Quantcast

Should illegal immigrants be allowed to practice law in the USA?

Rusty Bubbles 2012/08/14 08:52:32
No, it would set a bad precedent
Sure, what could possibly go wrong?
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Justice Department opposes illegal immigrant's bid to practice law

Justice Department says federal law prohibits giving a public benefit, such as a bar license, to an 'unlawfully present alien' — in this case, Sergio C. Garcia of California.

An illegal Mexican immigrant who wants to be licensed to practice law in California has received support from the state's top law enforcement officer, the State Bar of California, civil rights groups, county bar associations and law professors — but not from the Obama administration.

In a brief to the California Supreme Court, theU.S. Department of Justicesaid federal law prohibits giving a public benefit, such as a bar license, to an "unlawfully present alien

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/12/local/la-me-immigrant...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Hey WTF 2012/08/17 18:28:04
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Hey WTF
    +1
    I almost wanted to say YES. Only because -then MAYBE they'll get it (OUR LAWS) RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

    But when you perform an illegal act regardless of nature - your whole personae and priorities have their own set of rules as self serving. It's not becoming of an American. Even though most are here just for self serving purposes and could careless about becoming an American. So NO is the answer I am giving.
    Either do it right or suffer the consequences of getting caught and posing for a picture with our great Sheriff Joe. Hope you like Tents and camping.
  • Schläue~© 2012/08/15 00:07:19
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Schläue~©
    +1
    Should a child molester be allowed to work at a day-care?

    Should a drug trafficker be allowed to work in a pharmacy?

    Should Barry Hussein Soetoro Davis be allowed to usurp our WH?
  • Vision of Verve 2012/08/15 00:00:55
  • T A 2012/08/14 21:12:12
    Sure, what could possibly go wrong?
    T A
    +1
    What a silly idea that that you need permission to represent someone at all. That decision should be the client's alone.
  • Theresa 2012/08/14 19:53:45
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Theresa
    +1
    LAWYERS are not American anyway they are part of the BAR which stands for the BRITISH ATTORNEY REGISTRY part of the British Gov't They are subjects under the Crown!
  • mustangluver 2012/08/14 17:09:36
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    mustangluver
    +1
    LOL It is illegal to get a law license without being a legal citizen.
  • none 2012/08/14 16:46:14
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    none
    +1
    What the hell is it about the word 'ILLEGAL' that people don't get?? Illegal aliens shouldn't even be in the country.
  • Boo 2012/08/14 16:45:22
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Boo
    +1
    Illegal immigrants should not be allowed to work here, go to school here, or receive social assistance here. They all should be arrested, detained, and deported.
  • Charles E 2012/08/14 16:31:54
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Charles E
    +2
    Law licenses are issued by the states, not the Federal Gov.
    But why is being a criminal not a basis for denying a law license in every state?
    Even Bill Clinton had his Law License suspended for criminal conduct.
  • Wyveryx 2012/08/14 15:29:06
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Wyveryx
    +4
    ROFL, let someone breaking the law practice law...Oh yeah that sounds like California.
  • Boo Wyveryx 2012/08/14 16:46:16
    Boo
    +2
    That sounds like lawyers!
  • Wyveryx Boo 2012/08/15 01:47:51
    Wyveryx
    +2
    Ok ,you got me on that one :)
  • Bronar 2012/08/14 15:13:25
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Bronar
    +2
    Once they are deported and come back in legally, sure!
  • Charles E Bronar 2012/08/14 18:22:17
    Charles E
    +2
    And pay for their travel out and repay all other benefits they received from citizens and legal resident taxpayers.
  • Bronar Charles E 2012/08/14 18:25:06
    Bronar
    +2
    Exactly.
  • JonDeniro 2012/08/14 15:12:35
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    JonDeniro
    +3
    Give a bar license to someone who openly defies our laws?
  • DizziNY 2012/08/14 15:06:00 (edited)
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    DizziNY
    +3
    Ok you want an illegal to practice LAW?? That makes no sense because they are breaking the law to begin with.

    deport illegals
  • MandaLynne 2012/08/14 15:03:18
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    MandaLynne
  • ManBearPig 2012/08/14 14:39:21
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    ManBearPig
    +3
    should i really have to explain this one?
  • Kigan 2012/08/14 14:09:44
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Kigan
    +3
    Should people with no respect for the country or it's laws be allowed to practice law?

    That question really answers itself. Kinda like having illegal immigrant Jessica Colotl working in an immigration department instead of deporting her.
  • Thomas 45 2012/08/14 14:05:35
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Thomas 45
    +2
    They must become US Citizens first!
  • ☆WillThompson☆ 2012/08/14 14:00:00
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    ☆WillThompson☆
  • kmay 2012/08/14 13:49:48 (edited)
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    kmay
  • Charles E kmay 2012/08/14 18:17:40
    Charles E
    +2
    Your sign says it all! Why should any rational person even consider giving a criminal a license to practice law?

    CA? Not that many rational people to oppose that idoicy.
  • wtw 2012/08/14 13:17:52
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    wtw
    +3
    That is insane of course not!
  • Kat 2012/08/14 13:17:31
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Kat
    +3
    How can an illegal practice law? That's sick, CA. nevermind.....
  • zbacku 2012/08/14 13:11:22
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    zbacku
    +4
    no
    Send him back to Mexico, I here there are plenty of drug dealers that are looking for a lawyer.
  • zbacku zbacku 2012/08/14 13:15:51
    zbacku
    +2
    'ILLEGAL'?????. Right off the bat, the problem lies with someone that is 'ILLEGAL' representing anyone in the 'LEGAL' system of the United States.
  • Jackie G - Poker Playing Pa... 2012/08/14 13:03:21
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot
    +4
    Hell no - they need to go to their own country and then practice law there.
  • santa6642 2012/08/14 13:02:13
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    santa6642
    +5
    send them back whining.
  • Wahvlvke 2012/08/14 13:01:40
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Wahvlvke
    +4
    Practice law? They should be thrown out of the USA.
  • Seonag 2012/08/14 12:59:32
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Seonag
    +5
    Absolutely not! Send him back to where he came from and let him practice law there!
  • rightside 2012/08/14 12:53:40
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    rightside
    +4
    Oh I wish bama would support this! It would just be another nail in his casket.
  • Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody 2012/08/14 12:52:48
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody
    +5
    Why do we even have to ask?
  • concerned dude 2012/08/14 12:48:41
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    concerned dude
    +6
    That's like having a criminal be a judge.
  • Charles E concern... 2012/08/14 16:45:27
    Charles E
    +1
    Exactly!!
  • Lady Whitewolf 2012/08/14 09:55:17
    No, it would set a bad precedent
    Lady Whitewolf
    +7
    They should be rounded up and SENT HOME.
  • The Bantam Seditioner 2012/08/14 09:30:00 (edited)
    Sure, what could possibly go wrong?
    The Bantam Seditioner
    +2
    Anybody should be allowed to practice law in the U.S., but whether or not clients will take a chance on foreign, underexperienced, or inept lawyers is another matter. Yet I do think the clients themselves should have that choice instead of a government agency like the ABA.

    Before the American Bar Association established a government monopoly over the certification of lawyers, lawyers would study as apprentices under their more experienced counterparts and have their mettle tested directly by their colleagues every day. And even though it seems that would be a recipe for chaos, some of the sharpest legal minds of our early history came out of that decentralized system.

    If there's any true threat to the American justice system, it is the double-edged travesty of lawyers who work for the state instead of their clients, combined with juries who are not informed of their rights to nullify Unconstitutional rulings.
  • RJ~PWCM... The Ban... 2012/08/14 10:05:30
    RJ~PWCM~JLA
    +5
    People here *illegally* should be allowed to practice *law*?

    And the inmates should run the asylum, right?
  • T A RJ~PWCM... 2012/08/15 01:03:28
    T A
    Anyone should be able to practice law since the client is the one who should have the ultimate say as to who represents him before the government, not the government.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/26 05:47:37

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals