
Should Governments Have the Ability to Block Websites?
Christine Lusey
2011/06/23 11:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
28 votes
|
|
10% | |||
|
241 votes
|
|
85% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
6% | |||
It sounds crazy, doesn't it? Even as we watch countries like Syria or Iran or China block websites or curtail Internet access altogether, we can hardly imagine it happening here.
Well, that's probably what England thought, too. But according to Boing Boing, a group of lobbyists (representing copyright holders) met privately with U.K. government officials to discuss plans that would create a committee of industry experts in charge of determining which websites should be blocked to U.K. citizens, and a fast track system to obtain a judge's sign-off on sites streaming events live. This is all according to a leaked document that presumably the public was never meant to see.
Aside from the myriad of technological problems (if a website is streaming a television show live, how fast could a judge really respond to objections from the copyright holder and then order the ISP to shut it down?), it certainly opens the door to everyone's worst fears about the government stepping beyond the bounds of copyright infringement to just blocking whatever it deems objectionable.
Are copyright holders left with no other options to combat piracy? Or is this going too far?
Well, that's probably what England thought, too. But according to Boing Boing, a group of lobbyists (representing copyright holders) met privately with U.K. government officials to discuss plans that would create a committee of industry experts in charge of determining which websites should be blocked to U.K. citizens, and a fast track system to obtain a judge's sign-off on sites streaming events live. This is all according to a leaked document that presumably the public was never meant to see.
Aside from the myriad of technological problems (if a website is streaming a television show live, how fast could a judge really respond to objections from the copyright holder and then order the ISP to shut it down?), it certainly opens the door to everyone's worst fears about the government stepping beyond the bounds of copyright infringement to just blocking whatever it deems objectionable.
Are copyright holders left with no other options to combat piracy? Or is this going too far?
Read More: http://www.boingboing.net/2011/06/22/leaked-uk-cop...
Top Opinion
-
Liza Jane 2011/06/23 19:38:49No





















2. The UK is, yet again, showing the rest of the free world how to take another step away from freedom. All the Americans who want gun control laws and universal health care need to remember that we broke away from them so we could be a free country.
Sites with illegal content, terrorist sites, sites that tell you how to make home-made bombs to name a few that should be banned.
However watching the Government go after the internet for the sake of big pocketed companies is saddening.
England or the UK? Make up your mind...
What about child pornography websites? Should they be banned or not?
Websites that teach you how to amke home-made bombs?
Etc etc
http://www.unitedliberty.org/...
As for the terrorist sites...these days, every time the government wants to oppress someone, they label him a terrorist. Hack a website? Terrorist. Spill some inconvenient government secrets? Terrorist. Stockpile food? Terrorist.
http://www.networkworld.com/c...
This was sort of inevitable after we were stupid and cowardly enough to accept the Patriot Act.
Sites that tell how to make home-made bombs...really should be protected by both the 1st and 2nd Amendments. We are supposed to be better armed than the military, much less the police.
But that question here in America? Read the Constitution! (Its the doc limiting Goverment power)
Look closely at the freedom of the press part, then look at the freedom of speach part. Go down a bit and notice some verbiage regarding the "Freedom to assemble" part.
Notice that although the internet had not been invented yet, nobody worth 2 cents would argue that the internet is not the modern day press.
Notice that although internet websites are not physical places where people come and exchange ideas using their freedom of speach, websites are a place on the Web where people can exchage ideas.
Now call me a radical, but I fail to see how we can even ask this question in any seriousness?
The answer to this question is NO! HELL NO! NOT ON MY LIFE NO!
Just read the document and really pay attention to the words people, It is NOT THAT DIFFICULT!