Should Facebook Take Down Aurora Shooter's Fanpages?
SodaHead News
2012/07/28 20:30:27
|
|
|||||
|
674 votes
|
|
68% | |||
|
321 votes
|
|
32% | |||
The name James Holmes will forever live in infamy after the accused criminal murdered 12 people with gunfire and wounded many more during a midnight screening of "The Dark Night Rises" in a theater in Aurora, Colorado. Based on various reports following the shootings, it seems as though Holmes planned to become a real life comic book villain. As for other details, those are still scarce and getting inside a psychotic, cold-blooded man's head will be tough for prosecutors.
But getting rid of tasteless content in support of the Colorado shooter; that should be easy for Facebook, right? Not according to a report by CNN.com, which states that there are multiple fanpages for the killer, including one with more than 800 followers [or "likes"]. Facebook isn't like YouTube or message boards, where one can be anonymous. So unless they're using fake aliases and lack profile pictures, Holmes supporters are making themselves known publicly on the fanpage. Maybe they're Internet trolls. They could even be people with the same mental state as Holmes.
Regardless, Facebook won't remove the pages. Company spokesman Fred Wolens explained that the most popular Holmes fanpage "while incredibly distasteful, doesn't violate our terms." In order to be removed, it would have to post credible threats against specific people or intend to incite violence. We agree that free speech should be protected. But this lenient policy seems pretty inconsistent with the numerous stories we've heard over the years of everyday people having photos/content flagged and taken down, at times unfairly.
What do you think SodaHeads? Should Facebook remove the Colorado shooter's fanpages?


Read More: http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/25/tech/social-media/fa...
Top Opinion
-
thomas.fox.54 2012/07/28 21:24:17No+221st amendment. these people are sick, disgusting animals but they have the right to the 1st amendment. i hate censored websites anyway. people need to realize that they share a country with these people and they need to deal with it not pretend that these sick people dont exist





















They CAN take it down, of course. And I honestly won't mind if they do. But I think it would be a lot more effective if people joined the fanpage, and then started linking everyone there to viruses, flamed them, chewed them out, and made them absolutely ashamed of themselves. There's nothing worse than being chewed out on all sides by everyone, and realizing you have no legitimate defense.
Let the people speak for themselves, instead of having everything censured. I'm tired of censorship by the big guys. Let the people show the offenders the consequences of their actions in the same way the offenders did-- rip them a new one.
The people who joined this page are sick and disgusting, or perhaps just trolling, but taking the page down won't accomplish very much. They'll just put it up again, and again, or just be encouraged to make a new website shrine dedicated to Holmes.
sick minds are attracted to other sick minds...
we need better mental health care in America.
I don't think they should be forced to though.
But if Facebook starts taking down pages that is a slippery slope to censorship. The internet should be a place where the 1st amendment flourishes. I would put up with a bunch of Facebook trolls to preserve the first amendment on the internet.