...I would love to see him sit next to some ultra conservative religious person for hours and just watch their face...
but that is just me...
Should Man Have Been Allowed to Fly in Women's Underwear?
SodaHead News
2011/06/22 16:46:17
|
|
|||||
|
444 votes
|
|
31% | |||
|
854 votes
|
|
60% | |||
|
133 votes
|
|
9% | |||
US Airways just had to explain itself for pulling Deshon Marman from a flight and arresting him over baggy pants, but according to the San Francisco Gate, the same airline let this man on a flight without any hassle.
We can't help but wonder what Marman thinks about this.
"We don't have a dress code policy," [US Airways spokeswoman Valerie] Wunder said. "Obviously, if their private parts are exposed, that's not appropriate. ... So if they're not exposing their private parts, they're allowed to fly."
We can't help but wonder what Marman thinks about this.
Read More: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/crime/detail?e...
Top Opinion
-
Emanon 2011/06/22 18:52:47
More polls by SodaHead News
Sort By
- mutosheep 2011/06/27 23:47:15No
+1Indecent exposure is against the law. NOBODY should be allowed to fly in their underwear. Allowing sick, twisted perverts special privillages is wrong.reply - DancesW... mutosheep 2011/06/28 04:59:20+1You MUST call yourself a Christian too, right?reply
- MrSexyPants 2011/06/27 21:16:41Yeshey, if he wants to fly around in underwear, let him. I think we should all be free to express ourselves. Hey, if i could walk around in my underwear, I totally would! So I say let him rock his girly undies. Not that I myself wanna see him in it, but hey, do whatchu wanna do...reply
- Genise 2011/06/27 18:05:14NoHe looks stupid!reply
- dwight 2011/06/27 15:49:15Nothat is not suitable for any daily situations.reply
- harrypotterisawesome 2011/06/27 13:02:36No+1Ultra religious person, liberal, moderate...doesn't matter who you are, but what your value system entails--most Americans still hold fast to cultural mores and respect for others. This guy is wearing underwear as outerwear..I would not want to have to sit next to him in a tight airline seat! His undergarment fetish is better left a mystery!reply
- Detlev 2011/06/27 12:22:17YesSeat change yes - mulitple choice, please - the underwear by calivn klein. thats ok.reply
- Bettina 2011/06/27 04:59:57No+3what is wrong with people these days? No common sense at all, apparently. Next thing you know, this guy will be teaching kindergarten, wearing the same outfit and demanding his "rights". And there will be plenty of "politically correct" clowns to back him up.reply
- Don 2011/06/27 04:02:45YesIf the Goverment can go to extremes then so should Americans.reply
- Andrus, Pam 2011/06/26 22:55:30YesWho is to judge what under garments others wear? Not me.reply
- oneydjacks Andrus,... 2011/06/28 12:42:01That's the problem....They're not under anything!!!reply
- cassandra 2011/06/26 19:23:55Nothat look's sickreply
- Don cassandra 2011/06/27 04:03:51If you want to know what is sick then grooping Americans is not if you fell that way then you are sick.reply
- cassandra Don 2011/06/28 14:28:19you dissn' me boy:@ i thouth we can wright our OWN oppinions up here without someone attacking us up here:/reply
- Kenny Budd 2011/06/26 18:58:31No+2We have becoming the laughing stock of the world.reply
- Syl 2011/06/26 15:10:20NoIf he wants to wear a dress or even a mini skirt, fine. But not in his (or any) underwear. You don't need a policy to understand most people don't want to see this.reply
- Don Syl 2011/06/27 04:04:31most Americans do not want to be grooped.reply
- studiobrat BN-0 AFCL 2011/06/26 08:50:54No+3I think US Airways needs to change their so-called dress code! I hope the guy with the baggy pants who got booted out by this airline sees this picture and sues them!
reply - Man of god 2011/06/26 06:56:05Undecideddepends on what he wantsreply
- Guinness2050 2011/06/26 05:35:23Yesis one i can assume is not armed or dangerousreply
- Thor H. Asgardson 2011/06/26 04:32:20YesAs long as there is no bomb in the underwear; why not? Freak freely. The kiddies need a giggle, besides...reply
- FPSRules 2011/06/26 03:30:44UndecidedOnly if I can wear just a jock-strap and a hairnet.reply
- KatieErickson 2011/06/26 01:52:24Noewwww :P no so gey like to see a guy pull that stunt off HAHA!!!! Just wrongreply
- John Haverty 2011/06/26 00:09:44Yes+1This is a protest against the TSA , total sexual assault. These people with their unconstitutional UNWARRANTED searches, their pornographic scanners are all criminals and traitors and the TSA rats should be put into prison. These types of protests should increase. The TSA is disgusting and an enemy of truth, freedom, liberty, constitution and the USA.reply
- mutosheep John Ha... 2011/06/27 23:49:46+1This is not against the TSA. Anybody man willing to wear that at all obviously loves to be groped by strangers. Why did nobody knock this pervert out?reply
- Bill 2011/06/25 22:37:30No+2I would have kicked the freak out of the airport!!!!!!!reply
- Vilimaina 2011/06/25 22:19:11No+2he looks stupid.........and disguting......eeeeewwwwreply
- Ron 2011/06/25 20:21:17Undecided+5Maybe they should put him on a Delta Airline and send him to Saudia Arabia. They would take care of his cross dressing ass!reply
- tornado 2011/06/25 16:51:12Undecided+3That's a clever way to make sure he gets the window seat and nobody sits down next to him. The airline may have to provide a few more barf bags.reply
- Jackie 2011/06/25 16:31:17No+1Nt dressed like that! Neither should a woman!reply
- bub 2011/06/25 15:13:35Yeshe could have shown a little mercy and put a little skirt on! but it's not a against law to wear clothes of the opposit sex. women wear mens clothes all the time?reply
- tikiteek 2011/06/25 14:41:34YesWhat ever floats your boat!reply
- Dizzy 2011/06/25 13:52:50YesITS A FREE COUNTRYreply
- mutosheep Dizzy 2011/06/27 23:50:21+1You're not free to break the law dummyreply
- 4dc 2011/06/25 12:00:44No+3does no one see the irony here? A man was denied the right to board a flight because his droopy pants exposed his underwear...this thing is wearing nothing but underwear...women's underwear to boot...and if that nasty sack of junk in the front of his bikini isn't indecent then what is? would you want your child seated next to this freak?reply
- Lorene 4dc 2011/06/25 22:25:23+3I totally agree!!! Women have been booted off flights for showing too much cleavage or having a provocative outfit on... I recall of young woman not too long ago that was kicked off because her skirt was too short...so why is he allowed to fly in his (correction his female) underwear? To me that's a form of indecent exposure. AND if that was a woman trying to fly like that, you can bet she wouldn't be allowed on the plane!!reply
- clarewblue 2011/06/25 08:10:59No+2i think there is a code for airline but now they wil take anybody to make moneyreply
- Borat Obama 2011/06/25 07:07:29No+2US Airways has dress code policy. Then why did a man wearing pants lowered with his underwear exposed was not permitted to board the plane by US Air. Majority of passengers will not want to seat beside a man with just underwear on. Is this the dress code for US Air?reply
- N3o 2011/06/25 06:25:31Undecided... depends on how much beer drunk.reply
- Ron N3o 2011/06/25 20:25:06+1By whom? The other passengers or the crew? In this case it sounds like the crew!reply
«« First « Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
39
Next »
Last »
