SHOULD GRAPHIC ANTI-ABORTION POLITICAL ADS BE AIRED ON TELEVISION?
CINCINNATI -- A fellow Republican challenging House Speaker John Boehner has aired a campaign ad featuring graphic images of aborted fetuses and questioning Boehner's stance on abortion. David Lewis is challenging Boehner in the March 6th primary. His ad aired during Super Bowl pre-game coverage on WLWT, and other stations in Cincinnati and Dayton aired it Sunday. Lewis said in the ad that Boehner betrayed abortion opponents by failing to cut funding for Planned Parenthood. The ad claims Boehner "has blood on his hands." WLWT is not responsible for the graphic content of the ad, and the station is required to give federal candidates unrestricted access to airwaves leading up to the election. "One thing I can do as a federal candidate is show pictures of mangled bodies of babies murdered by abortion on stations with FCC licenses," Lewis said. He said political speech that might otherwise be deemed obscene may be limited to certain hours. "It may then have to be controlled by the special hours that have been set aside, if it's not appropriate for children, and should be played in the hours of 12 a.m. to 6 a.m.," Sirkin said. The FCC has determined that images of aborted fetuses are not indecent political speech. John Boehner's office said that the congressman's anti-abortion record is well known and cited his endorsement by Ohio Right-To-Life.
A well-known attorney on First Amendment issues said TV stations may not limit the political speech of legitimate candidates. "If it's offensive and it's a problem, the First Amendment is there to protect offensive speech, and if someone doesn't like it, that's not enough," said attorney Louis Sirkin, who has represented "Hustler" publisher Larry Flynt in free speech cases.
SHOULD GRAPHIC ANTI-ABORTION POLITICAL ADS BE AIRED ON TELEVISION?
Top Opinion
-
melly~thwarting Satan since... 2012/02/09 15:42:59Undecided+14I find it odd...I mean, children watch the Superbowl, and I'm sure they wouldn't know what to think after seeing that. But of course, those people aren't pro-life, they're pro forced birth. Out of the womb you're on your own, kid.
I find it appalling how much money, time, and energy we must spend defending something as basic as self-determination.






















THE BIBLE:
the bible supported abortion, that was done by a priest, in god's name, in his holly temple!
the 1984 NIV footnote of numbers 5:11-31 explained what "to thy thigh to rot, they belly to swell" meant: numbers 5:21 "or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness" to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.
'Ephraim, as I saw Tyre, is planted in a pleasant place; but Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer." Give them, O LORD -- what wilt Thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts...Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit; yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.'
HOSEA 9-16
the judeo-christian god is a myth and historical evidence proves it.
3.3.3 ATHEISM: A HISTORY OF GOD (Part 1) Evid3nc3
2nd Foundational Falsehood of Creationism-AronRa
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 36)- Thunderf00t
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 29)
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 28)
http://www.evilbible.com/god
http://skepticsannotatedbible...
THIS IS THE LAW:
ABORTION IS A CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGH...
THE BIBLE:
the bible supported abortion, that was done by a priest, in god's name, in his holly temple!
the 1984 NIV footnote of numbers 5:11-31 explained what "to thy thigh to rot, they belly to swell" meant: numbers 5:21 "or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness" to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.
'Ephraim, as I saw Tyre, is planted in a pleasant place; but Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer." Give them, O LORD -- what wilt Thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts...Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit; yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.'
HOSEA 9-16
the judeo-christian god is a myth and historical evidence proves it.
3.3.3 ATHEISM: A HISTORY OF GOD (Part 1) Evid3nc3
2nd Foundational Falsehood of Creationism-AronRa
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 36)- Thunderf00t
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 29)
Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 28)
http://www.evilbible.com/god
http://skepticsannotatedbible...
THIS IS THE LAW:
ABORTION IS A CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT SUPPORTED BY THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY, THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT, AND THE 13TH AMENDMENT.
NO HUMAN ( that means the FETUS, too) has a right to life or any due process rights by the 14th amendment to use another human's body or body parts AGAINST their will, civil and constitutional rights: that's why you are not forced to donate your kidney---the human fetus is no exception; this is supported by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment AND 13th amendment, which makes reproductive slavery unconstitutional.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
this makes viability unconstitutional because pregnancy is not a crime.
consensual sex=/= a legal, binding contract to an unwanted fetus to live; and abortion is not murder, the unlawful killing with intent.
THIS IS SCIENCE:
FETUS IS NOT A BABY (GOOGLE THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CHART), but a parasite because the classification of the biological relationship that is based on the behavior one organism (fetus) and how it relates to the woman's body:
as a zygote, it invaded the woman's uterus using its TROPHOBLAST cells, hijacked her immune system by using NEUROKININ B and HCG--- so her body doesn't kill it, steals her nutrients to survive, and causes her harm or potential death.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"The placenta functions as an immunological barrier between the mother and the fetus, creating an immunologically privileged site. For this purpose, it uses several mechanisms:
It secretes Neurokinin B containing phosphocholine molecules. This is the same mechanism used by parasitic nematodes to avoid detection by the immune system of their host.[2]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
" Due to its highly-negative charge, hCG may repel the immune cells of the mother, protecting the fetus during the first trimester. It has also been hypothesized that hCG may be a placental link for the development of local maternal immunotolerance."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"It is also possible for a symbiotic relationship to exist between two organisms of the same species."
http://www.answers.com/topic/... -- Gale's Science of Everyday Things.
just like a parasitic twin --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"an animal or plant that lives in or on another (the host) from which it obtains nourishment. The host does not benefit from the association and is often harmed by it"
http://www.thefreedictionary....
pregnancy CAUSES HARM: http://www.thelizlibrary.org/...
THE FETUS DOESN'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO FEEL PAIN --WHEN MOST ABORTIONS OCCUR.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/...
Well in truth most of them are turned on by the lesbians so they don't have to much problem with that, only wishing they could get in bed with them.
they never bothered me. Maybe you normal people should learn to accept the truth of abortion, i have and it hasn't altered my support.
Bottom line is I don't like graphic abortion ads. My peer group had a discussion about this at the Super Bowl actually. BUT I believe in the constitution and that people can speak their minds. Maybe with some limitations - later prime time depending on how graphic. But you'd white wash everything - likely not just because you don't like how graphic it is but also its political position. Hypocrite.
BTW - how far off are you from wanting to lynch people with different points of view? I doubt its too far from now.
Edit - Fannie is clearly not right. I've said nothing to make me a hypocrite. And I'm not part of a "tribe of men" trying to "bring back the guillotine" whatever that means.
I always think when someone blocks its an obvious sign of weakness. Clearly she is weak.
LOL!!