    No
    Flea
    +1
    I was written at a time in history when unforyunately that word was used, and taking out the word would be the same as erasing that history.
    You may as well erase the word Nazi these days....
  • Bill 2011/01/06 04:45:31
  • bsb 2011/01/06 04:40:50
    No
    bsb
    I voted no,cause at that time period,that was the way it was.However,in todays time it changed because we learned that this word is hateful and demeaning.I say let the African-Americans have the vote on this one.
  • Bulanova (Team Hargitay) 2011/01/06 04:34:34
    No
    Bulanova (Team Hargitay)
    +1
    It is part of history, and the best way to forget history is to sweep what happened under the rug with watered-down words like this. If you forget what they went through, what they were called (although it was a harmless word at the time), you're trivializing what they endured. Besides, Mark Twain was one of the most pro-equality men of his days, holding a dim view of whites. Accept that the word had a different connotation at the time.
  • KR811 2011/01/06 04:33:22
    No
    KR811
    +2
    I'm black and I can care less.
  • PeterJohn 2011/01/06 04:28:47
    No
    PeterJohn
    the story is representive of the times. Shall we sanitize the rest of History to please the few cry babies? The ACLU must be behind this STUPID push to rewrite American Literature?
  • Jaigo 2011/01/06 04:25:20 (edited)
    No
    Jaigo
    I don't see what change is it going to do? I in no way like the word because the blood of my ancestors, so much blood was and is spilled in connect to that word but unless you pull the book what will changing a word do? Whites, Hispanics, Asians and all other cultures use that word anyway because they are dumb.They are too dumb to understand the legacy tied to the word, they just want to be black and hip. We who do know can't stand it. However it must be said that even if you remove it from the book their families will still teach them the word so what is the point? It doesn't erase the racism the majority have within toward Africans. Putting slave in it's place doesn't change the fact you are property and not a human. Something that could be tortured, mutilated, traded or erased without a second thought. We were not family like they try to portray in the movies.
  • MissJo 2011/01/06 04:23:49
    No
    MissJo
    +1
    1) I don't believe in censorship.
    2) It was set in an era where a lot of people used the n-word. Yes, it's an offensive term but people weren't exactly: LOLWE'REALLEQUALPEACELOVEANDH... back then, were they?
  • Anthony W. Leone 2011/01/06 04:12:07
    No
    Anthony W. Leone
    +2
    If it's so offensive, why don't they try removing the disgusting word from nearly every rap "song" then?
  • DiViews... Anthony... 2011/01/06 23:38:33
    DiViews2013
    You are more intelligent than this answer.
  • John Cox 2011/01/06 04:11:49
    No
    John Cox
    +1
    Ernest Hemingway and Mark Twain must be rolling over in their graves, or at least rolling their decomposed eyeballs.
  • safari 2011/01/06 04:09:55
    No
    safari
    +2
    As much as I despise the word and have never used it in my entire life unless I was quoting someone possibly - it is an account of the times as it is used in this classic tale. I know the libs like to rewrite history but please, leave Huck Finn alone.
  • politicaljunkie 2011/01/06 04:07:54
    No
    politicaljunkie
    +1
    These books are classic and teach us much about the times in which they were written. Ignoring the fact that this "N" word was commonly used during this time period is like pretending it was never said or used. Personally I feel the "N" word is one of the most disrespectful and offensive words in our vocabulary, but negating and deleting it from history and the classics doesn't teach the dispicable context of which it was derived.
  • Nisa PinkySwear(*~*) 2011/01/06 04:03:12 (edited)
    No
    Nisa PinkySwear(*~*)
    +4
    Even thought i hated the book and the word, No ...it just changes the entire book. Like someone said on another site....its like Re-writing Anne Franks Diary without the Holocaust.
  • ibow2no1 2011/01/06 04:03:02
    No
    ibow2no1
    +1
    Trying to rewrite history only makes people ignorant to the facts.
    If we forget the past we are doomed to repeat it.
    This book and many more should be left just as they are, offensive or not, it is never wise to diminish what the author was going for. It makes for a bad read.
  • Ambi ♥ 2011/01/06 04:01:01
    No
    Ambi ♥
    +1
    Oh come on, seriously? That was how people talked when it was written. It wasn't ment how it is today.

    I want to know what little kid can even comprehend that book though. We read it in high school, when we're teenagers. Not kids, when we won't know how that word would be bad to say today.

    Books shouldn't be changed just to be politically correct. There's no way you can please everyone, no matter what you do, so you might as well just keep it the same as it has been.
  • runningintriangles 2011/01/06 03:57:48 (edited)
    No
    runningintriangles
    +2
    The point of studying literature is to try and understand the point in time the piece was written in (or set in), not to water it down. Sure, sometimes it's offensive, but trying to hide the reality of that offensiveness is far worse than feeling mildly uncomfortable (or extremely uncomfortable) while reading it. We study literature to, oftentimes, understand history better, and editing out the unsavory parts of history does nothing to educate a person.

    This has nothing to do with "liberals," (I AM a "liberal," by the right-wing conservative definition, and I'm more against this than any of you "conservatives" can imagine), this has to do with idiots. This has to do with people who don't understand the value of reading literature as is, who don't understand learning from things rather than trying to hide the things we dislike.

    Sometimes things make us uncomfortable, it doesn't mean we ignore them and pretend they don't exist.
  • Raramonstah 2011/01/06 03:34:48
    No
    Raramonstah
    +2
    Because replacing it with slave is going to be so much nicer!

    No. You don't censor history.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/26 05:47:13

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals