Should Low-Income Families Receive Food Stamps for Their Pets?
ABC News U.S.
2013/02/26 10:59:07
- 13,657 votes
- Read all 9 opinions
- View Results and Demographics
|
|
|||||
|
2,491 votes
|
|
18% | |||
|
11,166 votes
|
|
82% | |||
Sort By
- JannaAnnSp 2013/03/02 19:26:06No
Noreply - Kerrie 2013/03/02 19:14:19NoNOOOOOO I meant no no no no noreply
- sky 2013/02/28 04:20:19No+1noreply
- Austin 2013/02/27 00:09:22No+1This question belongs in the "Fun & Humor" section.reply
- benjamin seiler 2013/02/26 19:29:05YesWhat this survey does not tell people before they vote is that this program is completely done through donations and is not dependant on the gov. or the tax payers.reply
- Christopher Bookkeeping 2013/02/26 17:09:07NoAlthough I do not believe that a civilized society should allow it's less fortunate to starve (even if they are the lazy less fortunate) I do not think that the tax paying fortunate should subsidize an added responsibility that those less fortunate CHOOSE to take on. If food rations could be given through donations I am all for that, the animals should not suffer as a result of their owners lack of foresight.reply
- Monty Christo... 2013/02/27 02:39:17hunger is motivationreply
- RichnBlessings 2013/02/26 16:20:30NoIf they can't afford to feed their pets, they should adopt them out. I don't want my tax dollars going to the "dogs", literally.reply
- Marshal Artz 2013/02/26 15:11:12YesPeople that need help in feeding there pets, should not have pets, but that is very hard to control. So food stamps to feed their pets is a good idea, but should be funded by donations and the Pet food manufactures. Purina makes a very good profit. In the long run what ever they would do would partially be passed on to the customer. These pets should not have to suffer from hunger.reply
