Should N-Word Be Removed From 'Huck Finn'?
SodaHead News
2011/01/05 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
166 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
2,059 votes
|
|
93% | |||
It’s one of the great childhood rites of passage, like learning to ride a bike or finding out that your dad doesn’t actually know everything. But should one of the indelible American literary classics really be overhauled to match our more politically correct times?
If you’ve held off on reading Mark Twain’s iconic “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” with your young son or daughter out of squeamishness over its liberal, era-appropriate use of the N-word, you might be in luck. According to Publisher’s Weekly, the book that Ernest Hemingway called a masterpiece that is the source of “all modern American literature” is about to be re-released with the offensive racial term replaced by “slave.”
After decades of the book disappearing from grade school shelves and curricula thanks to its repeated use of the N-word (appearing 219 times in “Finn”),Twain scholar Alan Gribben and NewSouth Books have compiled a new version that will be packaged with a similarly scrubbed edition of “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" in which the racial term, as well as references to “Injun” have been removed.
"This is not an effort to render ‘Tom Sawyer’ and ‘Huckleberry Finn’ colorblind," said Gribben, who has headed the English department at Auburn University at Montgomery for 20 years. "Race matters in these books. It's a matter of how you express that in the 21st century."
Gribben, who grew up never hearing the N-word, said the idea for the makeover came after years of teaching the book in which he would use the word “slave” when reading from it aloud.
He was also influenced by a move to the south and by his daughter’s hatred of the book after she became best friends with an African-American student at her magnet school.
Despite the tradition of considering the author’s intent to be sacrosanct in literature, Gribben said he was moved to update the novel after “Sawyer” was chosen for 2009’s Big Read Alabama as part of a program run by the National Endowment for the Arts. He was tapped to write an introduction to an edition of “Finn,” but after dozens of speaking engagements across the state he realized that teachers were avoiding the book because its language was not considered appropriate.
Critics have blasted Gribben for what they say is his attempt to “white-wash” history by ignoring the difficult parts and undercutting Twain’s attempts to expose the hypocrisy of the times.
Do you think the new edition of “Huck Finn” is a good idea?
If you’ve held off on reading Mark Twain’s iconic “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” with your young son or daughter out of squeamishness over its liberal, era-appropriate use of the N-word, you might be in luck. According to Publisher’s Weekly, the book that Ernest Hemingway called a masterpiece that is the source of “all modern American literature” is about to be re-released with the offensive racial term replaced by “slave.”
After decades of the book disappearing from grade school shelves and curricula thanks to its repeated use of the N-word (appearing 219 times in “Finn”),Twain scholar Alan Gribben and NewSouth Books have compiled a new version that will be packaged with a similarly scrubbed edition of “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" in which the racial term, as well as references to “Injun” have been removed.
"This is not an effort to render ‘Tom Sawyer’ and ‘Huckleberry Finn’ colorblind," said Gribben, who has headed the English department at Auburn University at Montgomery for 20 years. "Race matters in these books. It's a matter of how you express that in the 21st century."
Gribben, who grew up never hearing the N-word, said the idea for the makeover came after years of teaching the book in which he would use the word “slave” when reading from it aloud.
He was also influenced by a move to the south and by his daughter’s hatred of the book after she became best friends with an African-American student at her magnet school.
Despite the tradition of considering the author’s intent to be sacrosanct in literature, Gribben said he was moved to update the novel after “Sawyer” was chosen for 2009’s Big Read Alabama as part of a program run by the National Endowment for the Arts. He was tapped to write an introduction to an edition of “Finn,” but after dozens of speaking engagements across the state he realized that teachers were avoiding the book because its language was not considered appropriate.
Critics have blasted Gribben for what they say is his attempt to “white-wash” history by ignoring the difficult parts and undercutting Twain’s attempts to expose the hypocrisy of the times.
Do you think the new edition of “Huck Finn” is a good idea?
Top Opinion
-
JOMO 2011/01/06 19:09:28No+34N****r, N****R, N****r.... Now that I have said the "N" WORD, let me share my opinion about the STUPIDITY where this word is concern. "IT IS JUST ANOTHER WORD", and this word is used in the black community in greeting and good byes at least a million times a day across America. It is a word that blacks have chose to pick the times when it is offensive and when it is not. There are several reasons I find a problem with that, first we blacks do not own the word N****R. Second we blacks do not live in this world alone and as a result other people have the right to freedom of speech just as we blacks do. Third it is my opinion as a black man that when it comes to racism, we blacks are the most racist people in America. Now I am sure that I will get tons of negative response to my opinion, none the less that dose not change the truth. Every time something happen to a black person in America that involves a white person the first thing to be said is the white person was prejudice, as though blacks are always right and didn't deserve what happened to them. My advice to those that have a problem with the word n****r, if the word dose not apply to you as a black person, then treat it the same way you would treat the word thief if it dose not apply to you or the word jerk if it dose not apply to you. BLACK PEOPLE get over it already, this is 2011!!!!!!!






















One: Artistic expression. That is he was using the word to enhance his writing and the story he was telling. Changing the words changes his work. You may understand the story still, but you lose something. Compare it to the Bowdlerize version of Shakespeare.
Two: When he used the word, it was just the word that people used in that day. That is, it was not an insult any more than Black or African American In that case we are trying to whitewash history so we feel more comfortable. We don't want things that make us feel, that we have to chew. Much easier to sip at a water-down version.
Comfort rarely inspires people to change.
Twain didn't write about the "N-Word" so how can changing that one word to slave change his work? It's like cd's with bad language. there is an edited version and there is an unedited version. 'Huck Finn' shouldn't be any different. If it is gonna be in school i think it should be edited but if it we at a library or book store the unedited version would be fine.
A CD with bad language is not the same, you really need to understand that. You're comparing David with playboy again.
And I will never support forcing substandard, whitewashed edited history on students. That is like calling Kristallnacht the breaking of a couple windows by vandals. Sure you may have the technical definition the same, but you loose the sheer scope of the horror of the night and ignore the context, a great disservice to the victims.
I not only think it's okay but I'm offended that they do not. Huck Finn is a book slated for high school students. I think it is both an insult to them and disrespectful to the past. If I heard a teacher was replacing the book with this PC trash I would withdraw my student within the hour and arrange to have the class taken with a different teacher.
Well, that and brushing stuff under the carpet makes it hard to walk on...
Yet when it comes to modern rap music, no one is petitioning to remove the profanity and "n word" from it.
You may as well erase the word Nazi these days....
2) It was set in an era where a lot of people used the n-word. Yes, it's an offensive term but people weren't exactly: LOLWE'REALLEQUALPEACELOVEANDH... back then, were they?
If we forget the past we are doomed to repeat it.
This book and many more should be left just as they are, offensive or not, it is never wise to diminish what the author was going for. It makes for a bad read.
I want to know what little kid can even comprehend that book though. We read it in high school, when we're teenagers. Not kids, when we won't know how that word would be bad to say today.
Books shouldn't be changed just to be politically correct. There's no way you can please everyone, no matter what you do, so you might as well just keep it the same as it has been.
This has nothing to do with "liberals," (I AM a "liberal," by the right-wing conservative definition, and I'm more against this than any of you "conservatives" can imagine), this has to do with idiots. This has to do with people who don't understand the value of reading literature as is, who don't understand learning from things rather than trying to hide the things we dislike.
Sometimes things make us uncomfortable, it doesn't mean we ignore them and pretend they don't exist.
No. You don't censor history.